Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Register
Curriculum, teaching and support
Blog Home All Blogs
Guidance, ideas and examples to support schools in developing their curriculum, pedagogy, enrichment and support for more able learners, within a whole-school context of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes ideas to support curriculum development, and practical examples, resources and ideas to try in the classroom. Popular topics include: curriculum development, enrichment, independent learning, questioning, oracy, resilience, aspirations, assessment, feedback, metacognition, and critical thinking.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: pedagogy  questioning  enrichment  research  independent learning  oracy  curriculum  aspirations  free resources  KS3  cognitive challenge  KS4  assessment  language  literacy  critical thinking  feedback  metacognition  resilience  collaboration  maths  confidence  English  creativity  wellbeing  lockdown  vocabulary  access  mindset  problem-solving 

4 steps to raising aspirations school-wide

Posted By Gemma Quinn, 12 February 2019
Updated: 23 December 2020

In December 2018, Chesterfield High School was accredited with the NACE Challenge Award, in recognition of school-wide high-quality provision for more able learners within a context of challenge for all. Gemma Quinn, Director of Learning for MFL and Challenge Lead, explains why the school decided to focus on raising aspirations, and key steps taken in achieving this.
 
At Chesterfield High School, our students and staff have wholeheartedly benefited from using the NACE Challenge Framework and from NACE visits to school. We fully understand that the majority of a learner’s time in school is spent in the classroom, and therefore it is essential that our provision provides all learners with opportunities for challenge.
 
However, we identified an area beyond the classroom as a key area for development. We wanted to ensure learners go outside their comfort zone, build resilience and take intellectual risks to fully prepare them for life after school. We carried out pupil voice, analysed our data, and we determined that not only did we want students to be inspired to learn in school, but we also wanted to raise aspirations to enable greater transition into the sixth form and beyond.
 
Using the six key elements of the NACE Challenge Framework, we identified three areas – curriculum, teaching and support; communication and partnership; and monitoring and evaluation – as key to developing our provision for, and raising the aspirations of, our learners.
 
For other schools seeking to raise aspirations, we would recommend the following steps:

1. Listen to learners

We collected pupil voice through anonymous questionnaires and pupil interviews. This highlighted some great strengths, such as our ability to listen and take account of the views of our more able learners within a wider context and our ability to increase parental responsibility in supporting their child’s learning outside of school.
 
We are passionate about celebrating all learners’ achievements and strengths in an environment where both staff and learners have high expectations of themselves and of one another. However, by listening to learner feedback we recognised that we needed to provide our learners with greater opportunities to experience the world beyond the classroom to support further success.

2. Embed a whole-school approach

We set actions in place to develop our curriculum to offer breadth, depth and flexibility. We increased our enrichment resources and wider learning opportunities for all, with a focus on raising the aspirations of our learners.
 
In working towards the NACE Challenge Award, our fundamental aim was to ensure that the school’s vision and ethos are at the heart of everything that happens – to ensure “for everyone the best”. To ensure this was implemented across the school, we identified a Challenge Lead Representative. It was envisaged that the Challenge initiative would strengthen the school community’s drive to promote, actively witness and celebrate the progress and achievement of more able learners. As a result, highly able pupils (HAPs) will be motivated to succeed and to participate in all learning opportunities that will positively nurture their academic and personal growth.

3. Involve staff at faculty level

We also identified a HAP Representative in each faculty area, who reported to the whole-school Challenge Lead Representative. The key objectives of the HAP Representatives are to ensure that the achievement and progress of HAPs are consistently monitored and celebrated within their faculty area. Representatives also help to develop their faculty’s approach to HAP teaching and learning in line with whole-school teaching and learning initiatives, thus leading to improved progress and attainment.
 
We created a subject attributes document which included three key strands for each individual subject area. These included characteristics of a HAP, activities that HAPs should do, and how parents can support HAPs.*

4. Provide inspiring examples and role models

We invited an ex-student who is now studying at Cambridge University into school. She was able to give staff a greater understanding of her school experience and how we guided and prepared her for university life. Through discussions, she inspired current learners to think beyond their original choices and to aim for Russell Group universities and Oxbridge. She was also open to keeping in touch with students to mentor and address any questions they had.
 
In addition, we allocated learners with an aspirations mentor who was able to advise them on the application process and subject choices at A-level to maximise their chances of getting a university place. Learners also took part in mock interviews with volunteers in the community in their chosen field of work or study, which increased their confidence and helped to develop their oracy skills.
 
Visits out to universities, including trips to open days’ and residential trips were promoted through our Challenge Lead Representative. Students visited universities around the country and applied for the prestigious Cambridge Shadowing Scheme.

We are proud…

Using the Challenge Framework helped us to identify our strengths and areas for development in more able provision. Through the action plan created as part of our work with the framework, we highlighted actions and the intended impact of these on target groups of learners. We are extremely proud of the steps we have taken to ensure our more able provision allows all our learners to have the best possible life chances.
 
Gemma Quinn is the Director of Learning for MFL and the Challenge Lead at Chesterfield High School. She is an experienced teacher of French and Spanish to KS5 and a skilled coach and mentor. Gemma enjoys working with various subject leaders across the school to improve learner outcomes and looks forward to continuing to support them in the future.

*To view Chesterfield High School's HAPs subject attributes document, log in to our members' resource library and go to the "Identification & transition" section.

