Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Register
Leadership and governance
Blog Home All Blogs
Collection of blog posts for and by school leaders, to support the development and maintenance of a whole-school culture of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes examples of effective school improvement initiatives, guidance for those in a range of leadership roles, updates on the latest national policy and education research, and inspiring thought leadership pieces from across the NACE network.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: school improvement  leadership  policy  curriculum  aspirations  CPD  Wales  collaboration  disadvantage  research  assessment  CEIAG  lockdown  underachievement  access  resilience  wellbeing  Challenge Framework  Challenge Award  enrichment  parents and carers  myths and misconceptions  Ofsted  self-evaluation  student voice  transition  campaigns  character  Estyn  higher education 

The new Ofsted reports: focus on curriculum design, depth and progression

Posted By Elaine Ricks-Neal, 11 November 2019

NACE Challenge Award Adviser Elaine Ricks-Neal reviews emerging trends from the first round of Ofsted reports under the new education inspection framework (EIF).

There’s certainly a very different feel to the new Ofsted reports. Whilst they are clearly written with parents in mind – reflected in the use of accessible terminology and avoidance of too much detail in the published reports – there is no doubt that schools’ curriculum design and delivery is under forensic scrutiny. And although there is little explicit reference to more able learners, the importance of high-quality provision for this group is implicit in the strong focus on curriculum planning, subject-level provision, and breadth and depth of learning.

Style and structure of the new reports

The reports are written in a surprisingly simple style which Ofsted has said is intended to be parent-friendly, getting right to the point and largely steering clear of education jargon – for example, “The school is not a results factory.”

Both section 8 and section 5 reports look very similar, each opening with a short paragraph addressing the question “What is it like to attend this school?” – summing up the school ethos, behaviour, attendance and day-to-day opportunities. In most cases, the report’s opening statements are positive, but any issue linked with behaviour or low standards will be simply – even bluntly – highlighted; for example, “Pupils enjoy school, but they should be doing much better.”

The reports then move on to the main section: “What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?” – bundling together judgements for the quality of education, personal development, and leadership and management. This can make it quite hard to tease out the reasons for any difference in section 5 judgements of any of these strands.

Finally, there is a paragraph on safeguarding, followed by improvement points.

What key themes are emerging?

·         Focus on curriculum design and subject plans

The reports may have a simple style, but it’s clear that curriculum plans and schemes of work have really been unpicked to check how well “subject leaders plan the curriculum so that pupils build on their knowledge so that they know and remember more”. If your curriculum is not coherent and well thought-through, there is no hiding place. Not surprisingly, a very frequent weakness is that subject planning is not “precisely planned and sequenced.” In primary schools this is often in foundation subjects. There is also real drilling down into phonics, the reading curriculum, mathematics and the quality of SEND provision.

If standards are referred to, which is not the case in all reports, it is usually a simple broad comment – for example, “pupils achieve well” – and linked back to how well subjects are planned and taught. This doesn’t mean results are not deemed important, and schools which have dropped a grade will usually have a critical comment about standards, but the emphasis is on the impact of curriculum and the way it is planned and taught in bringing about those outcomes.

·         Warnings against curriculum narrowing

In secondary schools, there is the same focus on sequential planning, but also criticism of any perceived curriculum narrowing or lack of entitlement, especially for SEND and disadvantaged pupils. Also under scrutiny are the two-year KS3, low EBacc uptake and sixth-formers who are not accessing work experience. This may be unsettling for many secondary schools who might feel they will now need a curriculum rethink to avoid Ofsted disapproval.

In primary schools, if pupils miss lessons for intervention sessions, a judgement may be made as to whether they are missing out too much on the full curriculum.

What about more able learners?

There is no doubt that breadth and depth of learning is highly valued in this framework and that must be good news for more able learners. Though there is not much explicit reference to able learners, there is a strong focus on how well plans build on what learners already know, and where schools do less well, there is typically a reference to work being “too easy for some” or lack of challenge. 
 
A good deal of attention is also paid to the depth of teachers’ subject knowledge and the need for learners to have access to “demanding” reading texts. Schools which do very well are complimented for adapting lesson plans well, having an “ambitious curriculum”, or learning being sequenced to develop “deep understanding” with teachers “building on what pupils already know to achieve the highest standards” (examples from an outstanding school judgement).
 
So, the focus on more able learners is there, though not as we saw it before due to the new “general audience” style of the reports. It is clear that inspectors are digging much deeper than the brevity of the reports might suggest, with a strong focus on the substance and quality of the curriculum and the day-to-day experience. This should ultimately benefit all learners, including the most able.

Tags:  curriculum  leadership  Ofsted  parents and carers  policy  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Diweddariad Estyn: effaith ysgol ar iechyd a lles disgyblion

Posted By Mark Campion HMI, 17 October 2019

Click here to read in English.

