 
|
Posted By Lewis Iwu,
06 September 2017
Updated: 08 April 2019
|
This month the Fair Education Alliance (FEA), a coalition of almost 90 organisations spanning business, education and the third sector, has published its third annual State of the Nation Report Card. In this blog post, FEA director Lewis Iwu outlines key priorities for UK government and schools, to ensure all young people are supported to fulfil their potential, regardless of their starting point in life.
Since the release of our last report card, the FEA has more than doubled in size, and we are proud to have welcomed organisations such as NACE that are doing great work to ensure that all children receive a world-class education.
As an alliance, we have set five ambitious Fair Education Impact Goals which, if achieved by 2022, would mean significant progress towards closing the gap between the most disadvantaged young people and their wealthier peers. These five goals are:
- Narrow the gap in literacy and numeracy at primary school;
- Narrow the gap in GCSE attainment at secondary school;
- Ensure young people develop key strengths, including character, wellbeing and mental health, to support high aspirations;
- Narrow the gap in the proportion of young people taking part in further education or employment-based training after finishing their GCSEs;
- Narrow the gap in university graduation, including from the 25% most selective universities.
Accelerated progress needed to close the gap
The year’s report finds that since last year there has been marginal progress made towards closing the gap between disadvantaged young people and their wealthier counterparts. For example, the gap in literacy and numeracy at primary level has narrowed from 8.4 months to 8.2 months, while the GCSE achievement gap has decreased from 13.1 months to 12.8 months.
However, the gap in permanent and fixed period exclusions remains stubbornly wide, and the gap in university entry has increased for the first time since 2010. On the current trajectory, we will not achieve the five Fair Education Impact Goals by 2022.
Inequality in education is still deeply entrenched in our country and our Report Card is a stark reminder of the scale of the challenge. As the UK seeks to reposition itself in the world, it becomes more crucial than ever that our young people are able to fulfil their potential irrespective of their parental background.
Five priorities for schools and government
We know that educational inequality is a complex issue to tackle – too complex for one institution or organisation to solve alone. But we believe that by combining the passion, talent and ideas of educationalists, charities and businesses, we can offer a strong collective voice that creates a lasting impact on young people’s lives.
In response to the findings, the members of the FEA have worked together to identify five key priorities:
- School funding: A commitment from the government that national spending should not decrease in real terms on a per pupil basis.
- Destinations and careers: Every primary and secondary school in England should have a designated and trained senior leader responsible for developing and delivering a whole-school approach to destinations.
- Avoiding an expansion in selective education: The government should continue to resist calls to expand selective education in the future.
- Measurement of social and emotional competencies: A framework of measures should be available to all schools in the UK to support their knowledge of the social and emotional competencies of their students.
- Early years: The government should commit to ensuring that every group setting serving the 30% most deprived areas in England is led by an early years teacher or equivalent by 2020.
We’re extremely proud that the Fair Education Alliance has provided the platform for such a diverse range of organisations to come together and collaborate on this joint report and the recommendations that stem from it. You can read the full report here.
Lewis Iwu is the director of the Fair Education Alliance, leading the coalition of 86 organisations. He was previously a campaigns adviser at corporate advisory firm Brunswick, where he specialised in education and social policy.
Tags:
access
campaigns
disadvantage
policy
research
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Tom Hague,
04 September 2017
Updated: 03 November 2020
|
At the 2017 Pupil Premium Awards, NACE member Fullhurst Community College was celebrated as a regional champion for its success in raising attainment for those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Deputy principal Tom Hague, who oversees the school’s pupil premium strategy, outlines the key factors behind this success.
While innovative, our approach to pupil premium is also simple, in that it’s grounded in good teaching and learning. We believe the most important factor is what goes on in the classroom, and this is backed up by research – but we also recognise the significance of other factors, such as attendance, behaviour and wellbeing. We take a “marginal gains” approach, trying to remove as many small barriers as we can for pupils, so they can do well academically.
Over half of our students qualify for pupil premium. As the majority, this group is always at the forefront of teachers’ minds, and the expectation of these pupils has to be high, because the school’s success is based on theirs. Though typically on entry our students start below the national average in terms of attainment, they still need to reach the highest levels to have the best prospects – and our disadvantaged more able learners perform above the national average for their group.
Combining external and in-school research
We use a simple software, MINTclass, to identify and track disadvantaged students. When underperformance is identified, we intervene rapidly, giving priority to these students in classroom interactions. We also ask teachers to mark these students’ work first, to ensure they receive timely feedback, and to keep them at the fore of teachers’ minds.
The data we track is not only shared with staff, but also with learners. Visual displays in each classroom show performance against targets, focusing on progress rather than attainment, with the aim of motivating students to keep improving.
