Guidance, ideas and examples to support schools in developing their curriculum, pedagogy, enrichment and support for more able learners, within a whole-school context of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes ideas to support curriculum development, and practical examples, resources and ideas to try in the classroom. Popular topics include: curriculum development, enrichment, independent learning, questioning, oracy, resilience, aspirations, assessment, feedback, metacognition, and critical thinking.
Top tags:
pedagogy
questioning
enrichment
research
oracy
independent learning
curriculum
free resources
KS3
aspirations
cognitive challenge
KS4
assessment
language
literacy
feedback
resilience
critical thinking
maths
metacognition
collaboration
confidence
English
creativity
wellbeing
lockdown
vocabulary
access
mindset
CPD
 
|
Posted By Christine Chen and Lindsay Pickton ,
18 January 2018
Updated: 22 December 2020
|
NACE associates Christine Chen and Lindsay Pickton are experienced primary English advisors, with a specialisation in supporting more able learners. In this blog post, they explain how grammar games can help to foster creativity, engagement with the composition process, and a lasting love of language.
If you’re not already using grammar games in your classroom, here are five reasons to start now…
1. They set a high bar for all learners
The great thing about grammar games is that they enable a “low threshold, high ceiling” approach to learning, enabling all learners to experience the possibilities of language manipulation. While some games offer potential forms of differentiation, the key – as with any learning – is having high expectations of all.
2. They’re fun!
There’s a common misconception that grammar is intrinsically boring and dry. Grammar games help to break this down, providing opportunities for teachers and learners alike to have fun with grammar, through activities including dice games, physical manipulation of sentence structures and simple drama strategies.
3. They put grammar in context
Grammar teaching and learning is commonly approached through isolated exercises, which may help some children with test preparation, but do little to support composition. Grammar games can be used to explore grammar in the wider context of language usage, making it more likely that learners will apply new learning and continue to experiment.
4. They encourage risk-taking
Collaborative grammar play transforms what could be a purely internal process into an enjoyable shared learning experience. When children experiment with application in writing following these collaborative games, they are more likely to take risks and to feel in control, in a joyful way.
5. They nurture a love of language
Playing with language fosters a love of it. This is important for all learners, including more able writers and communicators. Even if they don’t know the terminology, these learners are able to adapt sentence structures and vocabulary choices to achieve a desired impact on their readership. Grammar games further encourage them to take pleasure in exploring and developing their skills as young writers.
One to try: “Every word counts”
This is a dice game for manipulating meaning and exploring nuance through vocabulary choices. It’s one of the most popular and adaptable games we’ve invented; as children play, they experience tangibly the descriptive power of every word in a sentence.
Create a six-word sentence, in which no word class is repeated, and list the word classes in order.
e.g. They played in their tiny garden.
- Pronoun
- Verb
- Preposition
- Determiner
- Adjective
- Noun
Throw a dice. With each throw, children must change the corresponding word in the sentence, and discuss (as a group or whole class) what has changed about the scene or story.
e.g. Throw a 4 – change the determiner:
- They played in their tiny garden.
- They played in her tiny garden.
- They played in the tiny garden.
- They played in this tiny garden.
Learners discuss how changes made affect the meaning. With each change, how does the word choice affect the story?
Tags:
creativity
English
language
oracy
vocabulary
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By NACE,
17 January 2018
Updated: 12 July 2019
|
At last term’s NACE member meetup at the National Maritime Museum, attendees had the opportunity to exchange approaches and resources to support working in depth for more able learners. From the plethora of fantastic ideas exchanged on the day, here are seven to try in your school…
1. Going SOLO
NACE associate Heather Clements opened the discussion with an overview of SOLO Taxonomy, and several attendees also shared examples of how their schools are using SOLO. Ideas included showing the SOLO verbs on class walls with colour-coding by taxonomy stage, to develop learners’ language and motivate them to move up a level, and incorporating the taxonomy in marking webs at the start and end of units.
2. TED breakfast club
Shared by Rachel Bellfield at Capital City Academy, this breakfast club provides a filling and stimulating start to the day – with mental fodder provided in the form of subject-related TED talk recordings. Participating learners make notes in a journal, keeping a record of links to their lesson-time learning.
3. Oxplore.org
Recommended by a number of NACE members, this website run by the University of Oxford aims to engage 11-18 year olds in complex ideas and debates that go beyond their school curriculum. Users can take on the site’s “Big Questions”, watch videos, test their knowledge, join live online events, and pose their own questions.
4. Really short stories
To challenge learners to focus on the quality of their vocabulary and precision of language use, Fran Pett at John Ruskin Primary school suggested giving tight parameters for written tasks – such as a 16-word limit for short stories, or a maximum number of sentences per paragraph.
5. Headteachers’ challenge
At Oakleigh House school, learners are challenged each week to take on the headteachers’ challenge, posted up on the Aim High board. Responses are shared in an assembly, with outstanding work showcased on the board.
6. Questioning for parents
To help parents and carers develop their use of questioning, Salcombe Preparatory School runs workshops on this topic, featuring practical demonstrations by staff and students. These events are supported by a booklet on questioning for parents and carers, and aligned with other events for maximum reach.
7. Model United Nations
Finally, Nathan Wooding at Edge Grove Preparatory School recommended participation in the Model United Nations as an inspiring and engaging way for learners to develop a whole range of skills, including independent learning, project work, research, critical thinking and negotiation.
How does your school support working in depth? Add a comment below to share your ideas.
Tags:
aspirations
depth
enrichment
free resources
independent learning
questioning
SOLO Taxonomy
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Christabel Shepherd,
16 January 2018
Updated: 09 September 2020
|
Christabel Shepherd, headteacher of Bradford’s Copthorne Primary School, will join the upcoming English for the More Able conference to share the strategies behind the school’s success in creating a rich language environment. In this blog, she previews her conference talk with five top tips to develop language skillsacross all areas of the curriculum.