Nid yw mynd i’r afael â materion sy’n effeithio ar blant a phobl ifanc, fel bwlio, gordewdra a thlodi, yn hawdd i athrawon. Yn yr ysgol, profiadau bob dydd disgyblion sy’n cael yr effaith fwyaf – p’un a ydynt yn gadarnhaol neu’n negyddol – ar eu hiechyd a’u llesiant. Mewn adroddiad newydd, mae Estyn yn amlygu pwysigrwydd rhoi negeseuon cadarnhaol yn gyson ar draws pob agwedd ar fywyd ysgol.

Mae llesiant disgyblion bob amser wedi bod yn faes sy’n ganolog i’n harolygiadau. Ac, wrth i ysgolion ddatblygu’u meysydd dysgu a phrofiad yn barod ar gyfer y cwricwlwm newydd, bydd y ffocws ar lesiant yn gryfach fyth. Mae’r cwricwlwm newydd yn cydnabod bod iechyd a llesiant corfforol, meddyliol ac emosiynol da yn sylfaen i ddysgu llwyddiannus.

Mae ein hadroddiad yn dwyn ynghyd wybodaeth o amrywiaeth o ffynonellau gwahanol, gan olygu bod ambell ran enbyd ynghylch profiadau disgyblion eu hunain, gan gynnwys ysmygu, yfed ac iechyd rhyw.

Darganfuom fod negeseuon am iechyd a llesiant mewn gwersi, gwasanaethau ac mewn polisïau yn yr ysgolion gorau yn gyson â phrofiad bob dydd disgyblion.

Lle i gymdeithasu, diwylliant anogol, cyfleoedd pleserus i fod yn weithgar yn gorfforol, gofal bugeiliol amserol a gwaith cadarnhaol gyda rhieni, dyma rai o’r dulliau sydd, o’u cyfuno, yn cynorthwyo disgyblion i fod yn unigolion iach a hyderus, yn barod i fyw bywyd boddhaus.

Mae diwylliant anogol, lle y mae perthnasoedd cadarnhaol yn galluogi disgyblion i ffynnu, yn hanfodol i gryfhau iechyd a llesiant pobl ifanc. Ni ddylid tanamcangyfrif y pethau bach y mae athrawon da yn eu gwneud, fel gwenu a chyfarch disgyblion yn ôl enw ar ddechrau’r diwrnod neu wers unigol. Maent yn helpu disgyblion i deimlo’u bod yn cael eu gwerthfawrogi ac yn annog meddylfryd cadarnhaol.

Ystyriwch p’un a yw dull eich ysgol yn gyson ar draws bob agwedd ar ei gwaith. A oes gan yr ysgol:

  • Bolisïau ac arferion sy’n sicrhau bod disgyblion yn gwneud cynnydd da yn eu dysgu?
  • Arweinwyr sy’n ‘gwneud y dweud’ ynghylch cefnogi iechyd a llesiant disgyblion?
  • Diwylliant anogol, lle y mae perthnasoedd cadarnhaol yn galluogi disgyblion i ffynnu?
  • Cymuned ac ethos cynhwysol?
  • Gwybodaeth fanwl am iechyd a llesiant disgyblion sy’n dylanwadu ar bolisïau a chamau gweithredu?
  • Amgylchedd a chyfleusterau sy’n hybu iechyd a llesiant da, fel lle i chwarae, cymdeithasu ac ymlacio amser egwyl?
  • Cwricwlwm eang a chytbwys, sy’n cynnwys profiadau dysgu unigol, yn seiliedig ar dystiolaeth, sy’n hybu iechyd a llesiant?
  • Gofal bugeiliol cefnogol ac ymyriadau targedig i ddisgyblion sydd angen cymorth ychwanegol?
  • Cysylltiadau effeithiol ag asiantaethau allanol?
  • Partneriaethau agos â rhieni a gofalwyr?
  • Dysgu proffesiynol parhaus i’r holl staff, sy’n eu galluogi i gefnogi iechyd a llesiant disgyblion?

Mae arfer dda’n cael ei hamlygu drwy astudiaethau achos yn yr adroddiad. Mewn ysgolion uwchradd, yn benodol, nid yw profiad bob dydd disgyblion o iechyd a llesiant bob amser yn cyfateb i nodau sy’n cael eu datgan gan arweinwyr ysgol. Ond, fe wnaeth Ysgol Uwchradd y Dwyrain yng Nghaerdydd wella arweinyddiaeth yr ysgol yn llwyddiannus a chafodd hyn effaith gadarnhaol amlwg ar y diwylliant a’r gefnogaeth ar gyfer llesiant disgyblion. Mae ei diwylliant yn cydnabod bod pobl ifanc o hyd yn datblygu’n gorfforol, yn feddyliol ac yn emosiynol a bod gan athrawon gyfrifoldeb i fynd i’r afael ag anghenion datblygiadol y plentyn cyfan. Hefyd, mae’r ysgol yn nodi mai o ddealltwriaeth athro o’r ffordd y mae pobl ifanc yn dysgu y mae arbenigedd yr athro yn deillio, yn hytrach na dim ond ei wybodaeth bynciol.