Tags:  aspirations  CEIAG  enrichment  higher education  partnerships  student voice 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Rethinking Romeo and Juliet: four free resources for GCSE English

Posted By Charlotte Bourne, Globe Education, 12 February 2019
Updated: 08 April 2019
Shakespeare’s tragic tale of young love rarely fails to capture the imagination, but how can you help learners approach it with a fresh perspective – interrogating, comparing, contextualising and analysing in depth? Charlotte Bourne, Deputy Head of Learning at Shakespeare’s Globe, shares four free resources to breathe new life into your English literature lessons…

Every March, Shakespeare’s Globe becomes a cauldron of excitement as our high-octane, flagship education project, “Playing Shakespeare with Deutsche Bank” begins. We provide 18,000 free tickets to a full-scale Shakespeare production tailored for 11-18 year olds. Alongside this, each year we create a dedicated website that complements and tracks the production. Although our free tickets target London and Birmingham state schools, the website is open to all, completely free, and doesn't require any sign-up; it forms part of the Globe's commitment to making Shakespeare accessible for all. This article highlights four resources from our 2019 website on Romeo and Juliet and explains how these could be used to address the needs of more able learners, within a context of challenge for all. Whilst these explanations focus on GCSE English literature, the resources can all be adapted to provide any learner with the opportunity to “[read], understand and respond to texts... and develop an informed personal response.”

1. Language: director's edit

Our “script machines” display the script of five key scenes from the play, but with a twist: you have the option of showing the director's edit. This enables you to unpick AO2 more organically with learners, because the interplay between language (Shakespeare's text) and form (a script to be edited for the stage) becomes apparent. For example:

Juliet: O, sweet my mother, cast me not away!
Delay this marriage for a month, a week;
Or, if you do not, make the bridal bed
In that dim monument where Tybalt lies.

  • What do the cut lines convey in terms of meaning?
  • What does removing them achieve?
  • What meaning is the director drawing our attention towards, or away from, through this edit?

This serves as a reminder that, in any performance text, there is more than one conscious construct at work. Although learners will need to know the whole text, the “meanings and effects” (AO2) has a greater plurality when considered in this light.

Indeed, this can also lead to discussions around the context: the origins of Shakespeare's writing, shaped by the theatre practices of his day, mean that even modern editions of the same, full play-text may differ. What an audience receives, therefore, is already layered with interpretation.

2. Language: literary terms

This part of the resource gives learners the opportunity to identify where certain literary techniques are being used by Shakespeare, across five key scenes. This can be used as a revision tool, but why not use it to model the thought processes in understanding how these techniques work to create meanings and effects? This moves learners away from the fallacy of technique-spotting, and can be adapted for KS3 and KS4.

With this in mind, several techniques in each scene are broken down into a series of questions, on our Teachers’ Notes page. For example:

  • Tybalt describes the servants as “heartless hinds”. How does this metaphor show that Tybalt has a low opinion of the servants? Use the questions below to support your thinking.
  • What possible meanings does the word “hind” have?
  • How about the word “heartless”? Hint: remember that Shakespeare’s audience would have heard the play; “heartless” could also therefore be heard as “hart-less”. How could this link to “hind”?
  • Consider the effect of the alliteration in making this link.
  • How does this contribute to the servants’ definition of masculinity set up in the opening exchange between Sampson and Gregory?

To extend the challenge, learners could then create their own questions to deconstruct other techniques. Creating these questions demands higher-order thinking, as learners need to be at Bloom's level of “analysis” before attempting this. To scaffold them up to this level of challenge, they could look at how the same technique is deconstructed in a different scene. This has the added benefit of highlighting the nuanced effects of the same technique used in different parts of the text.

3. Research articles: Brooke versus Shakespeare

Brooke's 1562 poem, “The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet”, served as a key source for Shakespeare. So far, so bolt-on AO3. However, this resource allows learners to compare the differences between Shakespeare's prologue and Brooke's “argument”. It highlights how Shakespeare’s drama occurs over just five days, whereas Brooke’s poem unfolds over nine months, and that Juliet’s age is lowered from 16 to 13.

Drawing out these differences allows for rich exploration of writer's craft that cannot be separated from context, required for the top bands at GCSE.

  • Have learners compare the time reference in Brooke's “argument” with Shakespeare's prologue, and discuss what effect this might have.
  • Next, ask learners to find all the references to time within Shakespeare's version; what patterns do they spot? Why is it that time seems to pass so quickly in the play? Consider this also in light of Shakespeare's younger Juliet.
  • What meaning is being created through these marked changes to the original source material? If time is compacted and Juliet is younger, what might this suggest about the speed of young love?
  • How does the adaptation of form – from poem to play – affect how it is received?

4. Character interviews

Providing learners with the opportunity to engage with text in performance is a cornerstone of the work we do, and part of this involves providing access to actors taking part in the production.

Although learners wouldn't need to analyse actors' interpretations in their exam, the character interviews provide a window into hearing how someone else arrived at an informed, personal response (AO1). Questions cover: What are your initial impressions of your character(s)? What have you noticed about your character’s language, i.e. the way they speak to others/about themselves?

Characters are interviewed several times across the production, providing learners with opportunities to reflect on the complex nature of interpretation: how this can be revised with each more detailed exploration of the text.