Copthorne Primary is an outstanding inner city, two-form entry primary school, one of the lead schools in the Exceed Teaching Schools Alliance and lead school for the Exceed SCITT. In 2016, it gained NACE Challenge Award accreditation in recognition of its high-quality provision for more able learners.
Pupils who attend Copthorne come from an area of significant social and economic deprivation. The school’s deprivation indicator is currently in the highest band nationally, and the ward deprivation figure states that 42.8% of families are living in neighbourhoods which are amongst the top 10 most deprived in England.
Almost all (99.7%) of our pupils are from minority ethnic groups, mainly Mirpuri Pakistani, with a small but increasing number from Eastern Europe, Syria and Somalia. A large majority (99.2%) do not speak English at home, and in some cases are approaching English as a brand new language.
This combination of factors results in language and experiential deficits amongst the majority of our children when they start school – making it vital that we focus on the development of language throughout our provision. Having made this a key priority, Copthorne has succeeded in embedding strategies for language development across the whole school and curriculum.
Here are five of the key strands to our approach…
1. Invest in high-quality training for all teachers and support staff
At Copthorne, we’ve focused on training in the following areas:
- Meeting the needs of more able learners
- Providing challenge across the curriculum
- High-quality questioning and assessment for learning
- How to support and challenge the development of all learners’ vocabulary, fluency and clarity of language
- Strategies to develop high-quality talk
- The importance of modelling standard English
- Growth mindset
Impact: Whole-school ownership of the strategies and understanding of their importance, and effective modelling of high-quality language, leading to high-quality provision and improved outcomes for all learners with a particular focus on the more able. 2017 KS2 SATs percentage of learners working at greater depth: Reading 55%, SPAG: 84%, Writing (TA): 40%.
2. Introduce a weekly vocabulary lesson
Across the school, we’ve developed and implemented a weekly vocabulary lesson with a focus on high-quality description, idiomatic and metaphorical language.
Impact: Improved spoken and written language. All learners have independent access to good-quality word banks which they have developed. The quality of descriptive writing and narrative is improving.
3. Focus on high-quality teaching of reading
At Copthorne, we achieve this through:
- Reading skills taught via the whole curriculum
- Guided reading delivered weekly by teachers to all learners, grouped according to ability
- Additional weekly “Racing Readers” guided session after school, for more able learners focusing on higher-order thinking skills, inference, deduction and authorial intent, as well as providing the opportunity to teach SPAG in context
- Headteacher’s Book Clubs: extended guided reading groups for more able readers in Years 5 and 6. A challenging text is issued to learners and an initial focus given, with 2-4 weeks independent reading time. The group meets after the agreed time to share afternoon tea, discuss the agreed focus and introduce the next focus.
- Support for parents: workshops, resources
Impact: Improvements in parental engagement with reading at home; improvements in learners’ ability to infer, deduce and verbalise this; further development of school culture of reading – pupils value books and reading. See also Reading SATs greater depth results, above.
4. Create a language-rich environment
We do this through:
- Talking school strategies: opportunities and groupings for talk in every subject, talk partners, debating, school council, drama, film-making
- Interactive displays: all displays include a range of questions as well as a distinct “challenge” question. All learners are expected to respond to these questions and more able learners are directed specifically to the challenge question.
- Word of the week displays in each classroom: learners use the word in context; more able learners are encouraged to find synonyms, antonyms etc.
- Banned words – such as spooky, scary, said, like (when used as a space filler rather than a verb or simile!), sad, nice. We also ban colloquial/slang words or phrases which are commonly used by our learners, e.g. “I be’s sad”; “I did sick”; “ain’t”, “anyways”; “irregardless”. Banned or restricted usage goes alongside good teaching which explains the effects of overusing a word, and how to use it effectively.
- WWW Walls: “We were wondering…” Learners are encouraged to pose their own questions and these are discussed weekly.
- £1 book sales, weekly in the playgrounds
Impact: Learners are more confident and articulate speakers; vocabulary choices have improved; independent learning has further developed; learners demonstrate good reasoning skills, verbally and written, and can effectively debate; writing composition is improving year on year – an increased number of more able learners are consistently producing writing that is at a greater depth; learners are demonstrating higher aspirations.
5. Provide rich writing experiences
At Copthorne, this is achieved through:
- Spelling in context – learners are given three to five spelling words to use in a five-minute story writing challenge
- Silent discussions – learners discuss a topic through written communication only
- Modelled, shared and guided writing
- Aspiration portfolios/WAGOLLs: great-quality writing outcomes by learners are saved and shared
We also use year group writing events, such as:
- Alien landing: We gathered bits of scrap metal, plastic, old car bulbs etc, and sprinkled this over an area in the playground, with some homemade slime – and we hid a huge alien egg. Our local community police officer cordoned off the area with police tape and stood on duty as the children arrived at the start of the school day. The officer also kindly agreed to be interviewed by pupils. Class teachers were free to use the stimulus for any genre of writing they wished, but the scenario leant itself particularly well to recounts, newspaper reports, diaries, mystery and science fiction stories.
- Who stole the World Cup? Having purchased a very good replica of the FIFA World Cup, we held a whole-school assembly to explain that we had been leant one of the valuable “replicas” by FIFA. The friend of a teacher dressed as a security guard and displayed the cup in a velvet-lined carrying case. The cup was then placed in our trophy cabinet and each class was brought to view it during the week. After a week or so, the children arrived at school one morning to see several policemen in our main reception. The area had been partly cordoned off, there was broken glass everywhere, a taped-up window, some tools, a hat, a glove, a few footprints and – of course – no World Cup. Again, this led to various writing outcomes, while also linking to maths and science through the use of clues. A few weeks later, our Year 4 Forest School children discovered the cup in a wooded area – prompting further speculation, discussion and writing.