Yn Ysgol Gynradd Gilwern, Sir Fynwy, mae ei hymagwedd at gefnogi disgyblion agored i niwed wedi helpu staff i ddeall yn well y rhesymau sydd wrth wraidd diffyg hunan-barch neu ymddygiad annymunol.

Mae iechyd a lles yn nodwedd bwysig o gyflawni pedwar diben y cwricwlwm newydd mewn ysgolion. Mae gan ysgolion gyfle nawr, yn fwy nag erioed, i gynnig buddion gydol oes i blant a phobl ifanc yng Nghymru.

Mae’r adroddiad llawn ar gael ar estyn.llyw.cymru ac mae’n argymell ffyrdd y gall ysgolion, awdurdodau lleol, consortia rhanbarthol, darparwyr addysg gychwynnol athrawon a’r llywodraeth wella iechyd a llesiant disgyblion. Gall athrawon ac arweinwyr ddefnyddio astudiaethau achos yr adroddiad i ysbrydoli newidiadau yn eu hysgolion eu hunain.

Tags:  Estyn  leadership  policy  research  resilience  Wales  wellbeing 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Estyn update: school impact on pupils’ health and wellbeing

Posted By Mark Campion HMI, 17 October 2019

Cliciwch yma i ddarllen yn y Gymraeg.

Estyn’s Mark Campion HMI shares key findings from the inspectorate’s recent report “Healthy and happy – school impact on pupils’ health and wellbeing”.

Tackling issues that affect children and young people, such as bullying, obesity and poverty isn’t easy for teachers. In school, it is the everyday experiences of pupils that have the greatest impact – positive or negative – on their health and wellbeing. In a new report, Estyn highlights the importance of giving consistently positive messages across all aspects of school life. Here, the inspectorate explores what it takes to help pupils be healthy and happy.

Pupils’ wellbeing has always been an area at the heart of our inspections. And as schools develop their areas of learning experience in readiness for the new curriculum, the focus on wellbeing will be even stronger. The new curriculum recognises that good physical, mental and emotional health and wellbeing underpins successful learning.

Our report brings together insights from a range of different sources, making for stark reading in parts about pupils’ own experiences including smoking, drinking and sexual health.

We found that in the best schools, messages about health and wellbeing in lessons, assemblies and in policies are consistent with pupils’ everyday experience.

Space to socialise, a nurturing culture, enjoyable opportunities to be physically active, timely pastoral care and positive work with parents are just some of the approaches that collectively support pupils to be healthy, confident individuals, ready to lead fulfilling lives.

A nurturing culture, where positive relationships enable pupils to thrive is essential to strengthen young people’s health and wellbeing. The little things that good teachers do like smiling and greeting pupils by name at the start of the day or an individual lesson should not be underestimated. They help pupils feel valued and encourage a positive mindset.

Consider whether the approach of your school is consistent across all aspects of its work. Does the school have:

  • Policies and practices that ensure pupils make good progress in their learning?
  • Leaders who ‘walk the talk’ about supporting pupils’ health and wellbeing?
  • A nurturing culture, where positive relationships allow pupils to thrive?
  • An inclusive community and ethos?
  • Detailed knowledge about pupils’ health and wellbeing that influence policies and actions?
  • An environment and facilities that promote good health and wellbeing, such as space to play, socialise and relax at break times?
  • A broad and balanced curriculum that includes discrete, evidence-based learning experiences that promote health and wellbeing?
  • Supportive pastoral care and targeted interventions for pupils that need additional support?
  • Effective links with external agencies?
  • Close partnerships with parents and carers?
  • Continuing professional learning for all staff that enables them to support pupils’ health and wellbeing?

Inspiring good practice is highlighted through case studies in the report. In secondary schools, in particular, pupils’ day-to-day experience of health and wellbeing does not always match school leaders’ stated aims. But Eastern High School in Cardiff successfully improved the leadership of the school which had a notably positive effect on the culture and support for pupils’ wellbeing. Their culture recognises that young people are still developing physically, mentally and emotionally and that teachers have a responsibility to address the developmental needs of the whole child. The school also identifies that a teacher’s expertise lies in their understanding of how young people learn rather than simply their subject knowledge.

At Gilwern Primary School, Monmouthshire (a longstanding NACE member), the school’s approach to supporting vulnerable pupils has helped staff to better understand the reasons behind poor self-esteem or undesirable behaviour.

Health and wellbeing is an important feature in achieving the four purposes of the new curriculum in schools. Schools have the opportunity now more than ever to provide lifelong benefits to the children and young people in Wales.

The full report is available at estyn.gov.wales and recommends ways that schools, local authorities, regional consortia, initial teacher education providers and government can improve pupils’ health and wellbeing. Teachers and leaders can use the report’s case studies to inspire changes in their own schools.

Tags:  Estyn  leadership  policy  research  resilience  Wales  wellbeing 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Ofsted update: new inspection framework released

Posted By Chris Jones, 17 May 2019
Updated: 08 July 2019
Chris Jones, Director of Corporate Strategy at Ofsted, shares an update for the NACE community on the results of the consultation on proposed changes to the education inspection framework.
 