To access these resources, plus a wealth of additional resources to support a challenging curriculum, visit 2019.playingshakespeare.org. Remember: the website tracks the production so please keep coming back to see what else we have added!

Charlotte Bourne is Deputy Head of Learning at Shakespeare’s Globe, with a focus on learners aged 3-18, plus the educators who support them. The Globe’s on-site Lively Action programme welcomes close to 80,000 learners per year, while its international outreach work sends practitioners to China, the US and Europe. A qualified English teacher and AQA examiner for GCSE Literature, Charlotte has worked closely with ITTs and NQTs across multiple subjects.

Tags:  English  free resources  GCSE  KS3  KS4  literature  Shakespeare 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Unlocking the toolbox of character education

Posted By Jon Murphy, 11 February 2019
Updated: 22 December 2020

NACE member and Challenge Award holder Llanfoist Fawr Primary School has developed a whole-school approach to character education, drawing on its use of the NACE Challenge Framework alongside the SkillForce Prince William Award. Headteacher Jon Murphy explains why the school believes so strongly in character education as a prerequisite for both wellbeing and academic success.

Why focus on character education?

Character education is not an add-on: it is essential for all young people, and the remit of all educators. Schools have a crucial role in preparing young people to withstand the pressures that life presents, to respond resiliently to setbacks and challenges, and to make informed decisions to shape their future lives. Character education provides the toolbox that will allow them to do so.

At Llanfoist Fawr Primary School, we also firmly believe that nurturing non-academic attributes such as resilience, determination and teamwork is a prerequisite to sound learning. Learning only takes place if the conditions are right and children can cope with the pressures and challenges thrown up by school and life beyond school. And until an individual knows themselves and feels happy in their own skin, they cannot fully realise what they are capable of.

Developing a whole-school approach to character education has unequivocally proved to us that this kind of holistic development is essential in preparing children to become effective learners in all areas, be it academic, sporting, artistic, cultural, spiritual, musical or social. 

This goes hand in hand with our use of the NACE Challenge Framework – recognising the importance of character education as a foundation for all learners to develop and achieve at the highest levels of which they are capable.

What does character education look like at Llanfoist Fawr?

There is no single method for developing character-based curriculum provision. At Llanfoist we have aligned our character education work with the NACE Challenge Framework and with the SkillForce Prince William Award (PWA), for which we were selected as a pilot school. The PWA and NACE Challenge Framework complement and enhance each other perfectly, ensuring challenge for all.

External PWA instructors provide whole-class sessions, each exploring a character attribute or “guiding principle” such as reliance, courage or passion. The PWA explores 28 guiding principles through five key themes – personal development, relationships, working, community and environment – using experiential learning. Children engage in practical skills-based activities and are encouraged to review their actions and behaviour in accordance with the guiding principles.

How is this integrated with other areas of learning?

Character development is not a standalone programme and will not succeed as such; it will only succeed in developing productive character traits if it is an integral part of everything we do and everything we believe in. 

Once a guiding principle and its associated behaviours have been taught in a PWA session, children are encouraged to use and apply that character skill across the curriculum. At every opportunity the class teacher reinforces the principles and applies them to other areas of learning. 

The impact can be seen in every lesson; we see children become more resilient, self-regulating and develop self-belief. The guiding principles and associated behaviours become second nature as learners assimilate, value and live them.

What has been the impact for more able learners, and all learners?

Developing character has transformed the life chances of many of our pupils, including the more able, helping to equip them with the social, emotional and academic skills needed to succeed.

As with many of the most effective influencers in education, the impact cannot be measured in a number or score. The results have been seen in the children’s improved emotional health, wellbeing and view of themselves; the happiness they gain through productive learning; the self-belief and confidence that positively radiates from young people who are comfortable in their own skins and daring to be their “best selves”. 

Character development allows learners to discover previously untapped inner strength, skills, talents and self-belief. It has empowered children in our school to understand how best to lead their own learning, to make strong moral choices and to be confident, independent decision makers. Our more able realise what potential they have and are enthusiastic engaged leaders and learners who thrive on the challenges and opportunities afforded them.

As a school we seek innovative, creative and fun approaches to curriculum delivery with guaranteed high-impact learner outcomes. Developing character education has delivered on all fronts. 

Tags:  character  collaboration  confidence  metacognition  mindset  personal development  resilience  wellbeing 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

5 ways to help young people develop “science capital”

Posted By Beth Hawkins, 08 February 2019
Updated: 08 April 2019
Do the young people in your school feel confident engaging with scientific concepts, terminology, experiences and thinking? Do they believe science is “for them”? In this blog post, Science Museum Group (SMG) Academy Manager Beth Hawkins shares five ways teachers can help learners develop “science capital” – promoting more positive perceptions of, attitudes towards and aspirations within the sciences.

To read more about the research behind these recommendations, click here.

1. Personalise and localise your content

The more we can relate science content to what matters in learners’ lives and local communities, the more we can create “light bulb moments” where they can see the personal relevance and feel closer to the topic. This is more than contextualising science through world events or generic examples; it is about taking some time to find out about the current interests and hobbies of the individual learners in your classroom. This might include discussing how forces link to a local fair or a football match, or how understanding the properties of materials or chemical reactions can help when baking or cooking at home.