- Giant attack: Year 1 entered school one morning to find their classrooms in complete disarray – tables and chairs turned over, drawers emptied and giant footprints everywhere. This scenario built on the work the children had been doing around Jack and the Beanstalk. They worked together initially to decide what had happened using the clues provided. The children then wrote newspaper reports about the event, as well as letters which tried to calm the angry giant.
Impact: There are more opportunities for learners to write for a purpose; more able learners’ spelling has markedly improved – particularly noticeable in their “free writing”; more able learners are more competent in sustaining a narrative in terms of fluency and genre-appropriate writing; there has been a distinct improvement in the levels of engagement with writing demonstrated by boys.
With over 30 years’ experience of teaching in both primary and secondary settings, Christabel Shepherd has been headteacher of Bradford’s Copthorne Primary School since 2012. Amongst other roles, she is currently a local leader of education, leader of the Exceed SCITT English programme, a facilitator for the NPQSL, pupil premium reviewer, and leader of school-to-school support for a category 4 school. She is a firm believer in the power of growth mindset and the importance of challenge for all learners.
Tags:
aspirations
disadvantage
KS1
KS2
language
literacy
reading
writing
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Sarah Carpenter,
16 January 2018
Updated: 03 November 2020
|
Getting to grips with mastery doesn’t have to be hard work – far from it. In this blog post (originally published on schoolsimprovement.net), NACE associate Sarah Carpenter outlines a simple but effective use of mastery to improve primary English provision for all learners, including the more able…
While teachers and schools are at different points in the maths mastery journey, it’s now fairly clear what that looks like and what’s expected. When it comes to English, however, there’s relatively little guidance on how to use mastery effectively.
Inspired by Michael Tidd’s advocacy of longer literacy units, covering fewer texts and focusing on writing for a social purpose, over the past three years I’ve worked with schools to develop a mastery approach for primary English. This is certainly not the only approach to mastery in English, but it is an approach that I and the schools involved have found effective.
The concept is simple: each half term the teacher selects a central “driver text”. This is paired with a range of supplementary texts, including fiction, poetry, non-fiction, multimodal texts, and cross-curricular links. The unit is planned around the driver text, building in curriculum requirements and a broad range of writing opportunities.
This approach gives all learners the opportunity to develop a secure understanding of the driver text, subject matter and key skills – as well as the scope to work in greater depth and to explore and showcase their creativity and writing abilities.
Here are six reasons to try this mastery approach in your primary English provision:
1. It works for learners of all abilities
First and foremost, mastery is about providing support and opportunities for learners of all abilities to develop at their own pace. This approach allows time for all learners to become familiar with the central text and subject matter, and to practise specific skills such as predicting, comparing, making connections and synthesising.
For learners working below age-related expectations, you’re not moving on too quickly, and there are opportunities to consolidate skills through repetition. At the other end of the spectrum, more able learners have opportunities to broaden their knowledge and understanding of the writing purpose, bring together multiple texts, and deepen their subject knowledge.
The inclusion of poetry in each unit helps to expand learners’ vocabulary and get them thinking creatively about the choices they’re making. The use of non-fiction and cross-curricular texts provides opportunities for the more able to make clever use of sources, and to play with their writing styles, taking the audience and purpose into account. They have a bigger toolbox to draw on, allowing them to really show off their finesse as writers.
2. It engages even reluctant writers
When choosing a driver text, I try to choose one that will capture the interest of everyone in the class, particularly keeping boys in mind. Then I plan the unit to incorporate a wide variety of writing opportunities – short, medium and long – so even reluctant writers face something manageable and interesting, that breaks the mould in terms of what they’re usually asked to write.
3. It develops deep subject knowledge
Bringing in supporting texts with a shared theme allows learners to develop a deep sense of subject knowledge, so they can write as experts in the field. Just as a published author wouldn’t start writing without doing their background research first, we’re setting the same expectation for our pupils. This approach resonates very much with highly able learners in English.
4. It makes more effective use of time
This approach takes up no more or less time than would already be used for literacy sessions, but makes more effective use of that time. Covering fewer texts in a more focused way means more time to get deeply into the full range of curriculum requirements – in terms of reading, writing, drama and spoken language. You can even use the driver text or an accompanying text for guided reading sessions, so everything is working together.
In terms of planning, you do need to allocate more time at the beginning, because you’re essentially planning out the full half term in skeletal form. You can adapt as you go along, but you need to plan ahead to ensure you extract everything you can from the driver text and stop at the right points, building up that sense of mystery and anticipation, and allowing for reading and writing opportunities along the way.
Once you’ve chosen the driver text, you’re looking for those opportunities to bring in non-fiction, and searching for appropriate poetry connections. Once you’ve done this groundwork, you should find you spend less time on weekly planning, because you’ve got the framework in place.
5. It works for all types of text…
…even (or especially) picture books! I often choose picture-based story books or graphic novels, such as David Wiesner’s Flotsam or Shaun Tan’s The Arrival – which can be interesting when you tell people the unit is going to improve children’s vocabulary and grammar! Other driver texts I’ve used include Robert Swindells’ The Ice Palace, Rob Biddulph’s Blown Away, Helen Cooper’s Pumpkin Soup and Alexis Deacon’s I am Henry Finch.
Essentially, you’re looking for a text where you see lots of potential to go off at all sorts of different angles, and bring in cross-curricular links. For example, with I am Henry Finch, there are lots of links to be made with PSHE.
6. It’s fun!
Last but certainly not least, this mastery approach is fun. I’ve developed units for KS1, lower KS2 and upper KS2, with positive feedback from all. Not only have schools got some fantastic writing and reading responses from learners, but the children have really enjoyed it. They appreciate the opportunity to get deeply into one particular text – but not to the extent where they get bored, because they’ve got the addition of other texts of different types, and the scope to show off just what they can do.
