Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Register
Curriculum, teaching and support
Blog Home All Blogs
Guidance, ideas and examples to support schools in developing their curriculum, pedagogy, enrichment and support for more able learners, within a whole-school context of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes ideas to support curriculum development, and practical examples, resources and ideas to try in the classroom. Popular topics include: curriculum development, enrichment, independent learning, questioning, oracy, resilience, aspirations, assessment, feedback, metacognition, and critical thinking.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: pedagogy  questioning  enrichment  research  oracy  independent learning  curriculum  free resources  KS3  aspirations  cognitive challenge  KS4  assessment  language  literacy  feedback  metacognition  resilience  collaboration  critical thinking  maths  confidence  English  creativity  wellbeing  lockdown  vocabulary  access  mindset  problem-solving 

4 ways to avoid “But am I right Miss?”

Posted By Catherine Metcalf, 09 October 2019

Cathy Metcalf, Year 5 teacher and expressive arts lead at St Mary's RC Primary School, shares four approaches to help learners move beyond the search for a single right answer.

For many of our more able learners, much of their education is spent seeking (and usually finding) answers. Correct answers. They are the children in our class who ‘know’ they have the answer we are looking for, and frequently the learners who struggle when they get an answer wrong. But how do these learners cope when there is no ‘right’ answer? When everyone’s ideas and opinions are valued and acceptable, and right and wrong are no longer the outcomes or intentions of the lesson?

Element 3c of the NACE Challenge Framework reminds us of our responsibility to consider “social and emotional support” as well as academic provision for the more able. Similarly, the updated education inspection framework (EIF) calls for schools to develop “pupils’ character… so that they reflect wisely, learn eagerly, behave with integrity and cooperate consistently well” and “pupils’ confidence, resilience and knowledge so that they can keep themselves mentally healthy”. In Wales too, wellbeing has a significantly raised profile in the context of ongoing curriculum reform.

Learners who are not used to the feeling of struggle and failure are likely to crumble when faced with a task or approach that does not entail a straightforward correct answer. As practitioners, we have a responsibility to ensure that our more able learners are regularly exposed to a high-enough level of challenge to experience the feeling of struggle, in an environment where they feel part of a supportive learning community. 

In my ‘other life’ (beyond teaching) I have worked as a musical director in theatre for nearly 15 years, and I feel that the expressive arts provide so many opportunities for this kind of development. I am always looking for ways to explore and use the arts in my pedagogical approach, and have found the following approaches to be particularly successful for more able learners: 

1. Draw on creative role models to develop growth mindset

Carol Dweck’s theory of growth mindset is important to helping learners understand the benefits of ‘staying with’ a task or problem, even when it feels beyond their ability – and here, there is much to be learned from the world of expressive arts.

Many artists and musicians spend weeks, months, even years perfecting a work. Even the process of rehearsing for a performance (be it a school concert, instrumental examination or West End production) requires dedication and resilience, calling for repetition after repetition to ensure consistency.

For learners it can be powerful to take inspiration from an artist or other celebrity and to understand how they approach their craft. The NACE Essentials guide to learning mindset suggests encouraging learners to “research individuals they admire who have achieved something great and explore what these people have in common.”

In my school, figures such as Walt Disney and J. K. Rowling are year-group models, and pupils learn about how they have created their masterpieces through teamwork, setbacks and extensive editing. Developing a growth mindset permeates our whole school culture and reinforces the idea that “the most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time” (Thomas Edison).

2.  Set creative open-ended tasks

The guidance for more able learners from the regional consortia within which I work suggests “setting creative open-ended tasks” within our everyday practice. I recently used a task which involved playing short excerpts of music and asking children (and staff) to choose the colour they felt the music was describing.

Of course, with this type of task there is no ‘right’ answer, yet the lesson serves many purposes: to encourage reasoning and justification for any answer, to develop child talk in a low-stake environment, and as an introduction to the technical vocabulary required for describing music.

It was particularly interesting to note how many of my more able learners were fixated upon ‘Yes, but who is right Miss?’ and I am already planning further activities using paintings, sculpture and digital art to try and change this mindset.

3. Provide regular mental workouts

In its recent thematic review of provision for more able learners, Estyn recognises a problem in many schools of simply setting more work in terms of quantity, rather than extensions which require deeper thinking.

I try to provide my class with opportunities to think deeply about their academic work, but also to think deeply in an altogether more abstract, creative way. The use of ‘thunk’ questions and ‘cognitive wobble’ are particularly strong ways of encouraging learners to question their own perceptions of the world, and even to challenge information that is presented to them by teachers and parents.

