 
|
Posted By Rob Lightfoot,
13 October 2020
|
Rob Lightfoot, NACE Associate and R&D Hub Lead
How can you engage colleagues across your school to develop a whole-school approach for more able learners? This is a common question, and a critical issue to address: for provision to be effective, it needs to be embedded as part of whole-school policy and culture.
1. Make time, even during challenging times
There is no doubt we are living in unprecedented times, and time is in especially short supply for colleagues in schools. In normal circumstances, you would spend time finding your advocates and working with them to display the benefits of enhancing provision for your more able students. There is no doubt that when your provision is strong for more able students, then the achievement of all students improves too. In the end this is not creating additional work for staff; it will just mean doing things differently. Though it may be hard to make time to review what could be improved for the more able, ultimately this will be worthwhile and have a positive impact for a much wider group – as set out in the NACE core principles.
2. Involve your school leadership team
Lead teachers for more able students must understand they cannot make the necessary changes on their own. The SLT has to be a central part of the process. Some lead teachers will already be part of the SLT, others will not. It is critical that the provision for more able students is discussed at a senior level so necessary procedures can be put in place across all departments or year groups. Consistency is the key if you are to create the biggest impact for students in your school.
3. Start work behind the scenes
Every school is in a different place. If you have been given the role of lead teacher for more able students but the staff around you cannot consider any changes at present, then there is plenty you can do behind the scenes, starting with an audit of your school’s current provision. If you do have advocates in your school already, then you can give them the same access to the NACE resources that are available to you (read more here). As I said previously, an advocate within the SLT is crucial.
4. Share the benefits of your NACE membership
Finally, consider how you can share the benefits of NACE membership with colleagues. Engagement in the NACE R&D Hubs would be a great opportunity for other teachers in the school with a passion for providing the best possible outcomes for your more able learners. The webinars are also a great source for whole-school CPD. Please be aware that all these resources and opportunities are available for every member of staff in your school, not just the lead teacher or the SLT.
For additional guidance and ideas, take a look at our “getting started” guide.
Useful links:
Tags:
collaboration
curriculum
leadership
lockdown
myths and misconceptions
policy
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By NACE,
06 February 2020
|
Curriculum review and development is high on the agenda for all schools. The new Ofsted and ISI inspection frameworks and the new Curriculum for Wales emphasise the importance of an ambitious curriculum vision with sufficient breadth and depth to meet the needs of all learners at all phases, including the most able.
Read on to learn more about how the tool could support your school.
What can the NACE Curriculum Audit Tool be used for?
The NACE Curriculum Audit Tool can be used for a variety of purposes. Use of the tool gives a sharp focus on curriculum provision for more able learners in a school’s care. Importantly, it helps school leaders to reflect on the performance of the more able, gauge curriculum strengths and identify areas for development.
How can the tool help to improve more provision in my school?
The tool helps schools to methodically and systematically reflect on the performance of and provision for more able learners. It allows schools to gauge where strengths lie and to identify areas in need of further development for this specific group of learners.
How can the tool help schools focusing on curriculum development?
The Audit Tool will support schools in developing their vision and principles for curriculum design, providing useful prompters and criteria for schools exploring key questions such as “What should we teach and why?”
How can the tool help schools in Wales focusing on curriculum reform?
The Welsh version of the audit tool has been specifically designed and structured to evaluate present curriculum strategy and provision, with flexibility and adaptability for schools to use it to move in line with education innovation and reform.
How will the tool complement other self-evaluation methods used by schools in Wales?
Self-evaluation is at the heart of the Welsh school improvement journey and effective schools systematically use robust self-evaluation to progress. In inspection reports, Estyn often cites weaknesses in the challenge that schools provide for more able learners.
The Audit Tool provides schools with an objective starting point and structure through which to review, challenge, test and develop curriculum. In this way it involves all the school. It allows an in-depth examination of the component parts of a school which make up the whole.
It is specifically designed to sharply focus on the evaluation of curriculum provision in order to judge whether this meets the needs of more able learners and to signpost the way forward. It is not intended to replace other self-evaluation processes and procedures employed by the school, but to supplement and enhance them whilst at the same time avoiding unnecessary overlap.