Tags:
creativity
English
KS1
KS2
literacy
mastery
reading
writing
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Ben Weddell, National Maritime Museum,
03 January 2018
Updated: 08 April 2019
|
The National Maritime Museum recently hosted a NACE member meetup exploring approaches to working in depth for the more able. Following on from the event, the museum’s Ben Weddell explains how an enquiry-based approach to history can be used to inspire and challenge learners of all ages and abilities.
Recently the National Maritime Museum (NMM) learning team were lucky enough to host a NACE member meetup. Following a presentation on SOLO Taxonomy and a “speed sharing” session, we had the opportunity to share the museum’s approach to teaching historical enquiry and how this can translate to the classroom, based on my experiences at the NMM and as a secondary history teacher.
History as an investigative process
A fascinating aspect of learning about the past is the realisation that we have to discover it. Far from a list of dates and occurrences to be memorised and regurgitated, history can – should – be an investigative subject of discovery.
This is a far more interesting and engaging approach, and one which provides opportunities to personalise and differentiate, by giving learners agency for the routes they take in uncovering the past.
Indeed, for history to have any meaning as a subject I would argue that it has to be investigative. It is through the skills which constitute a historical methodology that “history” comes to make sense as a coherent single subject.
Defining a historical method
If challenged about the scientific method, most teachers would be able to outline the “hypothesis, experimentation, new hypothesis” model. Is it possible to repeat that for history? If there is a scientific method that learners can grasp, surely there has to be an equivalent for history.
Historical enquiry is the skill that fills this gap. This starts from the premise that we don’t know what happened in the past and have to discover this for ourselves – a great learning opportunity as this is where learners themselves begin. Rather than treating learners as passive vessels to be topped up with historical information, this approach challenges them to uncover the past themselves.
Furthermore, there is an expectation in the national curriculum that enquiry will be taught:
“Pupils are expected to understand the methods of historical enquiry, including how evidence is used rigorously to make historical claims, and discern how and why contrasting arguments and interpretations of the past have been constructed.”
This process builds from KS1 to KS2 and 3, developing skills in dealing with isolated blocks of evidence and then establishing links between these, culminating in the ability to assess, ask questions of, and reflect on a large bank of potentially contradictory evidence and come to sound conclusions.
Harnessing the power of objects
One way to engage learners in this journey is to incorporate object-based enquiry. History teaching often focuses around the spoken and written word, resulting in a teacher-led approach. Using objects, especially in a multisensory capacity, can add interesting new dimensions to learning:
Increased motivation and curiosity
- Accessibility, through the ability for learners to raise their own questions
- Multisensory approaches providing different access points for a range of learners
- “Realness” – aiding understanding of abstract ideas through a focus on tangible objects
- Cross-curricular opportunities for literacy, incorporation of other forms of evidence and other subject areas
It is possible to build enquiry opportunities using a huge range of objects, so developing a specific object bank is useful but not essential. Whether making use of printed resources or actual physical objects, the process of conducting an enquiry is what brings the object to life.
Let learners find their own challenge
Larger enquiries offer extensive opportunities for teachers. The key is to provide a limited amount of initial evidence and then allow learners to formulate their own responses. This creates effective differentiation and provides unique opportunities for learners to create their own working level, including the more able.
Furthermore, a creative introduction to the initial information – say roleplaying an archaeological discovery or a new finding in a document or database – provides motivation for learners to set themselves a challenging question.
It is then possible to expand investigations with the introduction of new evidence. There is flexibility in the range and scope of evidence you introduce, which will be determined by learners’ needs and level. For instance, a limited suitcase of objects could be investigated by KS1 learners, whereas by KS3 a teacher could overload learners with objects, so they have to differentiate between useful evidence and red herrings or irrelevant information.
In practice this could take the form of:
- One-off mysteries (KS1/KS2): a collection of objects to consider and a simple guided outcome, for instance “Whose suitcase might this be?”
- Developed enquiries (KS2/KS3): building on initial discoveries to develop an entire scheme of work, for instance “Why was this object found in the Arctic?”, leading into a wider investigation of John Franklin’s doomed final voyage to the Arctic, linking more widely to Arctic exploration.
- Self-led enquiries (KS3): initial collection of evidence and a problem, leading to a project including opportunities for learners to define their own questions and route, selecting appropriate evidence from a wide range and engaging with controversies.
All of these models follow the same process – starting with initial evidence, developing a hypothesis, testing with additional evidence, then repeating with a new hypothesis and so on. The cyclical nature of this process is marked by increasing degrees of certainty in learners’ findings as they increase the depth and range of the evidence they have based their ideas upon.
Enquiry as part of a wider pedagogy
Making enquiry a central part of learning has a number of benefits. It revolves around approaching topics with a focus on teaching skills that can then be used to access content, as opposed to a discrete delivery of content and skills. In turn, this means that history begins to make coherent sense, challenging some learners’ misconception that it is “just stuff that has happened”.
The skills acquired will also be more easily transferable and encourage a cross-curricular approach. Significantly, these skills are highly applicable to a wider world in which the ability to assess and sift incoming information is becoming ever more crucial.
Historical enquiry fits well with other pedagogies, such as SOLO Taxonomy or other progressive models such as Bloom’s. As the enquiry progresses, individual learners move through different stages of thinking skills, with initial stages of identification and definition, progressing to description of evidence, classification and analysis, through to evaluation and hypothesising around a wide range of evidence.
This approach forms the basis for historical enquiry sessions at the National Maritime Museum. These sessions include KS1 investigations into where breakfast comes from, full-day secondary study sessions incorporating original archive materials, and expert research sessions for post-16 students. You can find out more about these sessions on our website or through our guide to school programmes, which can be found here.