Some of my favourite ‘thunks’ are excellent warm-ups for art, drama and literacy lessons… e.g. If I drop a bucket of paint on a canvas, is it art? What if I drop the bucket deliberately? What colour is Tuesday? If I compose a piece of music, but it is never played, is it still music?

Character studies during drama or literacy lessons also provide opportunities for ‘cognitive wobble’ – the result of conflicting information clashing when we need to form an opinion about something. e.g. We know thieves are villains, and yet Robin Hood is a hero... 

My class last year also took part in a project with a visiting neurologist, who taught the pupils about the brain, and how it works in the same way as any other well-exercised muscle. They learnt about different parts of the brain and how it functions, and many were able to make links with the ongoing work we had done on mindset.

4. Challenge parents to change their perspectives

Finally, I am reminded of a conversation with a parent who had been flicking through a maths book before a parent-teacher consultation. The parent commented on the number of mistakes in the book and expressed concern over their child’s lack of mathematical understanding. The child in question was, in fact, a strong mathematician who really thrived when challenged and was learning to articulate her mistakes and what she had learnt from them.

If we want to reframe the concept of success for our learners, we also need to challenge the perception of ‘right’ answers held by parents – which in many cases is passed on to their children. Ensuring that parents are well informed of the learning culture in a school, particularly that of mindset and deep learning/challenge is crucial in supporting this change.

We have recently introduced Individualised Achievement Plans for our most able learners, which involve a target-/project-setting meeting between learner, teacher and parent, and already we are seeing the benefits of parents’ support when more open-ended tasks are introduced and continued at home.

I was particularly struck by a comment in the NACE Essentials guide to learning mindset: “the risk with more able learners can be that teachers do not sufficiently reward effort, due to success being perceived as a ‘given’ [… A]ll learners need ‘process praise’ to build or reinforce that all-important growth mindset.” This is of course true, and not just of learners at school age. We all need to feel as though our efforts, whether at work or elsewhere, are appreciated, and we are all likely to perform better when praised.

For our young learners, receiving support, praise and encouragement not only at school but also at home can have a huge impact. Engaging with parents to ensure a consistent approach is key.

I recently read an NCETM article titled “The answer is only the beginning”. It seems to me that the more we are able to instil this mindset in our more able learners, the better we equip them for whatever challenges they may face, both academically and throughout their lives.

References and further reading

·         Healthy and happy – school impact on pupils’ health and wellbeing (Estyn, 2019)

·         How best to challenge and nurture more able and talented pupils: Key stages 2 to 4 (Estyn, 2018)

·         Regional Strategy and Guidance for More Able Learners (Education Achievement Services for South Wales, 2018)

·         NACE Essentials: Using mindset theory to drive success (NACE, 2018; login required)

·         The Learning Challenge (James Nottingham, 2017)

·         The Little Book of Thunks (Ian Gilbert, 2007)

NACE member offers: for details of current discounts available from our partner organisations, including education publishers such as Crown House, Hodder, SAGE, Rising Stars and Routledge, log in to our members’ site.

Tags:  creativity  Estyn  mindset  neuroscience  Ofsted  parents and carers  resilience  Wales  wellbeing 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Ofsted update: focus on substance, not “stickers”

Posted By Mike Sheridan, 24 January 2018
Updated: 08 July 2019
In this blog post, Mike Sheridan, Ofsted’s regional director for London, gives an update on Ofsted’s research into the curriculum – emphasising the importance of staying focused on quality of education, rather than qualifications.
 

In my last blog post, I talked about Ofsted’s forthcoming research into the curriculum. Since then, the Chief Inspector, Amanda Spielman, has published a commentary which set out some of our initial findings. If you haven’t had a chance to read it yet, I’d encourage you to do so. In it, Amanda challenges us to think about the substance of education. She writes:
 
“What do we understand to be the real substance of education? When we think about what the core purpose of education is, what comes first to our minds? In recent years, we have thought a great deal about the role of leaders and the importance of teaching. We have also given a great deal of our collective time to exam grades and progress measures. These are undoubtedly important. However, at the very heart of education sits the vast accumulated wealth of human knowledge and what we choose to impart to the next generation: the curriculum.”
 
The final sentence in this quote resonates with me, as I’m sure it will with many of you, because it challenges schools to think about why they do what they do. Let me explain. 