Evidence from external sources is also used to inform our pupil premium strategy, including research published by organisations such as the Education Endowment Foundation, DfE white papers, and the work of previous Pupil Premium Award winners. Such research has led us to run CPD on effective feedback, re-evaluate our use of teaching assistants, and even make changes to the way we reward students. However, external evidence is always approached with caution; we are aware that any single intervention will not necessarily work in every context.
Within school, we encourage our staff to engage in research projects, with the intention of raising standards for our students. Recent examples include a project by our Embedding Literacy Leader, evaluating the effectiveness of different reading schemes and subsequent outcomes among students. Such research is showcased in our weekly teaching and learning staff briefing, disseminated by faculty leaders, and uploaded to our staff VLE, so it informs our teaching and learning strategy going forward.
In-school research by one of our Curriculum Leaders focused on effective teaching and learning strategies for more able disadvantaged students, and identified modelling as particularly effective for this group. For example, instead of just giving students a practice paper and then marking it, we break the paper down into chunks. Students are given time to work on a section, then the teacher models the process of answering each question – showing them how the answer is arrived at, how to set it out, and so on.
The modelling approach has worked well in maths, English and science, and we plan to spread it across the whole school – not just for revision and exam preparation, but more widely. This will be one of our main strategies for all students, with a particularly high impact expected for the more able disadvantaged.
Removing barriers to achievement
Being a member of NACE has complemented our intention to continue to drive standards up for more able learners, both in the classroom and from an enrichment perspective. One such benefit of our NACE membership has been CPD, which has helped our more able coordinator to inform the planning and delivery of our More Able Programme. The online resources provided by NACE have been used across faculties within the school, and the research featured on the website has aided our development of teaching and learning for more able learners.
Part of our pupil premium funding goes towards CPD. The funding also covers our More Able Coordinator role, which focuses on support for more able disadvantaged learners, building cultural capital as well as academics. This includes a series of Year 7 projects which students present to parents each half term, and a Year 9 project with The Brilliant Club.
Careers guidance is another major focus in our support for disadvantaged more able learners, with the aim of raising their aspirations. Our full-time lead on enterprise and employability works with all students, with priority given to the more able disadvantaged to ensure they receive bespoke advice.
Beyond this, we try to remove as many additional barriers as we can. In the past year we’ve worked with the Education Endowment Foundation on a research project they were evaluating, running a project to educate our students on good sleep patterns and the importance of sleep. Another example involved reaching out to Specsavers after realising many of our students were reporting difficulties seeing the board; this led to Specsavers developing a free eye-screening kit which is now used by schools across the country.
Our recent success at the Pupil Premium Awards is recognition for the work we’re doing at every level in the school, involving all members of staff. It’s proof that the available research and guidance are effective, and that those marginal gains really add up.
Tom Hague is a deputy principal at Fullhurst Community College in Leicester. Tom leads on outcomes and curriculum, including the use of the pupil premium. Tom joined Fullhurst through the Teach First programme, and recently also completed the Future Leaders programme with Ambition School Leadership.
Tags:
aspirations
CEIAG
CPD
disadvantage
feedback
research
underachievement
wellbeing
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Siân Farquharson,
21 July 2017
Updated: 08 April 2019
|
Siân Farquharson, post-16 challenge adviser and Seren programme coordinator at Education Achievement Service for South East Wales (EAS), explores ongoing reforms to education in Wales and new initiatives to improve provision for more able learners across Wales.
Education in Wales is being reformed. From curriculum to assessment and teacher training, regions and schools are at the heart of this “self-improving” transformation.
The report Qualified for Life sets out a clear vision of education for all learners in Wales. It focuses on the need for high standards and a pedagogy that inspires young people to succeed, and where potential is developed.
“Education changes lives, it provides opportunity, it enables individuals to shape their futures, it builds stronger, more tolerant and cohesive societies, it is the foundation of a strong economy. In short, education matters.”
– Qualified for Life: An education improvement plan for 3 to 19-year-olds in Wales
Alongside this, the independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales, Successful Futures, highlights the importance of education equipping learners for their future lives.
Provision for more able learners a national priority
Initial teacher education in Wales is also undergoing change. This year, a new set of professional standards will emerge. Responding to wider changes in education, teachers of tomorrow will be required to be expert in teaching learners to “learn how to learn”.
The Estyn annual report 15/16 highlights the performance of more able learners as an area of concern for Wales; in around a third of primaries, more able pupils do not make enough progress because the work they are set is insufficiently challenging. In secondaries, the proportion of learners achieving five A*-A GCSEs or equivalent declined for the second consecutive year in 2016.