Useful links:
- National Maritime Museum for schools – including information about school visits, CPD opportunities, downloadable resources and more.
- Royal Museums Greenwich collections – searchable database of the Royal Musuems Greenwich collections, ranging from maps and charts to a taxidermy penguin! Includes images and information which can easily be adapted as resources for teaching and learning.
- Spartacus Educational – free-to-use site hosting historical resources and materials, useful for creating banks of evidence to build an enquiry.
- Thinking History – website of Ian Dawson, one of the founders of the Schools History Project, with a huge array of fantastic enquiry-based sessions available for free.
Ben is a learning producer at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, where he specialises in historical enquiry programmes for learners of all ages. He previously worked as a history teacher in secondary schools and a sixth form college, with a particular interest in opportunities to build historical enquiry into the curriculum. To find out more about Ben’s work and how your school could get involved, contact NACE and we will put you in touch.
Tags:
enquiry
free resources
history
pedagogy
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Anne Fine OBE,
15 December 2017
Updated: 09 April 2019
|
The UK’s recent rise in the PIRLS tables has been accompanied both by praise for schools’ success in boosting reading levels, and by calls to remember that the pleasure of reading is just as important as the mechanics.
The coalition behind the ROGO Index, launched today, has highlighted research linking enjoyment of reading to better educational outcomes and improved life chances, while the index itself suggests young people’s enjoyment and frequency of reading are lagging behind their cognitive reading skills.
In this context, second Children’s Laureate Anne Fine OBE – a longstanding advocate of the wide-ranging benefits of reading – shares advice to help schools encourage learners of all abilities to read more, and to get more from their reading…
Even in today’s digital, multimedia age, good books remain essential in helping young people develop – not only their literacy, but their ability to understand themselves, those around them and the wider world.
This is true for learners of all abilities, including the more able. The challenge for teachers is in helping them access the right books – books that will speak to their interests, engage their curiosity, open up new ideas and possibilities.
So even as schools come under growing pressure to invest in computer labs and tablets, they should renew efforts to stock up their bookshelves, and equip teachers to support all learners in becoming wide and avid readers.
Raise the bar
In my visits to schools around the country I’ve encountered huge disparities in the number of books read by children – including the more able – on a weekly or termly basis. This is often about expectations; there should be an expectation that everyone is reading, regardless of whether this is reflected at home.
While more able learners may not appear to need much support with their reading, the challenge is in helping them access the right books. When a child enjoys a book, teachers should think laterally to identify others they’re likely to enjoy – by the same or a similar author, covering a related subject matter, with a similar tone or perspective.
There are also authors who are well-known for raising the sorts of topics that are fascinating to an intelligent child – such as Geraldine McCaughrean, Hilary McKay or Philip Pullman – and teachers should be able to point their more able learners towards these writers.
Reading for life
Young people are not kept wrapped in china on a shelf, as we know. They worry about things – especially bright children, in my experience. Books remind them that they are not alone. Their worries are not just theirs; they’re shared by many others, and people approach them in different ways.
No story starts with a happy family, followed by 150 pages in which nothing bad happens; that’s just not interesting. Even if it’s a comedy, there’s always something going wrong. But most children’s books do offer some light, somewhere to go, some way to think about things in a more positive way – and that’s very important in helping children develop ways to cope when they feel overwhelmed.
Children who read a lot have a deeper understanding not just of other people’s behaviour and how they think, but of their own. Self-knowledge is the most valuable of the virtues. We all see people who make the same mistakes over and over again – and it’s because they don’t actually know themselves.
But aside from the many benefits, what a waste of time not reading, when there’s so much absorbing pleasure in it!
Tags:
English
libraries
literacy
reading
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Georghia Ellinas,
01 December 2017
Updated: 08 April 2019
|
Georghia Ellinas, Head of Learning at Globe Education, explains how Shakespeare’s stories can be used from an early age to develop engagement with oral and written narrative – and a whole lot more…
Narrative is a central element in the National Curriculum – for good reason. Storytelling is at the heart of human identity, communication, and our understanding of the world. Through the telling and interpretation of stories, learners develop not only their vocabulary and command of language, but also their cognitive skills, empathy, sense of self, and engagement with moral and emotional issues.
Good stories also prepare learners for engaging with the range of literature they will encounter throughout their school careers and in their personal reading. That is why it is important to offer them interesting stories from the start.
And what greater storyteller than Shakespeare to engage learners of all ages and abilities?
The power of performance
There’s a common misconception that Shakespeare is too challenging for young children or for those coming to English as a second language. In fact, the perceived difficulty of Shakespearean language is irrelevant when children are motivated to learn and use it, through immersion in role play and oral exploration of the plays.
Inviting learners to act out the stories – putting themselves inside the minds and predicaments of Shakespearean characters at key moments in the narrative – provides a first-hand immersive experience which means they use language in a much more powerful way.
This performative, oral phase is an essential precursor to developing learners’ writing skills. The written work they go on to produce is much more creative and confident, grounded in a real emotional engagement with the story, characters and language. Having had that immersive experience, learners are motivated to challenge themselves, and you get that wonderful language development that takes place when children hear and use very rich language.
Shakespearean philosophy for children
Beyond the development of speaking and writing skills, Shakespeare challenges learners to grapple with moral and emotional issues. By choosing the right plays, and presenting them in an engaging way, this can be made accessible to learners of all ages and abilities, starting right from the early years.
For very young children, consider a play like The Winter’s Tale. This is about jealousy – irrational jealousy – exploring the counterproductive and destructive side of being possessive of your friends. For slightly older children, a play like Twelfth Night looks at bullying – the way that, when we don’t like somebody or think they need taking down a peg or two, we gang up on them – and how unfair that is, no matter how difficult that person may be.