Earlier this month we published the outcome of our consultation on a new education inspection framework. I’m really pleased to say that around three-quarters of parents, teachers and headteachers supported our plans to focus on the real substance of education, the curriculum.
 
We have introduced three new inspection judgements alongside leadership and management: “quality of education”, “behaviour and attitudes”, and “personal development”. These changes are good news for all pupils, including the most able. At their heart is ensuring that all schools focus on giving children the education they deserve.
 
Through the new "quality of education" judgement inspectors will look at what is learned through the curriculum, how well it is taught and assessed, and the impact it has on learners. In practice, this means we will be spending less time looking at tests and exam data, and instead considering how schools have achieved their results through a broad, rich curriculum and real learning, rather than teaching to the test and exam cramming.
 
The “behaviour and attitudes” judgement will assess whether leaders are creating a calm and orderly environment, where bullying is tackled effectively by leaders when it occurs. The “personal development” judgement will recognise what schools do to build young people’s resilience and confidence in later life, including through participation in sport, music and extracurricular activities.
 
Together, these changes will make it easier for Ofsted to recognise and reward early years providers, schools and colleges that are doing the best they can for their pupils, particularly those working in challenging circumstances.
 
I want to thank all organisations and individuals that took time to tell us what they think about the proposals – the consultation has had the biggest response in Ofsted’s history. The new inspection regime will take effect from September this year.
 
Share your views: communications@nace.co.uk

Tags:  curriculum  Ofsted  policy 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

New Curriculum for Wales: four questions for MAT provision

Posted By Rhys Jones, 16 May 2019
Updated: 07 August 2019
Following the recent publication of the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022, Rhys Jones, Headteacher of Treorchy Comprehensive School, explores how the changes will impact on provision for more able and talented (MAT) learners.

As a Professional Learning Pioneer School we have been involved in the development of the new Curriculum for Wales and its supporting actions and agencies since its inception. Specifically, we are tasked with helping to research, understand and develop the pedagogy to teach the new curriculum; to collaborate with the Curriculum Pioneers to develop the draft Areas of Learning and Experience (AoLEs); and to support non-pioneer schools (known as partner schools) in their preparation for the new curriculum.

Drawing on our longstanding relationship with NACE, consideration of MAT learners has been a core focus in our co-construction work on the new curriculum – including consideration of the following questions:

1. Will the new curriculum help schools identify and challenge MAT learners?

The progression framework in each AoLE spans the age range from three to 16; the new curriculum works on a continuum rather than being split into key stages like the current national curriculum. Although the five progression steps outlined in the “what matters” statements provided for each AoLE are loosely related to ages, teachers are encouraged to look at the whole span of progression. This means that MAT learners in each area will be challenged to work at an appropriately high level.

An example may be seen in the expressive arts AoLE. If a pupil is a MAT musician, they might already be demonstrating performance skills from Progression Step 4 or 5 quite early in their school career and this is readily accepted and promoted by the Curriculum for Wales.

2. How will the new curriculum impact on primary/secondary collaboration?

It is anticipated that there will be much closer collaboration between primary and secondary schools. As mentioned above, the concept of the curriculum as a continuum without key stages is a central principle. It is anticipated that there will be co-construction in terms of planning, implementation and assessment. The primary and secondary sectors will need to learn from one another if the curriculum is to be successful.

Because of the continuum in terms of ongoing and formative assessment, information about MAT pupils will be easily available to all schools at this key transition point.

3. Will the new curriculum offer opportunities for MAT learners?

It should offer opportunities in all AoLEs. Two key strands to highlight at this stage are extracurricular activities and authentic pupil-led learning.

Across the curriculum the artificial divide between extracurricular and curricular activities is being removed. Recognition of the significance of a wide range of rich activities for pupils of all abilities, and of course for our MAT pupils, is positively encouraged in the new curriculum.

This connects to the idea of providing authentic activities in which to base pupils’ learning. Giving learners a voice to help decide the direction of their learning will encourage ownership of learning both inside and outside the classroom.

Both of these examples provide opportunities for our MAT learners, who are particularly likely to appreciate and benefit from independent self-determination in authentic settings.

4. Will teachers need to work differently with MAT learners?

At Treorchy, we would say we have a great tradition of working differently with MAT learners; differentiation by its nature implies working differently.

Because of the innovations mentioned above and because of the greater balance between knowledge, skills and experience, the new curriculum should give us even greater freedom to work with MAT pupils.

Tags:  assessment  collaboration  curriculum  policy  progression  transition  Wales 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

New Curriculum for Wales: the freedom to let learners fly

Posted By Jon Murphy, 16 May 2019
Updated: 09 September 2020

Jon Murphy, Executive Headteacher of Llanfoist Fawr and Llanvihangel Crucorney Primary Schools, explains why he’s optimistic about the new freedoms presented by the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022.