Mechanisms for managing these changes have been established: Wales is divided into four consortia local authority regions (EAS, ERW, GwE and Central South Consortium Joint Education Service) which are focused on raising educational standards. Estyn highlights the need for these consortia to better analyse the progress of groups of pupils, including the more able.
Supporting schools to improve provision and outcomes
EAS has established a regional strategy to support schools to better support more able learners. Working in consultation with LA partners and schools, there is a clear structure of activities to be delivered by the Regional More Able Strategy Group, the cluster group forum and the Learning Network Schools delivering direct to all schools across the South East Wales region.
EAS is working in partnership with NACE and others to further develop this strategy. In line with the national agenda for the self-improving system, EAS will allocate resources directly into schools to enable them to work with NACE and each other to improve experiences and outcomes for more able learners. The principles of the Seren programme, which supports more able learners at KS5 to raise aspirations and increase Oxbridge and Sutton Trust 30 university applications, will also be shared across other phases and groups of learners.
Tags:
policy
Wales
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Colin Parker,
11 July 2017
Updated: 07 August 2019
|
Colin Parker, headteacher of King Edward VI Aston School, outlines the school’s inspiring approach to admitting and supporting more able learners from disadvantaged backgrounds.
At King Edward VI Aston School (Aston) we have one of the highest proportions of students coming from a disadvantaged background at any selective school in the country, with around 40% of Year 7 and 8 students receiving financial support.
This is partly because of location; the school is situated in one of the most economically deprived areas of Birmingham, in a region offering numerous selective schools for parents wary of sending their child to the inner city. But primarily it is because the school has given priority to admitting students from disadvantaged backgrounds. We are also fortunate in having a separate source of funding, to support students based on postcode rather than parental income.
Levelling the admission test playing field
A few years ago, the King Edward VI Foundation commissioned research indicating that social diversity was declining in its selective schools, and consequently put in place measures that would result in more students from disadvantaged backgrounds gaining places.
The first issue to consider was admission policy; from September 2015 Aston has given priority to admitting up to 25% of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. To make this a realistic proposition and go some way to levelling the admission test playing field, the school has set a qualifying score significantly lower than the score achieved in recent years by the last student to gain entry. Any student from a disadvantaged background achieving the qualifying score has a very good chance of securing a place.
Secondly, with the support of the Foundation, the school runs a familiarisation programme, working with primary schools who have a significant number of disadvantaged students. Parents and their sons are invited into the school, with the students undertaking work similar to that which they will encounter on the admissions test, including sitting a practice test paper.
Bridging economic, social and cultural gaps
So far, the increase in the number of students from a disadvantaged background has had no noticeable impact in academic terms. Evidence to date indicates that their academic progress is in line with, if not better than, non-disadvantaged students. We use most of our pupil premium funding to bridge the economic, social and cultural gaps, including a grant for participation in extracurricular activities.
It is also about expectations and language. At GCSE, we are talking about grades A*/A or above 7 and at A-level grades A*-B and then progressing to a high-tariff university. These expectations are relentlessly shared with the boys and their parents.
This is a whole-staff effort and a shared culture. At Aston, unlike many schools, we do not have a pupil premium champion; it is an expectation that this role will be played by all staff.
This all comes back to the reasons why we are in education. Our view is that the point of education is to transform lives, and that will happen when a student from a disadvantaged background gets into a high-tariff university and consequently on the path to securing professional employment. It will not only transform the life of the student, but also that of his family.
This blog post is based on an article first published in the summer 2017 edition of the NACE Insight newsletter, available for all NACE member schools. To view past editions of Insight, log in to the members’ area of the website.
Tags:
access
aspirations
CEIAG
collaboration
disadvantage
parents and carers
transition
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Nishkam School West London,
16 June 2017
Updated: 07 August 2019
|
Tom Cragg, vice principal and line manager of the more able coordinator at Chelsea Academy, describes the steps taken to maximise the feedback given by NACE following the Academy’s successful Challenge Award assessment day.
I am vice principal at Chelsea Academy, a Church of England Academy situated just off London’s famous King’s Road, with a vibrant and highly diverse student body of just over 1,000. A high percentage of our students are pupil premium, but they have great ambitions, which makes the Academy a fantastic place to work. We believe that we have given our more able students a great platform to go on and achieve success through bespoke curriculum pathways, targeted intervention and by exposing them to opportunities that have broadened their horizons.
After the initial euphoria of achieving the NACE Challenge Award, all of the relevant post-holders sat down together and read through the report, highlighting where development points related to their areas of responsibility, for example, higher-level questioning for the Lead Practitioner Team or embedding intervention strategies for the overall Raising Standards Leader. Two weeks later, we revisited the report in a leadership team meeting, and agreed where the most significant areas for development would fit into next year’s Academy development plan.