All of this gives learners a foundation they will build on throughout their education, up to GCSE and beyond – understanding story structure, analysing characters and their motivations, describing contexts, assessing moral dilemmas. It also gives them tools for life, developing attributes such as empathy, which are essential for a happy life.
Children as Storytellers
These goals and principles underpin Globe Education’s Children as Storytellers project, launched in 2012 to support primary schools in developing learners’ storytelling skills using Shakespeare. Running over a course of 10 weeks, the project offers interactive workshops for learners, CPD for teachers, and an interactive storytelling session in their school. Hearing the story together is the best way to build a shared understanding of the characters and what happens to them.
In the first half of the course, Globe Education Practitioners use role play-based workshops to inspire learners to start using the language of the play, exploring the characters’ motivations, and thinking about the structure of the story. The second half of the course is led by school teachers, building on the use of performance and oral storytelling to develop learners’ reading and writing skills, with support from the Globe team. Over the last year we’ve also extended the project to run sessions for family members, engaging them in telling stories, asking questions, and developing their child’s critical thinking.
Headteachers and teachers involved in the project highlight its capacity to stretch and challenge not only their learners, but themselves as well – giving them fresh tools and approaches with which to unlock Shakespeare, and prompting them to rethink what they can offer even their youngest learners.
How to get involved
NACE is delighted to be working in partnership with Globe Education this year, to support NACE members in providing challenge through all phases of the English curriculum. To access free resources to support teaching and learning using Shakespeare – including lesson plans, revision guides, videos and interactive online tools – visit The Globe’s Teach Shakespeare website.
To find out more about the Children as Storytellers project, and to discuss running the project at your own school, contact the Globe Education team on +44 (0)20 7902 1435 or email learningenquiries@shakespearesglobe.com.
Tags:
CPD
English
free resources
Shakespeare
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Belle Cottingham,
28 November 2017
Updated: 08 April 2019
|
In this second of two blog posts, mathematics consultant Belle Cottingham outlines five approaches to ensuring more able learners are effectively challenged within a maths mastery curriculum.
In my previous blog post, I argued that a maths mastery approach holds the key to ensuring our more able learners develop the creative problem-solving skills they need for success – not only in exams, but in life more generally.
Of course, this is all great in theory, but how do we effectively achieve differentiation in maths mastery? There isn’t a strict right or wrong answer, but here are five approaches to try…
1. Anticipate and adapt.
Good teachers anticipate. They know their learners and anticipate what they may say, what mistakes they may make, what answers they may give. All learners are different, with different strengths. Just because a learner is more capable at calculation, doesn’t necessarily mean that s/he is also more able at problem-solving or shapes.
Anticipating answers is not easy; it takes years of experience and constant growth and development from the teacher’s point of view. However, the more accurate the anticipation, the better the tasks and the more appropriate the challenges the teacher can set.
2. Use skilful questioning to promote conceptual understanding.
Mastery is not about doing repetitive questions. In fact, the beauty of mathematics itself, with or without mastery, is that it is infinitely stretchable. Questions can be solved in more than one way. Questions can be asked in more than one way.
For example, let’s imagine a group of children are learning the 8 times table. Some will be quicker than others. Some may already recall the tables. Just because they can recall them, however, doesn’t mean that they understand why.
“Why is 8 x 3 the same as 3 x 8?” “What does 8 x 6 look like?” “Is 8 x 6 > 6 x 9?” These are just some of the ways the question can be asked or extended.
Each of these questions will make learners think beyond the simple calculation. A calculator can calculate; a brain can reason, question, explore… Brains were built for exactly that!
3. Use problems that can be extended for more able learners.
The choice of tasks and questions used in the classroom should be carefully considered and selected. The questions should be set so everyone in the classroom can readily attempt them, falling within the overall knowledge bracket, but they should also be suitable for simple extension to challenge and deepen understanding.
Continuing the tables theme, a question like “Find different ways to calculate 12 x 4” can be very rich in answers.
Some students may add 12 + 12 + 12 + 12, making links between addition and multiplication.
Others use the multiplication facts that already know. The 2 and 10 times tables are taught before the 12 times table. Hence, they can calculate 2 x 4, 10 x 4, then add the results.
Or they can simply use the properties of multiplying by 4, double, then double again. 12 x 2 = 24 and 24 x 2 = 48.
There are many ways to think about multiplying two numbers, and each of them can link to other ideas, concepts and applications.
4. Use concrete pictorial and abstract (“CPA”) representation.
More able learners can benefit as much as their peers from the use of CPA representation to visualise and represent mathematics in different ways.
Providing concrete material for everyone will facilitate more able learners’ need to meet problems which are presented in different ways, in different contexts and with use of more varied vocabulary. Using the table question, more able learners may use counters or marbles to explain to a partner what 6 x 8 looks like. Being able to articulate the mathematical thinking is a very important skill that we need our future mathematicians, engineers, teachers and doctors to have.
More able learners may also be encouraged to work in mixed-ability groups and asked to write a question based on a picture they see, or write a question that has a mistake in it… The options of extending a mathematical task are limitless and the more it happens, the more robust the mathematical foundation in our learners will be.
5. Allow time to explore, think and reflect.
This is very important for all learning to happen. The mastery approach provides this. Reflecting on mistakes that a learner has made herself, or that someone else in the classroom made, is a very good strategy that can be used to clear any misconceptions, and is particularly effective through the learners’ own voices. Having time for reflection is crucial in creating maps of knowledge that can be used in developing future concepts or embedding the roots of the existing ones.
Mathematics consultant Belle Cottingham has a Masters in Mathematics and Learning, and a decade’s experience in teaching and tutoring maths for all ages and abilities. A member of the Mathematical Association, Association of Teachers of Mathematics, National Association of Mathematics Advisers, and Japan’s Project Impuls, she writes for the Mathematical Pie Magazine and has authored teaching guides and textbooks, including contributions to the Rising Stars Mathematics range. You can follow her on WordPress and Twitter.
