Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Register
Leadership and governance
Blog Home All Blogs
Collection of blog posts for and by school leaders, to support the development and maintenance of a whole-school culture of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes examples of effective school improvement initiatives, guidance for those in a range of leadership roles, updates on the latest national policy and education research, and inspiring thought leadership pieces from across the NACE network.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: school improvement  leadership  policy  curriculum  aspirations  CPD  Wales  collaboration  disadvantage  research  assessment  CEIAG  lockdown  underachievement  access  resilience  wellbeing  Challenge Framework  Challenge Award  enrichment  parents and carers  myths and misconceptions  Ofsted  self-evaluation  student voice  transition  campaigns  character  Estyn  higher education 

NACE Quality of Education Curriculum Audit Tool: Q&A

Posted By NACE, 06 February 2020
Curriculum review and development is high on the agenda for all schools. The new Ofsted and ISI inspection frameworks and the new Curriculum for Wales emphasise the importance of an ambitious curriculum vision with sufficient breadth and depth to meet the needs of all learners at all phases, including the most able.
 
Against this backdrop, the NACE Quality of Education Curriculum Audit Tool© has been developed to support whole-school curriculum review with a focus on provision for more able learners.
 
Read on to learn more about how the tool could support your school.
 

What can the NACE Curriculum Audit Tool be used for?   

The NACE Curriculum Audit Tool can be used for a variety of purposes. Use of the tool gives a sharp focus on curriculum provision for more able learners in a school’s care. Importantly, it helps school leaders to reflect on the performance of the more able, gauge curriculum strengths and identify areas for development.
 

How can the tool help to improve more provision in my school?

The tool helps schools to methodically and systematically reflect on the performance of and provision for more able learners. It allows schools to gauge where strengths lie and to identify areas in need of further development for this specific group of learners.
 

How can the tool help schools focusing on curriculum development?

The Audit Tool will support schools in developing their vision and principles for curriculum design, providing useful prompters and criteria for schools exploring key questions such as “What should we teach and why?”
 

How can the tool help schools in Wales focusing on curriculum reform?

The Welsh version of the audit tool has been specifically designed and structured to evaluate present curriculum strategy and provision, with flexibility and adaptability for schools to use it to move in line with education innovation and reform.  
 

How will the tool complement other self-evaluation methods used by schools in Wales?

Self-evaluation is at the heart of the Welsh school improvement journey and effective schools systematically use robust self-evaluation to progress. In inspection reports, Estyn often cites weaknesses in the challenge that schools provide for more able learners.  
 
The Audit Tool provides schools with an objective starting point and structure through which to review, challenge, test and develop curriculum. In this way it involves all the school. It allows an in-depth examination of the component parts of a school which make up the whole.
 
It is specifically designed to sharply focus on the evaluation of curriculum provision in order to judge whether this meets the needs of more able learners and to signpost the way forward. It is not intended to replace other self-evaluation processes and procedures employed by the school, but to supplement and enhance them whilst at the same time avoiding unnecessary overlap.    
 

Who would use the Audit Tool to carry out self-evaluation?

Evaluations may be carried out by all school stakeholders. Leaders and middle managers would use the tool to make judgements on current provision and performance, overall or focusing on a particular subject/phase. Outcomes can be used strategically to identify school priorities in order to meet the needs of more able learners. Teachers and support staff can use the tool to help judge the effectiveness of curriculum provision and the parameter of learner capabilities. It will help to evaluate more able pupils’ learning to date, and to identify next steps of learning.
 

What benefits will teachers and support staff gain from using the Audit Tool?

Given the chance to evaluate the curriculum they provide for more able learners, teachers and support staff are more likely to self-reflect on their own performance and become more responsible and accountable for the teaching and learning experiences they provide. When staff can see that the outcomes of their self-evaluation are being taken seriously and acted on by senior leaders, it can prove to be a motivating experience which consolidates trust and confidence across the whole school community.   
 

Can learners participate in the curriculum audit process?

Self-evaluation is always at its most effective when all stakeholders are fully involved. Changing learners’ roles from passive observers to active participants and valued contributors has the greatest impact on engagement. In best practice, learners are routinely encouraged to self-evaluate.  
 