2. Show how many doors science can open

Many young people see science as a subject that only leads to jobs “doing science” – working alone in a laboratory or in a medical field. Yet from fashion and beauty to sports and entertainment, business or the military, nearly all industries use science knowledge and skills. Demonstrate that science can open doors to any future career, to help young people see the value and benefit of science to their future.

For ideas and guidance on linking learning to the world of work, log in to the NACE members’ site for the NACE Essentials guide to CEIAG for more able learners.

3. Widen perceptions about who does science

Science seems to have a bit of an image problem. If you search online for images of scientists, your screen will be filled with hundreds of images of weird-looking men with wild hair, wearing white lab coats and holding test tubes or something similar. Scientists are often portrayed similarly in the popular culture that children are exposed to every day – it is no wonder many young people find it hard to relate. Take every opportunity to show the diversity of people who use science in their work or daily lives so that learners can see “people like me” are involved in science and it isn’t such an exclusive (or eccentric) pursuit.

4. Maximise experiences across the whole learning landscape

Young people experience and learn science in many different places – at school, at home and in their everyday life. No single place or experience can build a person’s science capital, but by connecting or extending learning experiences across these different spaces, we can broaden learners’ ideas about what science is and open their eyes to the wonders of STEM. Link out-of-school visits and activities back to content covered in the classroom. You could also set small related challenges or questions for learners to investigate at home or in their local area.

5. Engage families and communities

Our research has found that many families see science as simply a subject learned in school, not recognising where and how it relates to skills and knowledge they use every day. All too often we hear parents saying, “I am not a science-y person”, “I was terrible at science in school” or even “You must be such a boffin if you are good at science.” When young people hear those close to them saying such things, it is not surprising that a negative perception of science can start to grow and the feeling “this is not for me” set in.

Encourage learners to pursue science-related activities that involve members of their family at home or in their local community. Model and encourage discussions which link science to young people’s interests – this will help to show the relevance of science and normalise it. For specific ideas, check out The Science Museum’s free learning resources.

Additional reading and resources:

Beth Hawkins is the Science Museum Group (SMG) Academy Manager. She has been working in formal and informal science education for over 22 years, including roles as head of science in two London schools. Since joining the Science Museum, she has developed and delivered training to teachers and STEM professionals nationally and internationally, and led many of the SMG’s learning research to practice projects. The Science Museum Group Academy offers inspirational research-informed science engagement training and resources for teachers, museum and STEM professionals, and others involved in STEM communication and learning.

Tags:  access  aspirations  free resources  science  STEM 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Science capital: what is it and why should schools care?

Posted By Beth Hawkins, 08 February 2019
Updated: 08 April 2019
You’ve probably heard of cultural capital, but what about science capital? In this blog post, Science Museum Group (SMG) Academy Manager Beth Hawkins outlines recent research on young people’s engagement with and attitudes to science – and how understanding this can help schools increase take-up of STEM education and career paths.

At the Science Museum, engaging people from all backgrounds with science, engineering, technology and maths is at the heart of what we do. Over the past six years, we’ve been working with academic researchers on a project called Enterprising Science, using the concept of science capital to better understand how young people from all backgrounds engage with science and how engagement can be increased through different science-related experiences.

Recent research conducted by University College London with over 40,000 young people across the UK found that while many find science interesting, few are choosing to study science post-16, or consider pursuing a career in science. This is because they struggle to see that science is “for them” or relevant to their lives.

Why should we care?

In one way or another, science is continually changing and improving the way we live. It makes and sustains our society and will help us understand and solve the big questions our world faces. It is a creative and imaginative human endeavour, a way of thinking, asking questions and observing the world around us.

As such, science can open doors and can be invaluable in almost any job, across any sector. It is predicted that by 2030 the UK will have over 7 million jobs that need STEM skills, and it has been recognised that science can help broaden young people’s life choices and opportunities by keeping their future options open, especially among lower socioeconomic groups.

What is “science capital”?

Science capital is a measure of your attitude to and relationship with science. It is not just about how much science you “know”; it also considers how much you value science and whether you feel it is “for you” and connected to your life.

Imagine a bag or holdall that carries all the science-related experiences you have had. This includes what you have learned about science; all the different STEM-related activities you have done, such as watching science TV programmes or visiting science museums; all the people you know who use and talk about science; and whether science is something you enjoy and feel confident about.

How can science capital research be used?

At the Science Museum, we’ve been using science capital research to reflect on how we develop and shape our learning programmes and resources for schools and families. The research also underpins the training we deliver for teacher and science professionals through our new Academy.

For schools, the researchers have developed a science capital teaching approach that can be used with any curriculum.

The research suggests a science capital-informed approach can have the following benefits for learners:

  • Improved understanding and recall of science content
  • Recognising the personal relevance, value and meaning of STEM
  • A deeper appreciation of science
  • Increased interest in/pursuit of STEM subjects and careers post-16
  • Improved behaviour
  • Increased participation in out-of-school science activities

Ready to get started? Discover five ways to help young people develop science capital.

Additional reading and resources:

Beth Hawkins is the Science Museum Group (SMG) Academy Manager. She has been working in formal and informal science education for over 22 years, including roles as head of science in two London schools. Since joining the Science Museum, she has developed and delivered training to teachers and STEM professionals nationally and internationally, and led many of the SMG’s learning research to practice projects. The Science Museum Group Academy offers inspirational research-informed science engagement training and resources for teachers, museum and STEM professionals, and others involved in STEM communication and learning.