While observing an inspiring Year 5 lesson as part of an assessment for the NACE Challenge Award, my eye was drawn to a statement above the whiteboard: “Who says the sky’s the limit when there are footsteps on the moon?” Push beyond our thin and fragile atmosphere, escape the boundaries created by gravity and a whole new exciting world of exploration, discovery and possibility emerges. Those words have remained with me and have become a guiding principle in my work with more able and talented (MAT) children.  

The national curriculum defines parameters within which to operate, bringing both benefits and limitations. Key phases create their own “gravity” which can hold teachers and learners within fixed boundaries. Over-prescribed curriculum content stifles creativity, exploration and discovery, particularly for those with an independent spirit and capability. Boundaries create barriers to learning.

However, with the new Curriculum for Wales, we are being provided with the wonderful opportunity to change the way we teach our young people. We are on the verge of the introduction of a totally different approach, which promises the removal of boundaries, resulting in the creation of exciting educational discoveries that will challenge the way we think, the way we teach and the way we prepare our young people for the future. The significant change needed for curriculum reform will challenge us as professionals and by the same token will allow us the freedom to transform the way we challenge our more able learners.

The story so far…

30 April 2019 saw the publication of the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022. Within the Federation of Llanfoist Fawr and Llanvihangel Primary Schools, preparation for curriculum reform started long before the publication of the draft orders. Professor Graham Donald’s Successful Futures report, the catalyst which led to curriculum reform, provided the starting point for our own journey of curriculum transformation. We followed its progression through to the white paper, Our National Mission: A Transformational Curriculum, which gave us sight of the legislative proposals for Curriculum Wales 2022. 


Although the details of the new Curriculum for Wales have only recently become available to all schools in draft form, carefully considered strategic planning has provided us with a head start in our preparations for implementation. Fundamental to the new curriculum are the Four Purposes which guide educational priorities and underpin teaching and learning to ensure learners become:

  • Ambitious, capable learners who are ready to learn throughout their lives;
  • Enterprising, creative contributors who are ready to play a full part in life and work;
  • Ethical, informed citizens who are ready to be citizens of Wales and the world;
  • Healthy, confident individuals who are ready to lead fulfilling lives as valued members of society.

Already the Four Purposes are a regular and natural part of the everyday new curriculum vocabulary used by pupils and staff. The purposes chime so well with the aspirations we have always held for our more able learners. We have created a vision and aims that are aligned to the purposes of the new curriculum, and although early days, we are already striving to ensure our vision ultimately comes to fruition through the introduction of new pedagogical approaches. We have moved away from the traditional subject coordinator role and allocated staff to the six Areas of Learning and Experience (AoLE) – expressive arts; health and wellbeing; humanities; literacy, languages and communication; mathematics and numeracy; science and technology – creating curriculum teams which bring together colleagues’ existing skills, knowledge and expertise.

Preparing for change: the role of the PLL

Although not a Pioneer School involved in the initial shaping of the curriculum, we have worked closely with our Pioneer colleagues to keep abreast of innovation and change. Pivotal to our work with Pioneer Schools has been the internal appointment of a Professional Learning Lead (PLL) – an initiative introduced by the South East Wales Consortium (EAS). Due to the significant changes in pedagogical approach needed to deliver the new Curriculum for Wales, it is essential to appoint a PLL with extensive skills, knowledge and experience in child development to ensure the curriculum is designed to meet the needs of every individual pupil, regardless of ability.

In addition to success as a subject leader across a number of areas, our own PLL has extensive experience as an Additional Learning Needs Coordinator and is also our More Able and Talented Coordinator. A key role for the PLL is to oversee the development of the 12 Pedagogical Principles across the six AoLEs, which are at the heart of curriculum reform. Currently our PLL is developing staff knowledge and understanding of the “what matters” concepts in each AoLE – headline statements that outline and organise learning. The “what matters” statements make connections to the Four Purposes to ensure learners acquire the appropriate knowledge, skills and experiences in each AoLE.

An operational starting point for staff has been involvement in the redesign of our planning templates to address the elements of the new curriculum framework. We are now making our first attempts to pilot planning and curriculum design for delivery of the new AoLEs.

Ensuring consistency and coherence

Successful implementation of the new national curriculum will be dependent on the quality of professional development provided for staff, upskilling them in the pedagogical approaches needed for effective delivery. Our PLL attends curriculum reform professional development opportunities facilitated by Pioneer colleagues, the EAS and other providers. She acts as a conduit bringing back into school new developments and good practice to be shared in senior leadership, staff and governors’ meetings and through facilitating school professional development days.

As a school we are already finding that professional development gained through participation in the NACE Challenge Development Programme is complementing and enhancing our curriculum reform work. We are looking at change holistically, and as a result we are carefully aligning curriculum reform with other work streams, including our transition to the six elements of the revised NACE Challenge Framework and amendment of our self-evaluation processes to address Estyn’s five inspection areas. This strategic alignment of the different systems and processes we use in school is ensuring that they work together as a coherent whole.