Qualifications versus quality of education

I sometimes wonder if some schools have become so driven by end of key stage measures that they’ve lost their focus on the substance of education. I’d like to encourage teachers and leaders to focus honestly on this and consider if tests and examinations have become an end in themselves, rather than a measure of the quality of education a pupil is receiving.
 
Put another way, when schools are making curriculum decisions, are they primarily concerned about the knowledge and experiences a learner will glean, or the examination outcomes the learner and school will record?
 
Let me be really clear here. I’m not suggesting for a minute that examinations and accountability measures aren’t important. They are both vital and necessary. But where schools are “gaming” the system to the point where the education learners receive is compromised – and we have seen some evidence of this – pupils are the ones losing out.
 
What needs to change? Well, we need to make sure every school’s curriculum is focused on substance (the stuff learners know as a result of their schooling), not “stickers” (qualifications for the sake of qualifications, which add little to their broader knowledge and understanding).
 
There have been some well-rehearsed examples of practice designed to get the “sticker” at the expense of the experience of learners. For example, learners being entered for easy qualifications which add little, if anything, to their knowledge or ability. Or being entered early into mathematics GCSE to secure a grade C, when two years’ study rather than one would give them a deeper understanding, and perhaps prepare them to study mathematics at a higher level.

Make every key stage count

These examples are, thankfully, much less commonly seen in our schools today than they have been in the past, and pupils are getting a better deal because of their demise.
 
However, there are still examples of practice in schools which, despite stemming from good intentions, focus on the importance of qualifications at the expense of experiences. One of these, and the one I really want to highlight, is the narrowing of a broad curriculum to spend more time preparing for tests.
 
We see this happening in two ways. First, in some schools the Year 6 (and sometimes Year 5) curriculum focuses too keenly on passing the tests. I can’t imagine the boredom and frustration some children must feel in this situation, and the missed opportunity to develop their knowledge across a full range of National Curriculum subjects.
 
The second is the shortening of Key Stage 3 and early start of Key Stage 4. While I can see the arguments for this, we shouldn’t lose sight of the importance of KS3, and the rich range of subjects studied during this time. For some learners, this is the last time they will study important subjects such as history, geography or the arts. Are we really saying that losing this breadth early is serving them well? I believe we should be focusing on making KS3 a period in a young person’s life where they are enthused across a full range of subjects, taught well by teachers who are passionate about what they are teaching. At the very least, I would hope those schools that are lengthening KS4 stage have a good reason for doing so. 
 
If we are serious about teaching a rich, knowledge-based curriculum, surely we need to hold our nerve and make decisions with this at the forefront of our minds. At Ofsted we are continuing our research into this, and will publish fuller findings later this year.

Tags:  curriculum  Ofsted  policy 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Ofsted to share good practice for a broad and balanced curriculum

Posted By Mike Sheridan, 22 September 2017
Updated: 08 July 2019

In this blog post for the NACE community, Mike Sheridan, Ofsted’s regional director for London, previews upcoming research commissioned to identify and share good practice to ensure all learners benefit from a broad and balanced curriculum. 
 
Alongside my reflections on changes to school accountability measures – to be published in the upcoming edition of NACE Insight magazine – I want to make a point that I hope many of you will agree with. Examinations are an important measure within education, but they shouldn’t be seen as the sole or driving purpose of education. Examination results give an indication of the quality of an education, but there is a worry that schools sometimes focus more on the exam itself, rather than the knowledge and skills it is testing.
 
Earlier this year, the Chief Inspector expressed her concern that too many schools aren’t giving pupils this broad and balanced curriculum, instead focusing very narrowly on exam subjects to ensure the best possible grades. In light of this, she commissioned a piece of research on the curriculum.
 
This piece of work is looking at how schools interpret the curriculum, to see what is effective and what isn’t. We will share the good practice we find (of which there is much!), but where students aren’t getting a good deal, we want to ensure this is made clear as well. We will publish our initial findings soon.
 
Rather than being seen as a threat, I hope this research will help calm the anxiety some feel is created by an excessive focus on tests and exams. My belief is that a great curriculum leads to well-rounded individuals who get good grades because they have the knowledge, skills, character and resilience to do well in exams and in life. If you believe the same to be true, perhaps now is the time to be brave so that we can transform our good education system into a world class one. One which fully equips our young people to confidently compete on the world stage.

Watch this space for Mike’s commentary on Ofsted’s upcoming research publication on this topic, and contact us to share your own school’s approach to delivering a broad and balanced curriculum.

Tags:  curriculum  Ofsted  policy 

PermalinkComments (0)