Tags:  access  aspirations  free resources  research  science  STEM 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

What makes a challenging GCSE science exam question?

Posted By Edmund Walsh, 05 February 2019
Updated: 22 December 2020

In this excerpt from the NACE Essentials guide “Realising the potential of more able learners in GCSE science”, NACE Associate Ed Walsh explores the components of a challenging GCSE science exam question – and how teachers can best help learners prepare. 

There is sometimes an assumption that it is the complexity of the content that is the key determinant in how challenging an exam question is; this isn’t necessarily the case. In fact, there are a variety of ways in which questions can be made more challenging, and in order to support learners with high target grades this needs to be understood.

When preparing your learners for the most challenging GCSE science exam questions, here are six aspects to consider:

1. Reduced scaffolding and multiple steps

Whereas some questions continue to be structured and are specific about what understanding or application should be demonstrated, there will be other questions where learners need to work out the sequence of stages to be undertaken. This might, for example, involve using one equation to calculate a value which is then substituted into another. As well as being able to (in some cases) recall the equations and use them, learners also need to work out the overall strategy.

Encourage learners to get into this habit by asking: “What’s a good way of approaching this question?”

2. Extended response questions

Extended responses are frequently marked using a level of response mark scheme. If there are six marks allocated, the mark scheme will commonly have three levels. If more able learners are to score five or six marks, they need to be meeting the level 3 descriptor as often as possible.

Help learners prepare by modelling extended responses and providing opportunities to practise this – considering a structure, selecting key words, using connectives and checking against the exam specifications.

3. Use of higher-order maths skills

Learners need to be able to apply maths skills in a variety of ways. This could be a multistep response in which learners, for example, plot points on a graph, sketch the (curved) line of best fit, draw the tangent and calculate its gradient. This requires both the necessary command of these skills, and the understanding of which to use.

To ensure learners have access to the necessary maths skills, develop dialogue with your maths department. Invite colleagues to jointly consider the maths skills involved in sample science questions, and how best to prepare learners for these challenges. As well as nurturing specific skills, focus on developing learners’ ability to identify effective strategies and sequencing.

4. Linking ideas from different areas

As part of the changes to GCSE science specifications, learners are expected to show they can work and think flexibly, linking ideas from different areas of the subject. Help them prepare by providing regular opportunities to practise this. Check out the specification and the guidance it gives about key ideas and linkage.

5. Applying ideas to novel contexts

Telling learners “If it’s not on the spec you don’t need to learn it” is dangerous – and untrue! Challenging them to apply their understanding to other contexts is part of the function of the exams and will continue to be so. Again, help them prepare through regular practise so they become accustomed to applying concepts to new contexts.

6. Varied command words

Each awarding organisation uses a particular set of command words in GCSE science exams. Some of these will already be in common parlance in your science lessons, others less so. Familiarising learners with the full range of these terms will prepare them to answer a wider range of questions. 

For example, a trawl through a selection of stretch and challenge questions from one suite of exam papers indicated the following usage: explain (x7), suggest (x6), compare, calculate (x12), give (x6), estimate, justify (x2), describe (x5), write (x2), use (x9), work out, draw, predict, complete (x3), show (x2), state.

Note that while these numbers show the frequency of each stem in one random selection, they don’t reflect the numbers of marks associated. It is useful, however, to reflect on the extent to which these form part of the discourse in science lessons – not just featuring in practice exam questions, but in all written and oral activities.

Tags:  assessment  GCSE  KS3  KS4  maths  science 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Top 10 ways NACE Challenge supports character education

Posted By Elaine Ricks-Neal, 04 February 2019
Updated: 22 December 2020

“Character” may be the latest buzzword in education – but it’s long been at the core of the NACE Challenge Framework, as NACE Challenge Award Adviser Elaine Ricks-Neal explains…

Increasingly schools are focusing on the development of “character” and learning dispositions as performance outcomes. Ofsted is also making it clear that it will look more at how well schools are developing resilient, well-rounded, confident young learners who will flourish in society.

The best schools, irrespective of setting, have always known the importance of this. And this focus on character has long been at the heart of the NACE Challenge Framework – a tool for school self-review and improvement which focuses on provision for more able learners, as part of a wider programme of sustainable school improvement and challenge for all.

Here are 10 key ways in which the Framework supports the development of school-wide approaches, mindsets and skills for effective character education:

1. “Can-do” culture

The NACE Challenge Framework embeds a school-wide “You can do it” culture of high expectations for all learners, engendering confidence and self-belief – prerequisites for learning.

2. Raising aspirations

The Framework challenges schools to raise aspirations for what all learners could achieve in life, irrespective of background. This is especially significant in schools where learners may not be exposed to high levels of ambition among parents/carers.

3. Curriculum of opportunity

Alongside a rich curriculum offer, the Framework asks schools to consider their enrichment and extracurricular programmes – ensuring that all learners have opportunities to develop a wide range of abilities, talents and skills, to develop cultural capital, and to access the best that has been thought and said.

4. Challenge for all

At the heart of the Framework is the goal of teachers understanding the learning needs of all pupils, including the most able; planning demanding, motivating work; and ensuring that all learners have planned opportunities to take risks and experience the challenge of going beyond their capabilities.