The freedom to let learners fly

Within the draft orders for the new curriculum are details of the principles for progression. These guide the progression of learning within each of the six AoLEs; the outlined progression steps contain achievement outcomes which can be used to identify progression of what a pupil can do as they progress in their learning. Unlike the current curriculum, which almost ties learning into key phases demarked by outcomes and levels, the progression steps are a true continuum and allow children to progress more in line with their ability – without the boundaries which can suppress progress. For more able learners there are no false ceilings; they can fly. 

Teachers will need to teach differently, developing new pedagogy, assessment processes and the confidence to “let go of the reins”. Young people will have a greater say in what and how they learn. Enrichment and experiences which are an integral part of the new curriculum will allow learners to have a greater voice in how they design, guide, investigate and lead their own learning: a tantalising thought for more able learners, who will be provided with even greater opportunities to spread their wings. Through the freedom intended in the new curriculum, Welsh Government is handing us the scissors with which to cut the apron strings.

Grounds for optimism

The new Curriculum for Wales will provide a continuum of learning; the restrictive key phases present in the current curriculum will no longer exist. Transition will become smoother but at the same time will require even greater partnership and tighter transition plans to ensure a successful and seamless move for pupils from primary to secondary schools. With a learning continuum, it follows that work, which has traditionally been seen as the domain of the secondary sector, will permeate its way more readily into primary practice, an exciting prospect for more able learners who will access increasingly challenging concepts earlier in their primary career.

There is a great deal of optimism in Wales surrounding the introduction of a new curriculum. Naturally, there are concerns about resourcing and the pace and extent of change. Overall, educational professionals realise that we are on the verge of a new educational system that is non-prescriptive, boundary-free and which offers the freedom to develop learning opportunities that are genuinely bespoke to meet the needs of all learners, preparing them for work and life. We all have a lot to gain from current educational reform, and none more so than more able and talented learners.

Tags:  aspirations  curriculum  leadership  policy  progression  school improvement  Wales 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

DfE update: Approaches to Supporting Disadvantaged Pupils

Posted By David Warden, Department for Education, 14 January 2019
Updated: 08 April 2019
Following the publication of the report Approaches to Supporting Disadvantaged Pupils, the Department for Education's David Warden, Curriculum Implementation Unit: Humanities, Arts, Languages, and Most Able, shares the following update for NACE members.
 
The Department for Education is committed to unlocking the potential of every child and there is evidence that disadvantaged, highly able pupils fall behind their non-disadvantaged peers between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4. Many of the department's recent reforms, such as new accountability measures and more stretching tests and qualifications, will help – but more needs to be done to support highly able children at risk of underachieving.
 
In November 2018 a University of Warwick research report, Approaches to Supporting Disadvantaged Pupils, was published. This research, commissioned by the Department for Education (DfE), took place in the spring and summer terms of the 2017-18 academic year. It aimed to identify what secondary schools across England were doing to support attainment amongst the most able disadvantaged students from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4. It had a particular focus on schools where these pupils were making better than average progress.
 
The policy context was a focus on closing the attainment gap in schools as part of wider efforts to increase social mobility. Previous research had identified disadvantaged pupils who attained in the top 10% at the end of primary school as being much less likely than their more advantaged peers to achieve highly at the end of Key Stage 4.
 
This study has demonstrated that English secondary schools in diverse settings and with diverse pupil populations can be successful in promoting high achievement of their most able disadvantaged students across Key Stages 2 to 4. We hope that schools will view it as providing useful ideas about how they might adopt similar approaches to support their most able disadvantaged pupils to achieve their potential.
 
The full report is available here.
 

Tags:  DfE  disadvantage  policy  research  underachievement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Using historic outcomes to target improvement

Posted By Ann McCarthy, 04 December 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
How effective is your use of school data? Ahead of her upcoming workshop “Using data to inform learning and secure high achievement”, NACE associate Dr Ann McCarthy shares guidance on the use of historic outcomes to target improvement in outcomes for all learners, including the more able.

This area is led by headteachers and senior leadership teams who set strategy, policy, school improvement plans and quality assurance arrangements. Senior leaders also develop middle leaders so they too can contribute to school priorities, extending the vision and policy into their areas of responsibility.

Based on effective school review and self-evaluation, school leaders highlight areas for development and improvement. They set targets which include the quality and range of school provision, progress and achievement of more and exceptionally able learners. They introduce new initiatives and practices with measurable outcomes, and promote action research to enable them to explore and implement the most effective strategies and practice.

It is important to set quantitative targets so the impact of actions can be measured objectively. This information can then be supplemented by qualitative measures of performance. Learners’ attainment and achievement targets are used to ensure all, including the most able, make appropriate progress across year groups and over time.