Who would use the Audit Tool to carry out self-evaluation?
Evaluations may be carried out by all school stakeholders. Leaders and middle managers would use the tool to make judgements on current provision and performance, overall or focusing on a particular subject/phase. Outcomes can be used strategically to identify school priorities in order to meet the needs of more able learners. Teachers and support staff can use the tool to help judge the effectiveness of curriculum provision and the parameter of learner capabilities. It will help to evaluate more able pupils’ learning to date, and to identify next steps of learning.
What benefits will teachers and support staff gain from using the Audit Tool?
Given the chance to evaluate the curriculum they provide for more able learners, teachers and support staff are more likely to self-reflect on their own performance and become more responsible and accountable for the teaching and learning experiences they provide. When staff can see that the outcomes of their self-evaluation are being taken seriously and acted on by senior leaders, it can prove to be a motivating experience which consolidates trust and confidence across the whole school community.
Can learners participate in the curriculum audit process?
Self-evaluation is always at its most effective when all stakeholders are fully involved. Changing learners’ roles from passive observers to active participants and valued contributors has the greatest impact on engagement. In best practice, learners are routinely encouraged to self-evaluate.
Effective self-evaluation offers opportunities for learners to look at themselves, reflect on how they best learn, acquaint themselves with the unknown, be guided on to new learning and to develop as ambitious, capable learners. Becoming part of the decision-making process makes it more likely for those involved to fully engage in the decisions that are made. Learner voice is a powerful force and often we can learn as much from children and young people as they learn from us.
To find out more and to access the NACE Quality of Education Curriculum Audit Tool, click here.
Tags:
curriculum
school improvement
self-evaluation
student voice
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Elaine Ricks-Neal,
11 November 2019
|
NACE Challenge Award Adviser Elaine Ricks-Neal reviews emerging trends from the first round of Ofsted reports under the new education inspection framework (EIF).
There’s certainly a very different feel to the new Ofsted reports. Whilst they are clearly written with parents in mind – reflected in the use of accessible terminology and avoidance of too much detail in the published reports – there is no doubt that schools’ curriculum design and delivery is under forensic scrutiny. And although there is little explicit reference to more able learners, the importance of high-quality provision for this group is implicit in the strong focus on curriculum planning, subject-level provision, and breadth and depth of learning.
Style and structure of the new reports
The reports are written in a surprisingly simple style which Ofsted has said is intended to be parent-friendly, getting right to the point and largely steering clear of education jargon – for example, “The school is not a results factory.”
Both section 8 and section 5 reports look very similar, each opening with a short paragraph addressing the question “What is it like to attend this school?” – summing up the school ethos, behaviour, attendance and day-to-day opportunities. In most cases, the report’s opening statements are positive, but any issue linked with behaviour or low standards will be simply – even bluntly – highlighted; for example, “Pupils enjoy school, but they should be doing much better.”
The reports then move on to the main section: “What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?” – bundling together judgements for the quality of education, personal development, and leadership and management. This can make it quite hard to tease out the reasons for any difference in section 5 judgements of any of these strands.
Finally, there is a paragraph on safeguarding, followed by improvement points.
What key themes are emerging?
· Focus on curriculum design and subject plans
The reports may have a simple style, but it’s clear that curriculum plans and schemes of work have really been unpicked to check how well “subject leaders plan the curriculum so that pupils build on their knowledge so that they know and remember more”. If your curriculum is not coherent and well thought-through, there is no hiding place. Not surprisingly, a very frequent weakness is that subject planning is not “precisely planned and sequenced.” In primary schools this is often in foundation subjects. There is also real drilling down into phonics, the reading curriculum, mathematics and the quality of SEND provision.
If standards are referred to, which is not the case in all reports, it is usually a simple broad comment – for example, “pupils achieve well” – and linked back to how well subjects are planned and taught. This doesn’t mean results are not deemed important, and schools which have dropped a grade will usually have a critical comment about standards, but the emphasis is on the impact of curriculum and the way it is planned and taught in bringing about those outcomes.