Sustaining the momentum
Naturally, a lot of hard work went into presenting the Academy in its best possible light on the assessment day, so it was important to celebrate all of the positive feedback we received, as well as highlighting the points for improvement. Rather than present this in one whole staff meeting slot, we thought it would have more impact using our weekly “sharing good practice” briefing slots over the course of one half-term. So for five weeks in a row, we shared one “www” (what went well) and one “ebi” (even better if) with the whole staff.
This information was also published on our learning cloud so that essentially, the more able agenda was “marketed” in as many places as possible and as often as possible to keep it fresh in people’s minds. In order to sustain this momentum, we will be co-planning our weekly CPD sessions for the next academic year with the Lead Practitioner Team, as well as recycling tips and examples of good practice relating to our feedback in our weekly staff bulletin.
Engaging parents in more able provision
The NACE audit was highly effective in bringing to light areas for improvement and as we compiled our evidence, we realised that it had been a while since we had undertaken a parental survey. So we asked for parents’ views on a range of more able-related questions. There was a clear pattern of overwhelmingly positive feedback from the upper years, but a less consistent level of positivity as we read through the survey results in the lower years. So it was clear that we needed to engage with the parents of our more able learners in Key Stage 3 in particular.
For this reason, we will be running a more able parents’ information evening in June for parents of students in Years 7-10. In my next blog post, I will share full details of the event, along with some reflections about how it went.
All of the above has helped not only to ensure that the momentum gained from achieving the Challenge Award is sustained, but also raise the profile of the more able agenda on our colleagues’ list of priorities.
Tags:
Challenge Award
Challenge Framework
parents and carers
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Paul Dick,
03 April 2017
Updated: 22 December 2020
|
Berkshire’s Kennet School recently attained its third accreditation under the NACE Challenge Award scheme, one of only a small number of schools to achieve this so far. Paul Dick, chief executive of the Kennet School Academies Trust, explains how the Award and underlying framework have helped the school raise standards for all students.
Kennet School is very proud of being only the 12th school in the country to achieve a third-time accreditation of the NACE Challenge Award.
The school is a large 11-18 academy, with 1,750 pupils on roll. It serves the “new” town of Thatcham and surrounding villages, and has almost doubled in size in the last 20 years, becoming the school of choice in a wide area. Kennet School has been rated outstanding by Ofsted from 2008-2014 and again from 2016. The intake is broadly average by most measures, and it enjoys both a Physically Disabled Resource and a Hearing Impaired Resource.
How has the Challenge Award made a difference?
We have found the Challenge Award hugely effective in raising our standards so that we gained an Ofsted outstanding rating, but also to maintain and improve further those same standards. The framework of the Award highlights the importance of a high-quality curriculum for more able children, but also one which benefits all children. Its strategic thinking and pedagogical structures are well-matched to one of our key mottos: “Better never stops”.
The Award helped us focus on ensuring that, both inside and outside the classroom, curricular and associated opportunities for all our children are second to none. Our Ofsted rating and exceptionally high scores in Progress 8 and in the Sixth Form underline the power of the NACE Challenge Award.
Planning and training key to success
I am proud of all we do, and our Challenge Award report reminds us that we have a “rich culture of celebration and achievement for all pupils, including the most able”. This is underpinned by our School Development Plan, and that is secured by the persistent and consistent commitment amongst our staff to improve their own skills and also those of our pupils.
Training for all in our academy has been key. Opportunities for high achievement within and outside the curriculum are planned for and therefore happen and are effective; such important issues are not left to chance.
Ongoing evaluation and improvement
A key strength of the Challenge Award is the fact that it identifies areas where the school can improve further, and we take these things seriously. We are considering further use of our virtual learning environment (VLE) to provide a forum for the most able, and we are considering how we can improve research techniques amongst our pupils. We also have issues to consider in the use of transactional language and mastery more generally.
As a head teacher, I commend the Challenge Award to every school. I have found it tremendously powerful at all stages of our development, in this school and in other schools where I have had management responsibilities. Whether the school needs to develop from a low Ofsted category and low achievement to a high-performing school, or go beyond the outstanding category, the framework provides the challenge, the direction and the energy for all.
Join the Challenge today!
Paul Dick is the chief executive of the Kennet School Academies Trust, and has been head of Kennet School since 1989. During this time he’s also led a number of other schools to strong positions, as well as serving on the board of the forerunner of QCA and contributing to a range of local and national developments. He won the Leadership Teaching Award for best leader in the South of England in 2000, and holds an OBE for services to education.
Find out more about the NACE Challenge Award.
Tags:
CPD
Ofsted
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|