Six steps to implement in your school

  1. Put in place an action plan in response to self-evaluation and research evidence, which includes performance measures.
  2. Set whole-school end of key stage targets, using national benchmarks, which can be measured.
  3. Use the same or higher targets for interim school years.
  4. Set quantitative performance data targets, with attention to closing gaps in achievement between different year groups and subjects.
  5. Include targets for defined groups of learners including: gender; ethnicity; EAL; SEND and disadvantage.
  6. Identify other schools where performance is better in target areas and seek to work in collaboration or acquire support, dependent on needs.
In general, leaders would expect to see a small variation in the performance profile between year groups. This allows leaders to target marginal improvement year on year using existing data. However, where there is a significant variation in the prior performance of any given year group, these targets should be adjusted to reflect the differences.

Reviewing outcomes for more able learners

The following questions, regarding more able learners, should be considered:
  • Are historic attainment outcomes in line with or better than average for similar schools or family of schools? 
  • What actions will lead to higher attainment and what quality assurance milestones can be put in place?
  • Do more able learners make the same or better progress than other learners, relative to their starting points, and is this true regardless of learner groups?
  • Have targets been put in place for all year groups and for all subjects?
  • Are there any subjects or year groups where progress and attainment measures lie below whole-school targets and what specific action is in place to monitor and measure improvement?
  • Have the targets been communicated effectively to middle leaders and have they acted to make changes which will lead to further improvements?
  • When reflecting on the school’s position in relation to more able learners, there is a balance between where the school has been historically and what might be achieved if all barriers were removed.
This article is an excerpt from the NACE Essentials guide "Using data to improve provision for more able learners". To access this guide and the full NACE Essentials range, log in as a member.

Tags:  leadership  policy  school improvement  self-evaluation 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Summer 2018: education reports roundup

Posted By Hilary Lowe, 04 September 2018
Updated: 22 December 2020

The wheels of education research and policy continue to turn even when school’s out… To help you catch up and prepare for the new academic year, NACE Education Adviser Hilary Lowe summarises key takeaways from this summer’s education report releases.

School cultures and practices: supporting the attainment of disadvantaged pupils

Department for Education, May 2018

This qualitative research study compares cultures and practices in schools that perform well and less well for disadvantaged pupils, in and outside of London. It provides insights into practices that could be encouraged to improve the attainment of disadvantaged pupils.

Five key cross-cutting findings are identified:

  1. School cultures and practices vary more by a school’s performance than by location.
  2. Lower-performing primary schools outside London are most different from other schools.
  3. High-performing schools, regardless of location, adopt a wide range of approaches to supporting disadvantaged pupils.
  4. High-performing schools, regardless of location, are positive and solutions-focused.
  5. There is a subtle but discernible “London culture”.

The main characteristics of high-performing schools for disadvantaged pupils are identified as:

  • Shared sense of purpose
  • Use of data
  • Engaging parents
  • High-quality teaching
  • Strong and visionary leadership

The report gives specific examples in these five areas and makes recommendations for further research.

In the coming academic year, NACE’s own research will include a focus on effective practice in Challenge Award-accredited schools which perform well for disadvantaged more able learners.

Use and perceptions of curriculum support resources in schools

Department for Education, July 2018

This report examines:

  • The curriculum support resources being used most often by schools and teachers
  • How teachers judge the quality of curriculum support resources
  • Gaps and priorities for the development of future curriculum support resources

Some common trends are identified from interviews with schools:

  • The development of formal whole-school curriculum plans/schemes of work is more common in secondary schools. In primary schools planning relates more to broad themes to be followed according to year group/key stage.
  • Individual lesson planning is undertaken by teachers at both primary and secondary level to structure day-to-day delivery and tailor content to the needs of particular classes.
  • The importance of collaborative working and shared resources is emphasised by teachers and senior leaders in both primary and secondary schools.
  • Social media is growing in popularity as a means of accessing resources and gathering peer feedback. This is particularly the case among early-career teachers who often use social media to share practice, ask for advice and provide tips on finding and developing resources.
  • Resources need to be adaptable to meet the needs of a range of learners and abilities, across a range of areas, including challenge for high-ability learners and those with English as an additional language. It is important to be able to adapt resources to reflect individual teaching styles and learner needs, but also important that resources engage learners and motivate them to think independently.
  • Apps and online software are mentioned as useful tools in maintaining learner engagement through a range of visual, audio and textual aids. Teachers are often able to adapt these resources to match the progress and targets of individual learners.
  • Textbooks and hard-copy resources remain important for providing content, but digital resources are easy to access and often an engaging way for learners to develop skills and understanding. Textbooks are often used as a framework for lesson planning and as a reference tool for learners when conducting independent enquiry. Additional activities are used to supplement textbook content and add differentiation.
  • Overall, it is generally accepted that a range of resources, formats and approaches should be used (rather than teachers depending on one type/format) to ensure curriculum delivery is high quality and works well for both staff and students. Although teachers can access existing resources easily, these are generally viewed as a starting point; they still need to be adapted to meet the needs of learners and to align with individual teaching styles.

 

Potential for success: fulfilling the promise of highly able students in secondary schools

Sutton Trust, August 2018

This report analyses how high-attaining students fare in secondary schools in England. It also explores approaches to maximising the potential of high-attaining young people through analysis of literature and case studies of good practice in schools that do particularly well for these students.