· Warnings against curriculum narrowing
In secondary schools, there is the same focus on sequential planning, but also criticism of any perceived curriculum narrowing or lack of entitlement, especially for SEND and disadvantaged pupils. Also under scrutiny are the two-year KS3, low EBacc uptake and sixth-formers who are not accessing work experience. This may be unsettling for many secondary schools who might feel they will now need a curriculum rethink to avoid Ofsted disapproval.
In primary schools, if pupils miss lessons for intervention sessions, a judgement may be made as to whether they are missing out too much on the full curriculum.
What about more able learners?
There is no doubt that breadth and depth of learning is highly valued in this framework and that must be good news for more able learners. Though there is not much explicit reference to able learners, there is a strong focus on how well plans build on what learners already know, and where schools do less well, there is typically a reference to work being “too easy for some” or lack of challenge.
A good deal of attention is also paid to the depth of teachers’ subject knowledge and the need for learners to have access to “demanding” reading texts. Schools which do very well are complimented for adapting lesson plans well, having an “ambitious curriculum”, or learning being sequenced to develop “deep understanding” with teachers “building on what pupils already know to achieve the highest standards” (examples from an outstanding school judgement).
So, the focus on more able learners is there, though not as we saw it before due to the new “general audience” style of the reports. It is clear that inspectors are digging much deeper than the brevity of the reports might suggest, with a strong focus on the substance and quality of the curriculum and the day-to-day experience. This should ultimately benefit all learners, including the most able.
Tags:
curriculum
leadership
Ofsted
parents and carers
policy
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Sean Harford,
30 September 2019
|
Sean Harford, Ofsted National Director, Education, outlines the renewed focus on personal development in the new inspection framework.
Our new education inspection framework (EIF), which we introduced at the beginning of this academic year, has personal development at its heart. By now, you should be able to read the first new-style inspection reports, specifically focused on informing parents. I hope you’ll find that they are shorter, clearer and more to the point.
We have also evolved the judgements. In the previous framework, we judged ‘personal development, behaviour and welfare’, but under the EIF we will report separately on ‘personal development’ and ‘behaviour and attitudes’. Why, you may ask?
Our idea is that the ‘personal development’ section will explain to parents how schools are helping to develop pupils’ character and resilience, through activities such as sport, music and debating. And we have also taken the opportunity to build the grade descriptors on research and enable inspectors to recognise the pastoral support that schools are providing for their pupils. This is linked to our new focus on schools having a broad and rich curriculum.
That is because our new approach means that instead of inspectors trying to understand schools through reams of data from test and examinations, they will be talking to school leaders and teachers about the real substance of education: the curriculum.
Teachers have told us they believe this approach will help to reduce their workload. I hope it will mean that teachers will have more time to focus on what they teach and how they teach it – which is why they entered this great profession in the first place.
We are also going to be checking that schools have an inclusive culture. This includes teaching those pupils who are the most able, and who may need to be challenged that bit more.
In short, our inspectors are taking a rounded view of the quality of education that a school provides to all its pupils, which means the most able pupils as much as poorer pupils and their peers with special educational needs and/or disability.
Read more Ofsted updates
Tags:
character
curriculum
Ofsted
personal development
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Jamie Kisiel,
14 June 2019
Updated: 05 August 2019
|
The NACE Challenge Award is far more than just a certificate or tick-box exercise, as Jamie Kisiel, Teaching and Learning Coordinator at NACE member Langley School explains…
Our decision to pursue accreditation with the NACE Challenge Award was originally generated from a surprising (to the school) target identified by the ISI (Independent Schools Inspectorate). Our 2017 ISI report found that “more able pupils are not always sufficiently challenged to fulfil their academic potential”, generating a target to “ensure that all lessons provide sufficient challenge for more able pupils so that they are provided more opportunity to explore concepts and exploit their potential.”
The above was contrary to the school's efforts to increase rigour and challenge in the curriculum. So, following a review of strategic planning options, we decided that, although we had been working on challenge, we had not been doing enough to make a material impact. We decided to pursue the NACE Challenge Award, which would give us a framework to intrinsically address these targets as well as providing a wider vehicle for change.
1. Clear structure for school review and improvement
The NACE Challenge Framework provides a structure for schools seeking the NACE Challenge Award – but more importantly it offers a blueprint to build and drive challenge initiatives forward, developing a challenging academic environment for all. The Framework is categorised into six key elements which combine to ensure high-quality provision for more able learners, within the context of challenge for all. Through our focus on Element 3 (which relates to curriculum, teaching and support), a strategy to embed the Framework and develop a challenge initiative soon emerged.