Tags:
mastery
maths
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Belle Cottingham,
27 November 2017
Updated: 21 March 2019
|
In this blog post, mathematics consultant Belle Cottingham argues that a maths mastery approach holds the key to ensuring more able learners develop the creative problem-solving skills needed for success – not only in exams, but in their future careers.
“We don’t do differentiation now, we do mastery instead!” I was recently told by a school teacher.
The more I discuss mastery with teachers, the more I encounter a general misunderstanding in the application of it. It seems to be a commonly held belief that when using a mastery approach, all learners must be doing the same work and move through the programme at the same pace. It therefore follows that those considered “more able” suffer from a lack of differentiation.
Is that what mastery is about? Shouldn’t the more able be accelerated? What should learners do in a mixed-ability class if they have finished the question? How can a teacher manage learners’ work when some complete the task quickly and others need more time to grasp the concepts?
These are challenging questions for most teachers and educators, and at present there is little clear guidance.
Depth, not speed
Of course, the answer is simple: yes, there should be differentiation. But how can this be achieved in a mixed-ability class where teachers are often already maxed out in terms of time and resource?
Prior to the mastery approach, more able learners were usually accelerated by moving through the curriculum faster than others. For example, if most of the class was learning how to multiply, accelerated learners who knew how to multiply were taught how to divide.
Is learning a tick-box exercise? Does teaching someone to drive make them immediately a driver? Is the breadth and depth of a question important too?
Learning takes time.
When mastery is truly applied as it was intended, learners get the opportunity to explore and deepen their understanding beyond the boundaries set within the national curriculum.
There is always more to learn; there are always new ways to look at a concept. Learning is not a linear concept; it’s a curve that moves up and down, constantly changing. A process of evolution. Learning is not about memorising steps, or reeling out answers parrot fashion. It’s about developing ideas, making connections, clearly understanding the why behind the question, rather than racing straight to the answer.
Why we need maths mastery
In 2017 the pass boundary in GCSE mathematics (grade 4) for our learners was 17%.
17%! That’s what young people – our future nurses, dentists, architects, plumbers – needed to pass the exam. There was still a drop in the number of students that passed the exam. To achieve the maximum grade possible (grade 9), our most able learners had to achieve only 80%.
I wonder how we compare with our neighbours? Or other developed countries? Sometimes I think it is best not to know the answer, and this may be one of those times. In my view, 17% to pass and 80% to achieve the maximum grade is simply not good enough. Were the exams that difficult? Was the mathematics used so advanced? What is happening to our brightest learners from primary schools when they enter secondary school?
I recently worked with a group of 20 students in Year 11. Their GCSE grade targets were 7 and 8. I gave them the second question from a GCSE specimen paper. The first few questions are usually the ones everyone can access, but that’s not what I found at all.
Out of 20 learners in the group only three managed to solve the question independently. The other 17 said they were unsure what “proportion” was. They were considered “good” students in school (based on previous results). They wanted to do well in their GCSEs. They wanted to solve the question. They just didn’t know how. So where are we failing?
Developing creative problem-solving skills
Why are our more able learners unable to solve a question unless we ask them specifically what we want and tell them how we want it? What happened to initiative, taking risks, trying things, not being afraid?
There is no point asking learners to think critically, extend their knowledge and problem solve in exams if we haven’t invested time and energy teaching them how to do this. We can’t expect our learners to solve a question in different ways if teachers have been trained to explain a concept in only a single way.
Change doesn’t happen overnight. For teachers to embed new practices they need to see evidence that they work, and they need to know that they will have the time to implement change and see it through without external meddling. They need to buy into the idea.
This summer I was lucky enough to observe seven primary and secondary schools in Japan. They were all mixed classes of 30-40 students. All the lessons I saw were based around a single task. If the learner solved the task in one way, s/he immediately moved to a second method and then a third and so on. I was surprised to see that the more able learners didn’t look bored when they had solved the task in one way. They knew exactly what was expected of them – they just kept going, trying, drawing graphs, using algebra, exploring...
If this was possible in a classroom of 40 learners, it’s certainly possible in our schools. Frankly, Japanese results speak for themselves. Japan is consistently ranked in the top five countries for mathematics, according to TIMSS results.
What is particularly impressive when you analyse the TIMMS results is Japanese learners’ aptitude for solving questions they have never seen before. As can be seen from the illustration below, though only 54% of the material from the test had been taught in Japanese schools (different countries have different curricula), learners in Japan achieved an average of 69%. They could solve questions they hadn’t been taught because of their mathematical thinking/reasoning ability.
Is this an important skill in life? Well, a problem wouldn’t be a problem if we knew the answer beforehand!
Instead of accelerating children through the curriculum, the maths mastery approach supports deeper understanding and exploration – allowing more able learners to develop creative problem-solving skills that will serve them well not only in exams, but in their future careers.
Continuous improvement
All these ideas may be simple to apply, but knowing when to use them and how to use them can be challenging. Our teachers need the right resources, support and training to be able to adapt and grow themselves. It is simply not good enough to roll out a concept and expect people to organically learn. For our learners to solve tasks in multiple ways, they must be taught by teachers who themselves are capable of using different approaches to solve tasks. This may sound obvious, but a lot of teachers will have grown up in an education system where learning through repetition was rife. Consequently, structures must exist to provide guidance where this is needed.
For the maths mastery approach to be successful in the UK for children of all ages and abilities, we need to allow time for that to happen. Countries like Singapore and Japan have been working throughout the 1980s and 90s to shift their national approach gradually to a mastery model. What we see now is the result of years of relentless work from teachers, authors, parents and learners. Importantly, this process remains ongoing in these countries with frequent reflection and improvements/adjustments being made – which is of course consistent with mastery. There is always room to improve and learn more!