Important points highlighted include:

  • Students from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to be in the top 10% for attainment in English and maths at the end of primary school. Disadvantaged students are three times less likely to be in this high-attainment group than their more advantaged peers: only 4% of disadvantaged students have high attainment at KS2, compared to 13% of non-disadvantaged pupils.
  • Disadvantaged pupils who perform well in primary school are much more likely to fall behind at secondary school, compared to other high-attaining students, across a range of measures. While high attainers overall make about an average level of progress between KS2 and KS4, those from disadvantaged backgrounds fall substantially behind.
  • They are also less likely to achieve the top grades: while 72% of non-disadvantaged high attainers achieve 5 A*-A grades or more at GCSE, only 52% of disadvantaged high attainers do. If high-attaining disadvantaged students performed as well as high-attaining students overall, an additional 1,000 disadvantaged students would achieve at least 5A*-A at GCSE each year.<
  • High attainers from disadvantaged backgrounds who are white have the lowest level of attainment at GCSE compared to their peers in any other ethnic group. Only 45% of disadvantaged white students with high prior attainment gain 5A*-A at GCSE, compared to 63% of black students and 67% of Asian students from similar backgrounds.
  • Students with high attainment do better at GCSE in schools with lower proportions of students on free school meals, schools in London, in converter academies, and in schools with higher numbers of other previously high-attaining students.
  • Disadvantaged students make up a much smaller proportion in grammar schools, compared to comprehensives, with disadvantaged high attainers only half as likely as high attainers overall to enter a grammar. In grammar schools, only 1 in 17 of all high attainers are from disadvantaged backgrounds, compared to 1 in 8 high attainers in comprehensive schools.

Plus…

The government recently announced the creation of a national Centre of Excellence for modern languages, to be supported by leading schools in the field which will become language hubs. Of the nine schools named as language hubs so far, two have attained the NACE Challenge Award – The Broxbourne School in Hertfordshire and Sir William Borlase's Grammar School in Buckinghamshire.

In July, the government also announced new online resources designed to help schools reduce teacher workload, freeing up time from “unnecessary and time-consuming tasks” so more time can be dedicated to teaching. The workload reduction toolkit is available here.

For more research and reports of relevance to schools working to improve provision for more able learners, click here.

Tags:  policy  research 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Estyn’s thematic review of MAT provision: 7 key takeaways

Posted By NACE, 01 May 2018
Updated: 09 April 2019
Estyn’s latest MAT thematic report, Supporting more able and talented pupils – How best to challenge and nurture more able and talented pupils: Key stages 2 to 4, examines standards, provision and leadership in meeting the needs of more able and talented (MAT) learners in primary and secondary schools in Wales.

Following on from Welsh Government’s announcement of fresh funding to support MAT learners, the report underscores the need for a renewed focus on MAT provision. It also provides clear guidance on and examples of effective provision and practice – including many drawn from NACE members and Challenge Award-accredited schools.

Here are 7 key takeaways for schools…

1. Strong leadership at all levels is at the core of effective MAT provision.

The quality of MAT provision and standards achieved is dependent on leadership with a clear vision for MAT and an emphasis on improving standards and provision through highly successful whole-school approaches and strategic planning, together with monitoring and evaluation which ensures that provision meets the needs of MAT learners.

2. Support for MAT learners should consider overall wellbeing, as well as academic factors.

Success in school relies on learners having belief in themselves, persistence and positive attitudes to learning. At NACE, we promote a range of approaches which can support all MAT learners in developing these attributes alongside effective learning for high achievement.

3. Strong subject knowledge underpins high-quality teaching and learning for MAT learners.

Teaching MAT learners effectively requires strong subject knowledge and an understanding of effective MAT pedagogy which deploys a wide teaching repertoire and skilful use of practices such as questioning and assessment.

4. Effective provision is grounded in high expectations and broad and varied learning opportunities.

High expectations correlate strongly with learners’ motivation and achievement, as does learning which enables them to develop to a very high level in academic, sporting, creative and technological skills.

5. Stimulating and challenging learning experiences should be planned with the specific needs and abilities of MAT learners in mind.

Teaching and learning activities should promote learners’ independence, problem-solving, decision-making, thinking and evaluative skills effectively and also develop literacy, numeracy or ICT skills to a high level.

6. Robust analysis of performance, monitoring and target-setting approaches informs effective MAT provision.

This includes clear and systematic procedures for the identification of prior attainment, current achievements and strengths using a wide range of information; the setting of appropriately challenging targets and learning experiences; and monitoring and tracking progress and achievements over time.

7. Staff professional development must support effective provision for MAT learners.

Teachers are at the heart of effective MAT provision. This is at the heart of NACE’s core principles and informs our approach to supporting schools. With a well-established track record in contributing to national policy, guidance and practice in Wales, we are currently strengthening and extending our work in all Welsh regions around the key issues highlighted by Estyn and the Welsh Government MAT policy.
 

Tags:  CPD  Estyn  policy  research  Wales 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 2 of 3
1  |  2  |  3