5. Aspirational targets

To ensure all learners are stretched and challenged, the Framework promotes the setting of highly aspirational targets for the most able, based on their starting points.

6. Developing young leaders

As part of its focus on nurturing student voice and independent learning skills, the Framework seeks to ensure that more able learners have opportunities to take on leadership roles and to make a positive contribution to the school and community.

7. Ownership of learning

The Framework encourages able learners to articulate their views on their learning experience in a mature and responsible way, and to manage and take ownership of their learning development.

8. Removing barriers

The Framework has a significant focus on underachievement and on targeting vulnerable groups of learners, setting out criteria for the identification of those who may have the potential to shine but have barriers in the way which need to be recognised and addressed individually.

9. Mentoring and support

Founded on the belief that more able and exceptionally able learners are as much in need of targeted support as any other group, the Framework demands that schools recognise and respond to their social and emotional and learning needs in a planned programme of mentoring and support.

10. Developing intrinsic motivation

Beyond recognising individual talents, the Framework promotes the celebration of success and hard work, ensuring that learners feel valued and supported to develop intrinsic motivation and the desire to be “the best they can.”

Find out more… To find out more about the NACE Challenge Development Programme and how it could support your school, click here or get in touch.

Tags:  aspirations  character  disadvantage  enrichment  mentoring  mindset  motivation  resilience  school improvement  student voice  underachievement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

6 steps to help more able learners excel in GCSE science

Posted By Edmund Walsh, 22 January 2019
Updated: 22 December 2020

In this excerpt from the NACE Essentials guide “Realising the potential of more able learners in GCSE science”, NACE Associate Ed Walsh outlines six key steps to improve provision and outcomes for those capable of attaining the highest grades in this subject. 

1. Make effective use of assessment data

While many schools devote a significant amount of time to assembling, applying, marking and grading periodic tests, there’s often scope for these to be used more effectively to diagnose areas for improvement. Question-level analysis can help both teachers and learners identify areas of low subject knowledge and skills gaps (tagged against GCSE assessment objectives) – informing feedback, self-assessment and goal-setting, interventions, evaluation of teaching styles and planning for future lessons.

Similarly, analysis can indicate how learners perform in multiple choice questions, shorter written responses and longer responses. Be prepared: if aspirational students are looking to develop in one of these areas, they’ll expect guidance as to how to do so. Woe betide the teacher who can’t provide a learner chasing a good grade either with more examples or effective strategies in areas identified as weaknesses!

2. Challenge learners to use a range of command words

Each awarding organisation uses a particular set of command words in GCSE science exams. Some of these will already be in common parlance in your science lessons, while others may not be used as often. Familiarising learners with the full range of these terms will prepare them to answer a wider range of questions. 

When revising a topic, prompt learners to suggest the type of questions examiners might ask; this will help them revise more effectively. Elicit the nature of each question, encouraging learners to consider the influence of assessment objectives (AOs) and to use a full range of command words.

3. Develop dialogue with the maths department

The quality of dialogue with colleagues in maths and the development of a whole-school numeracy policy has never been so important. (It may also never have been so tricky, bearing in mind the pressure that both maths and science teams can be under.) It can be tempting for a hard-pressed science department to want the maths team to fit in with their running order of topics. The maths curriculum is also driven by a sense of progression, but not necessarily the same one. Skills demanded in KS3 science may in some cases not be taught in maths until KS4.

Rather than reach an impasse, focus on exploring common ground. Set up a joint meeting and look at maths skills involved in sample science questions. Invite colleagues to explore potential strategies, terminology, likely challenges for learners and how they would deal with these. As well as nurturing specific skills, focus on developing learners’ ability to identify effective strategies and sequencing. More able learners aiming for high grades need to develop problem-solving skills as well as a mastery of individual skills.

4. Review the role of practical work and skills

When carrying out required practicals, ensure learners have access to a range of question types, including questions based on AO2 (application of knowledge and understanding) and AO3 (interpretation and evaluation). It is also important to look at the lists of apparatus and techniques skills in the GCSE specification. Questions relating to practical work are often based on these, even if the context isn’t one learners have met in the required practicals. Assess how good learners are at these skills and whether you can give them more opportunities to develop these. These have a strong relationship with skills used at A-level, meaning those progressing to further study will also benefit.

5. Develop the role of extended writing

Candidates will be expected to develop extended responses, especially on higher tier papers. Look at learners’ performance on such questions to see how it compares with other items. It may be useful to encourage learners to consider what structure to use before commencing writing. Model the drafting of an extended response, demonstrating how you select key words, use connectives, structure a response and check against the answer. AQA, for example, is moving towards the use of generic descriptors for types of extended responses.

6. Link ideas from different parts of the specification

As part of the changes to GCSE science specifications, learners are expected to show that they can work and think flexibly, linking ideas from different areas. Use questions that require this, identifying good examples to use in advance. One of the sample questions uses the context of a current balance, including ideas about magnetic fields and levers. Check out the specification and the guidance it gives about key ideas and linkage. As well as scrutinising the detailed content, look at the preamble and follow-up.