Mathematics consultant Belle Cottingham has a Masters in Mathematics and Learning, and a decade’s experience in teaching and tutoring maths for all ages and abilities. A member of the Mathematical Association, Association of Teachers of Mathematics, National Association of Mathematics Advisers, and Japan’s Project Impuls, she writes for the Mathematical Pie Magazine and has authored teaching guides and textbooks, including contributions to the Rising Stars Mathematics range. You can follow her on WordPress and Twitter.
For Belle’s advice on how to challenge more able learners within a maths mastery approach, click here.
Tags:
mastery
maths
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Lesley Hill,
06 November 2017
Updated: 22 December 2020
|
Lesley Hill, headteacher of NACE member Lavender Primary School in North London, shares her school’s approach to ensuring the curriculum remains broad, engaging and meaningful – alongside a successful focus on good outcomes for all learners.
“Lavender” School conjures images of a delightful school in a leafy suburb. It is a delightful school, but we have our challenges. The number of children with English as an additional language, and of those eligible for FSM, are both above national averages. We also have a high number of children with need. However, challenges are not just about closing gaps, and when it comes to curriculum one particular challenge is to hold on to what is important.
In the late 80s, I was an advocate of themes, of helping children see links in learning and maximising creativity. Although I understood the need for a national curriculum (to avoid children potentially repeating the same topic year after year!), I had serious concerns about a rigid, dictated and narrow curriculum that would merely feed standardised tests.
A few decades (and curriculum reviews) on, and I don’t believe that prescription has to stifle creativity, or that children have to learn within a narrow framework to get results.
Empowering learners to make choices… and mistakes
For some years, most of our subject teaching has been done through cross-curricular topics and we insist on at least one pupil choice topic per year. Classes or year groups vote on different themes and teachers ensure that the statutory knowledge and skills are covered within the topic. In KS2, we aim to include children in the planning process by asking them to consider how the required topic content could be taught.
Our use of pupil voice helps to engage and motivate our learners, but we also want them to have ownership over their learning. The introduction of growth mindset five years ago made a marked difference in terms of attitude, and was particularly empowering for those higher-achieving learners who find it so hard to “get something wrong”.
Developing skills for self-evaluation and reflection
Learning to learn strategies were also embedded and this culture enabled us to introduce fast, effective feedback a year ago. Teachers do not write in any books, but mark verbally during lessons, through 1:1 or group conferencing. Children peer- and self-assess and write reflections on their learning against success criteria. The self-evaluative process needs higher-order thinking, and allows learners at all levels to develop those skills.
Meta-cognition is promoted through peer work and is particularly successful for higher achievers when working with lower achieving or younger children (such as through our Reading Buddy scheme). Talk partners are therefore picked randomly to allow a range of peer-work experience. Group and paired feedback has been successful across the curriculum. I opened a sketch book recently and read, “I spoke with my partner and we thought that I should put more shading and detail on the petals.” Our “drafting and crafting” approach is used across the curriculum, enabling children to reflect on all learning, not just the core subjects.
Encouraging creativity at home
The fact that we value all subjects is visible in our homework policy. Learners have the usual spellings and number facts to learn, but also work on given topic themes. Because the titles are quite open (such as “Enfield Town”), children can access them and deepen their learning according to their own starting points. On home-learning day, you might see children carefully manoeuvring a model volcano, clutching a home-made booklet about local history or a USB stick with a slideshow about chocolate. They might just have a sheet of notes that have been prepared for a “lecture”. They share these projects at school, paying special attention to their presentation skills, which are then peer- and self-evaluated.
Extracurricular experiences and engagement
Visits and outings are built into our curriculum. We develop enterprise and aspiration through trips to businesses and institutions, such as Cambridge University, and by inviting in key people. We value working with others, getting involved with school cluster creative projects wherever possible. Last year, we were able to buy in a British Sign Language (BSL) teacher from a partner school to teach sign language to every class from nursery to Y6. We also encourage entries to events such as the annual Chess Tournament and Mayor’s Award for Writing, and are in the process of organising a spelling bee across our partner schools.
Home-school partnerships are important to us. Family days, where parents come in and work alongside their children, as well as exhibitions and information fairs, help us to share our wider curriculum. One event saw parents being led on a tour through the WWI trenches and, last year, families came in to learn the school song (written by the children themselves). We also work to build wider community links through events such as bulb planting with the local park group, or charity choir performances. Our School Council representatives are confident and vocal when considering local and wider issues and how we can support others.
What does it all mean?
Lavender's results are very pleasing across all key stages. Our GLD, phonics, KS1 and KS2 combined outcomes remain above national figures, with progress data of our higher-achieving children being better than national in all subjects.
OK, so Year 6 do have to do practice tests and more homework than most, but you'll still catch them sneaking into my office during a unit on mystery texts, going through my bin, and desperately trying to work out if I'm actually a spy. Despite budget pressures, I will continue to find the money for Herbie's insurance (our school dog's work with the most vulnerable children is priceless) and I’ll always value our subject leaders for the passion and drive they bring to our curriculum.
Data will always be top of my agenda, but it's there alongside breadth, depth and enrichment. A broad and balanced curriculum doesn't have to be at the expense of good outcomes for our children.
Lesley Hill is headteacher of Lavender Primary School, a popular two-form entry school in North London, part of the Ivy Learning Trust and a member of NACE. She has taught across the primary age range and has also worked in adult basic education and on teacher training programmes. Her current role includes the design and delivery of leadership training at middle and senior leader level, and she also provides workshops on a range of subjects, such as growth mindset and marking. Her book, Once Upon a Green Pen, which explores creating the right school culture, is due to be released early next year.
Tags:
creativity
curriculum
enrichment
metacognition
mindset
parents and carers
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|