2. Improve the quality of challenge for all learners
“A rising tide lifts all ships” – Joseph Renzulli.
Improving provision for the more able opens the doors of opportunity. The NACE Challenge Development Programme has given us a structure to introduce and maintain high-quality provision at whole-school, teaching and support levels. By emphasising challenge for all learners, including those with high abilities, a philosophy of enquiry and investigation can be nourished. A positive culture of learning continues to grow and develop, with opportunities to challenge mindset creating a more dynamic approach.
3. Challenge for staff, as well as students
The Challenge Framework requires that schools focus on developing challenge both for learners and for staff. This two-pronged approach helps to embed an ethos of challenge that permeates within and beyond the classroom. Staff are encouraged to become reflective practitioners and explore ways to professionally challenge themselves, whether it be through action research projects or coaching/mentoring programmes. This facilitates a symbiotic relationship where both students and staff work through the emotional struggles and triumphs by pushing personal boundaries, developing empathy in the process.
4. Develop in-school action research
The Challenge Framework provides a structured audit process that clearly identifies areas for improvement. Within these areas, schools can develop professional enquiries to address identified issues and investigate potential solutions and strategies for improvement. Regardless of size and scope, action research projects can provide practitioners with excellent opportunities for professional development that are tailored to an area of interest and bespoke to the school’s context and priorities. These investigations can be supported and shared through the NACE Research and Development Hubs – which offer regional-level guidance and support for practitioners conducting research with a focus on provision for more able learners.
5. Professional networking and peer support
Along the journey towards Challenge Award accreditation (and beyond), NACE offers a wide range of support, including formal training and INSET as well as opportunities to connect with peers. Free networking days such as the NACE member meetup I attended in Oxford last term have proved invaluable – offering a platform to generate and exchange ideas with likeminded practitioners, and an opportunity to establish contacts. These networks can then be used to create links across schools to benefit both students and staff. Many schools that have achieved the Challenge Award are very open to collaboration and support, whether through resources or observation days.
Find out more…
The NACE Challenge Award is an accreditation given to schools evidencing school-wide high-quality provision for more able learners, based on the detailed criteria of the NACE Challenge Framework. Both are part of the Challenge Development Programme, which also offers bespoke CPD and consultancy for schools seeking to improve their provision in this area. To find out more, click here or contact NACE to discuss available support and next steps for your school.
Tags:
Challenge Award
Challenge Framework
CPD
research
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Jon Murphy,
16 May 2019
Updated: 09 September 2020
|
Jon Murphy, Executive Headteacher of Llanfoist Fawr and Llanvihangel Crucorney Primary Schools, explains why he’s optimistic about the new freedoms presented by the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022.
While observing an inspiring Year 5 lesson as part of an assessment for the NACE Challenge Award, my eye was drawn to a statement above the whiteboard: “Who says the sky’s the limit when there are footsteps on the moon?” Push beyond our thin and fragile atmosphere, escape the boundaries created by gravity and a whole new exciting world of exploration, discovery and possibility emerges. Those words have remained with me and have become a guiding principle in my work with more able and talented (MAT) children.
The national curriculum defines parameters within which to operate, bringing both benefits and limitations. Key phases create their own “gravity” which can hold teachers and learners within fixed boundaries. Over-prescribed curriculum content stifles creativity, exploration and discovery, particularly for those with an independent spirit and capability. Boundaries create barriers to learning.
However, with the new Curriculum for Wales, we are being provided with the wonderful opportunity to change the way we teach our young people. We are on the verge of the introduction of a totally different approach, which promises the removal of boundaries, resulting in the creation of exciting educational discoveries that will challenge the way we think, the way we teach and the way we prepare our young people for the future. The significant change needed for curriculum reform will challenge us as professionals and by the same token will allow us the freedom to transform the way we challenge our more able learners.