Effective self-evaluation offers opportunities for learners to look at themselves, reflect on how they best learn, acquaint themselves with the unknown, be guided on to new learning and to develop as ambitious, capable learners. Becoming part of the decision-making process makes it more likely for those involved to fully engage in the decisions that are made. Learner voice is a powerful force and often we can learn as much from children and young people as they learn from us.
 
To find out more and to access the NACE Quality of Education Curriculum Audit Tool, click here.
 

Tags:  curriculum  school improvement  self-evaluation  student voice 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Using historic outcomes to target improvement

Posted By Ann McCarthy, 04 December 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
How effective is your use of school data? Ahead of her upcoming workshop “Using data to inform learning and secure high achievement”, NACE associate Dr Ann McCarthy shares guidance on the use of historic outcomes to target improvement in outcomes for all learners, including the more able.

This area is led by headteachers and senior leadership teams who set strategy, policy, school improvement plans and quality assurance arrangements. Senior leaders also develop middle leaders so they too can contribute to school priorities, extending the vision and policy into their areas of responsibility.

Based on effective school review and self-evaluation, school leaders highlight areas for development and improvement. They set targets which include the quality and range of school provision, progress and achievement of more and exceptionally able learners. They introduce new initiatives and practices with measurable outcomes, and promote action research to enable them to explore and implement the most effective strategies and practice.

It is important to set quantitative targets so the impact of actions can be measured objectively. This information can then be supplemented by qualitative measures of performance. Learners’ attainment and achievement targets are used to ensure all, including the most able, make appropriate progress across year groups and over time.

Six steps to implement in your school

  1. Put in place an action plan in response to self-evaluation and research evidence, which includes performance measures.
  2. Set whole-school end of key stage targets, using national benchmarks, which can be measured.
  3. Use the same or higher targets for interim school years.
  4. Set quantitative performance data targets, with attention to closing gaps in achievement between different year groups and subjects.
  5. Include targets for defined groups of learners including: gender; ethnicity; EAL; SEND and disadvantage.
  6. Identify other schools where performance is better in target areas and seek to work in collaboration or acquire support, dependent on needs.
In general, leaders would expect to see a small variation in the performance profile between year groups. This allows leaders to target marginal improvement year on year using existing data. However, where there is a significant variation in the prior performance of any given year group, these targets should be adjusted to reflect the differences.

Reviewing outcomes for more able learners

The following questions, regarding more able learners, should be considered:
  • Are historic attainment outcomes in line with or better than average for similar schools or family of schools? 
  • What actions will lead to higher attainment and what quality assurance milestones can be put in place?
  • Do more able learners make the same or better progress than other learners, relative to their starting points, and is this true regardless of learner groups?
  • Have targets been put in place for all year groups and for all subjects?
  • Are there any subjects or year groups where progress and attainment measures lie below whole-school targets and what specific action is in place to monitor and measure improvement?
  • Have the targets been communicated effectively to middle leaders and have they acted to make changes which will lead to further improvements?
  • When reflecting on the school’s position in relation to more able learners, there is a balance between where the school has been historically and what might be achieved if all barriers were removed.
This article is an excerpt from the NACE Essentials guide "Using data to improve provision for more able learners". To access this guide and the full NACE Essentials range, log in as a member.

Tags:  leadership  policy  school improvement  self-evaluation 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

New NACE Challenge template to support curriculum review

Posted By Hilary Lowe, 30 November 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
NACE Education Adviser Hilary Lowe explains the thinking behind this new resource, and suggests a range of approaches for its implementation...

The NACE Challenge Framework is designed to help schools review and plan for improvements in challenge for more able and other learners across all areas of the curriculum and school experience. To facilitate this, the latest round of updates to the Framework and supporting resources includes a new departmental and curriculum review template – available via the Challenge Hub area of our website for all schools working with the NACE Challenge Development Programme.

This new resource should help those leading on a school’s use of the Challenge Framework to engage middle leaders in the review and planning cycle. It provides key aspects from the Challenge Framework self-evaluation template, with which to interrogate provision and practice for more able learners in specific curriculum areas and plan for further developments.

The curriculum review tool will also enable middle leaders, in collaboration the school’s NACE Challenge lead, to gather and synthesise evidence of high-quality provision on a very secure footing – building a strong portfolio for submission if/when the school chooses to apply for NACE Challenge Award accreditation.