Tags:  assessment  feedback  GCSE  KS3  KS4  maths  science 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Selling 3D shapes: challenge through enterprise

Posted By Gail Roberts, 15 January 2019
Updated: 23 December 2020

Gail Roberts, More Able and Talented Coordinator at Llanfoist Fawr Primary School, shares a simple but effective activity to engage and challenge all learners – combining mathematics, oracy, collaborative working and more…

Facilitating learning, rather than directional teaching, not only ensures children take ownership, it also opens the floodgates to more able learners. Obviously it is vital to choose an effective challenging task and teach the skills they need beforehand, in order for learners to access the experience fully and develop it further through ongoing evaluation.
 
In the past at school, children may have brought cakes in from home to sell as an enterprise activity. Although this is usually an enjoyable experience, it isn’t a true representation of the profit and loss of running a business, and fails to optimise on additional opportunities for learning.
 
In this alternative activity, I ask learners to work in teams to make 3D shapes and then come up with a plan to sell them. This gives them a tangible experience, a determination for gaining information about shapes, and a chance to make choices which they can then witness the effects of at first-hand.

Develop key skills and understanding

From two weeks before the planned “sale day”, I encourage learners to consider the skills they will need and provide opportunities for them to develop these. Identified skills include:

  • Persuasive language – learners are challenged to think of sentences that will entice people to stop at their stall, come up with a catchy jingle or slogan, etc.
  • Negotiation – bartering on prices for the shapes.
  • Understand profit and loss and interest.
  • How to keep a record of the accounts, on paper or electronically.
  • Elect leaders of the group and allocate team members.
  • Sell using at least two languages.
  • Working effectively as a team toward a shared aim.

Teaching the children how to formulate the boxes on a spreadsheet is easy, if you have previously taught coordinates. When spoken about in simple terms, profit and loss can be seen by every child. Allowing more able learners to formulate the spreadsheet gives them the opportunity to make it as complex as they want, while the opportunity to develop a business plan allows more able business minds to shine.
 
Giving learners time to think and plan for the sale day ensures that ideas can be evaluated and developed, and allows the group to come together as a team.

Replicate real-life challenges

The activity can also be used to help learners develop their understanding of real-life business processes and challenges, including:

  • Premises to rent – every 15 minutes learners must pay rent for their stall; if late, they incur a fine.
  • Property maintenance – fines incurred for untidy stalls.  
  • Marketing – stalls decorated to attract customers.
  • Interest rates – opportunity to start business with a loan, which must be paid back with interest.

Allow learners to shape the activity

The learning can be further enriched by inviting learners to suggest rules for the running of the activity. For example:

  • When buying, be willing to pay more if learners can answer questions on the properties and names of the shapes, and if well-made or decorated.
  • If someone in the group is not working efficiently, allow the team leader to give a warning or sanction.

Over many years of facilitating this kind of learning, the outcome has never been the same twice. Learners think of things that I would never have come up with. For example, this year they discussed ideas to test individual skills and allocate jobs based on ability, rather than simply getting every team member to cut, decorate, stick and sell. They discussed ideas about firing those who weren’t working hard enough, buying other teams’ products and selling them on at a profit, buying another table to expand their company, and researching language patterns and properties of shapes in order to sell to a broader audience knowledgeably.

What learners say…

While the summary above is hopefully sufficient to allow you to run a similar activity in your school, the impact is best expressed in the words of learners themselves:
 
“I thought this was an excellent idea for learning. Without realising it, we were making many cross-curriculum links, especially between maths and oracy. We were using strategies for problem solving and working as a team. We were having fun but learning at the same time.”
 
“I think learning in this way makes it easier to learn, because we are learning important things, but at the same time having fun. I prefer learning this way. I like being in charge of my own learning, thinking outside of the box, rather than being told.”
 
“This was a fun, challenging and exciting learning environment. This made it easier to remember the skills we needed and to use them effectively.”
 
“At the start of the challenge I didn’t have a clue what a spreadsheet was, but I enjoyed the challenge and felt proud that I could format the whole sheet myself and code new boxes when I needed to.”
 
“Communicating in a different language was challenging. However, it helped me to appreciate other people’s struggles to speak English. Our group worked cooperatively, making the most of individual talents.”
 
“It didn’t feel like we were learning. However, reflecting back on what we did, I realise I learnt and used a vast range of new skills.”
 
“It took me a matter of minutes to learn the properties and names of a massive amount of different 3D shapes. This was because I had a real purpose to learn. I was so proud when a visitor asked me questions on the properties and I blew him away with my knowledge and how confidently I was able to answer his questions.” 
 
“It helped me to understand the importance of working as a team. We all had a job to do. These were selected, because we could do that particular thing really well. It made me feel like it was an actual place of work and we were actually doing a ‘job’. Real-life situations like these help me to realise the importance of everyone’s unique abilities.” 


Gail Roberts is the MAT Coordinator, Maths Coordinator and Year 5 teacher at Llanfoist Fawr Primary School in Monmouthshire. She has worked in education since 1980, starting out as an NNEB with children with severe difficulties in basic life skills, and gaining her NPQH in 2007. Llanfoist Fawr gained the NACE Challenge Award in 2017, in recognition of school-wide commitment to high-quality provision for MAT learners within a context of challenge for all.