The Challenge Framework is already accompanied by detailed guidance to support the coordination of the self-evaluation process. In addition, when making use of the new departmental review template, schools could consider the following approaches:
  • Choose a selection of departments/curriculum areas as “early adopters” of the review tool. These teams then present their findings to other departments, who go on to undertake their own reviews. Joint planning of next steps could take place at relevant meetings of department/curriculum leaders.
  • The Challenge Framework lead works with a few/all departments to support review and development.
  • A head of department/curriculum area asks a colleague to take responsibility for the review; the completed review is then used to inform planning, in the light of whole-school priorities.
  • Departments/curriculum areas undertake peer reviews or triad reviews of provision for more able learners.
  • All departments/areas focus on reviewing provision and practice in a specific strand of the Challenge Framework identified by senior leaders.
  • The Framework is integrated within existing school self-evaluation and development systems and cycles.
Whatever the processes used, the gathering of evidence for planning, evidence of impact and for Challenge Award accreditation should rely on information gathered from all areas of the school, for each of the six key categories (“elements”) of the framework.

Evidence from individual curriculum areas is crucial and the curriculum review template will become an invaluable tool for schools using the Challenge Framework and working towards the Challenge Award.


If your school is already working with the Challenge Framework, log in to access all current NACE Challenge resources.

Not yet working with the Challenge Framework? Find out how the NACE Challenge Development Programme could support your school.
 

Tags:  curriculum  leadership  school improvement  self-evaluation 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Using the NACE Challenge Framework: dos and don’ts

Posted By Christabel Shepherd, 03 September 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020

The NACE Challenge Framework offers an established tool for school self-review and improvement in more able provision, within the context of challenge for all. Supporting whole-school improvement and continuous development, the Framework can lead to formal accreditation through the NACE Challenge Award. 

In this blog post, Executive Headteacher Christabel Shepherd draws on her experience of using the NACE Challenge Framework and achieving the Challenge Award in two schools, sharing her top “dos” and “don’ts” for those starting out on the NACE Challenge journey…

Do…

Work collaboratively

The Challenge Framework is designed to be used by all staff in your school and is most effective when all staff are empowered to contribute. Identify key staff members to work with you – including senior leaders, department/subject leads and influential members of the teaching team – and encourage them to share the “challenge” message school-wide.

Communicate what, who and why

In some cases, you may be leading on challenge in a setting where some staff believe there are no “more able” learners. It is important to share clear definitions of what you mean by more able, as well as what you mean by “challenge”.

It is also important to consistently share the message that high-quality challenge is the responsibility of every stakeholder in the school and the right of every child. Back up your views with research and evidence, including case studies from schools holding the Challenge Award.

Be systematic

Use the Challenge Framework to identify priorities for your school. Produce clear action plans, supported by clear success criteria and identify key staff to lead on each. Follow up with regular monitoring and evaluation.

As well as the supporting guidance provided by NACE, you may find it useful to use the Education Endowment Foundation’s Putting Evidence to Work – A School’s Guide to Implementation.

Be prepared for the “implementation dip”

This is normal. Keep yourself and your colleagues motivated by staying focused on the “why”, celebrating good practice, and sharing relevant research and examples.

Be resilient

Especially when you first start working with the Challenge Framework, it’s likely that you’ll have some persuading to do. Not all staff members in your school or department will immediately be on board – as is the case with any new approach or tool. Be prepared for this and keep going even when things seem tough – it will be worth it!

Don’t…

Focus just on the award

Achieving the NACE Challenge Award is wonderful, but the real value of the Challenge Framework is in the journey. Consider how you can use it as a catalyst and tool for change, leading to improved outcomes for learners, and setting in place a lasting model to support continuing whole-school improvement.

Rush

The Framework cannot bring about real, substantive change if used as a superficial checklist. Maintain a steady, systematic thoroughness and remember the minutiae matter, especially in terms of classroom practice. Keep drilling down to ensure that there is real depth to change in the setting and that it is sustainable in the long term.

Forget about the learners

Keep returning to consider the impact of any actions taken on learners. Champion learner voice and make them part of the process. Celebrate and discuss changes with learners, so that the change and its effects are clear and tangible to them.

Stop

The Challenge Framework is an ongoing journey – one that doesn’t end with the Challenge Award. Ensure that plans are in place to build on successes year on year in terms of provision for more able learners and high-quality challenge for all.

Find out more about the NACE Challenge Development Programme. 

Tags:  collaboration  leadership  school improvement  self-evaluation 

PermalinkComments (0)