Tags:  collaboration  entrepreneurship  independent learning  KS1  KS2  maths  student voice 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

5 steps to improve your use of NRICH

Posted By King Edwin Primary School, 15 January 2019
Updated: 06 August 2019
You may already be using the free maths resources provided by the University of Cambridge’s NRICH project – but are you getting maximum impact from them, for all your learners? In this blog post, Anthony Bandy, Assistant Head Teacher at King Edwin Primary School and a participant in the NACE/NRICH ambassador scheme, shares five ways to rethink and improve your approach…

Before joining the NACE/NRICH ambassador programme, I honestly thought I was using NRICH correctly… However, since accessing the programme, I have come to realise that I was not even close to using the resources to their full potential!

Like many others, I had previously used NRICH simply as an extension activity for the more able. However, NRICH is in fact based on a “Low threshold, high ceiling” approach – basically meaning that all learners can access the resources, and push themselves to what they want to achieve.

Following my participation in the NRICH ambassador training, and subsequent opportunities to share this training within my own school and more widely, here are five steps to get maximum value from NRICH for all learners in your maths lessons…

1. Look beyond “maths mastery”

When the new maths curriculum arrived, our school had some very negative data, with problem solving and reasoning causing the biggest issues. Our response was to focus on maths mastery.

However, during my first training session as an NRICH ambassador, it became apparent that mastery is only a method of delivering maths; it is not a government expectation, and it is also not necessarily sufficient to fully meet the needs of all young mathematicians.

You can read more about the NRICH perspective on mastery here.

2. Use NRICH throughout each unit of work, for all learners

As a school, we changed how we delivered mathematics. We’ve adopted a “Six Stages of Learning” approach, which involves teaching, fluency, problem solving, reasoning, hybrid and mentoring for every objective, and is also developmental for individual learners.*

Importantly, NRICH is not just used towards the end of units. In some classes, NRICH activities have been used to introduce topics. For example, the “Swimming Pool” activity was used in Year 5 to introduce the concept of negative numbers. This worked really well, with children having to think of various potential concepts.

In addition, we decided to further implement our stages of learning by including NRICH as our Stage 5 (hybrid stage). We agreed that when the curriculum mapping resource permits and there is an activity available (see below), teachers will implement the activity for all learners to access, giving all individuals the exposure to problem solving and reasoning activities.

3. Incorporate NRICH in planning

As the NACE/NRICH ambassador, I delivered a training session for all staff. We looked closely at the curriculum mapping resources on the NRICH website, outlining links between mathematics objectives and NRICH activities. This resource definitely helped teachers to plan for NRICH activities in their lessons, rather than simply “throwing in” an activity as an extension or filler.

During the training, we also focused on how to use the NRICH resources to their full potential, looking at how NRICH provides guidance on questioning, starting points and solutions.

4. Encourage learners (and teachers) to explore multiple solutions

Prior to the training, some staff had mentioned feeling unsure about the solutions. We’d also found that our more able learners sometimes struggled when asked to think of a different approach to a problem. In their minds, they already knew the right answer, so therefore didn’t need to find another way. We asked ourselves “Are these types of learners true ‘problem solvers’, if they only know one way to solve a problem?”

The NRICH solutions pages have proven useful for both teachers and learners, giving examples of what a good solution might look like – and reminding both groups that there may be more than one “right” answer. More likely than not, there will be a variety of different solutions. In order for learners to develop as confident problem solvers, it’s important that they can find and understand a variety of approaches.

5. Embrace the “low threshold, high ceiling” approach

Sharing the published solutions has exposed all learners to examples of excellent quality reasoning, which is then reflected in their own practice. A fantastic example of this, along with the “low threshold, high ceiling” approach, came during a Year 5 lesson exploring the topic: “What came first – the chicken or the egg?”

With this topic in mind, we looked at the “Eggs in baskets” activity, which is predominantly a KS1 problem. In the lesson, all learners were able to have a go at the activity, with most adopting a visual representation (e.g. circles as baskets), using trial and improvement to solve the problem. Once learners had been successful, I gave them printouts of the published solutions and asked them to try and work out how others had solved the activity.

I gave my most able learners copies of a solution completed by a secondary pupil, who had solved the problem using algebra. Without my guidance, I asked them to look at the algebraic solution and try to work out how it had been achieved. A short while later, they came to me and could explain the algebraic solution.

I then found a similar problem involving the Cookie Monster and cookies eaten per day. I asked my more able learners to try and solve it using algebra – simply from their experience with the previous activity. This emphasises the “low threshold, high ceiling” scope of NRICH – what began as a KS1 problem ended up as a KS3 problem, using algebraic equations!

The lesson was so successful that when delivering an NRICH session to 40+ schools at a Nottinghamshire Maths Network Meeting, I took a learner along to demonstrate their achievements and explain the processes behind them.

Impact and next steps…

Teachers in our school are now using NRICH more effectively and more of our learners are being exposed not only to crucial problem-solving skills, but also to important collaborative life skills.

Our 2017-18 results were our most successful since the new curriculum, and are on track to be beaten again. But even more importantly, when NRICH is mentioned in any class, learners respond with great enthusiasm, which demonstrates the productive disposition element of the five essential aspects to developing young mathematicians (read more on the NRICH website).

Our next steps as a school will be to deliver training on “working mathematically” and collaborative learning – a vital skill for all our learners to develop for their future studies and careers.

* For more information on the “Six Stages of Learning” or other approaches mentioned in this blog post, please contact the school via NACE.

Tags:  CPD  free resources  maths 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 13 of 18
 |<   <<   <  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18