The story so far…
30 April 2019 saw the publication of the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022. Within the Federation of Llanfoist Fawr and Llanvihangel Primary Schools, preparation for curriculum reform started long before the publication of the draft orders. Professor Graham Donald’s Successful Futures report, the catalyst which led to curriculum reform, provided the starting point for our own journey of curriculum transformation. We followed its progression through to the white paper, Our National Mission: A Transformational Curriculum, which gave us sight of the legislative proposals for Curriculum Wales 2022.
Although the details of the new Curriculum for Wales have only recently become available to all schools in draft form, carefully considered strategic planning has provided us with a head start in our preparations for implementation. Fundamental to the new curriculum are the Four Purposes which guide educational priorities and underpin teaching and learning to ensure learners become:
- Ambitious, capable learners who are ready to learn throughout their lives;
- Enterprising, creative contributors who are ready to play a full part in life and work;
- Ethical, informed citizens who are ready to be citizens of Wales and the world;
- Healthy, confident individuals who are ready to lead fulfilling lives as valued members of society.
Already the Four Purposes are a regular and natural part of the everyday new curriculum vocabulary used by pupils and staff. The purposes chime so well with the aspirations we have always held for our more able learners. We have created a vision and aims that are aligned to the purposes of the new curriculum, and although early days, we are already striving to ensure our vision ultimately comes to fruition through the introduction of new pedagogical approaches. We have moved away from the traditional subject coordinator role and allocated staff to the six Areas of Learning and Experience (AoLE) – expressive arts; health and wellbeing; humanities; literacy, languages and communication; mathematics and numeracy; science and technology – creating curriculum teams which bring together colleagues’ existing skills, knowledge and expertise.
Preparing for change: the role of the PLL
Although not a Pioneer School involved in the initial shaping of the curriculum, we have worked closely with our Pioneer colleagues to keep abreast of innovation and change. Pivotal to our work with Pioneer Schools has been the internal appointment of a Professional Learning Lead (PLL) – an initiative introduced by the South East Wales Consortium (EAS). Due to the significant changes in pedagogical approach needed to deliver the new Curriculum for Wales, it is essential to appoint a PLL with extensive skills, knowledge and experience in child development to ensure the curriculum is designed to meet the needs of every individual pupil, regardless of ability.
In addition to success as a subject leader across a number of areas, our own PLL has extensive experience as an Additional Learning Needs Coordinator and is also our More Able and Talented Coordinator. A key role for the PLL is to oversee the development of the 12 Pedagogical Principles across the six AoLEs, which are at the heart of curriculum reform. Currently our PLL is developing staff knowledge and understanding of the “what matters” concepts in each AoLE – headline statements that outline and organise learning. The “what matters” statements make connections to the Four Purposes to ensure learners acquire the appropriate knowledge, skills and experiences in each AoLE.
An operational starting point for staff has been involvement in the redesign of our planning templates to address the elements of the new curriculum framework. We are now making our first attempts to pilot planning and curriculum design for delivery of the new AoLEs.
Ensuring consistency and coherence
Successful implementation of the new national curriculum will be dependent on the quality of professional development provided for staff, upskilling them in the pedagogical approaches needed for effective delivery. Our PLL attends curriculum reform professional development opportunities facilitated by Pioneer colleagues, the EAS and other providers. She acts as a conduit bringing back into school new developments and good practice to be shared in senior leadership, staff and governors’ meetings and through facilitating school professional development days.
As a school we are already finding that professional development gained through participation in the NACE Challenge Development Programme is complementing and enhancing our curriculum reform work. We are looking at change holistically, and as a result we are carefully aligning curriculum reform with other work streams, including our transition to the six elements of the revised NACE Challenge Framework and amendment of our self-evaluation processes to address Estyn’s five inspection areas. This strategic alignment of the different systems and processes we use in school is ensuring that they work together as a coherent whole.
The freedom to let learners fly
Within the draft orders for the new curriculum are details of the principles for progression. These guide the progression of learning within each of the six AoLEs; the outlined progression steps contain achievement outcomes which can be used to identify progression of what a pupil can do as they progress in their learning. Unlike the current curriculum, which almost ties learning into key phases demarked by outcomes and levels, the progression steps are a true continuum and allow children to progress more in line with their ability – without the boundaries which can suppress progress. For more able learners there are no false ceilings; they can fly.
Teachers will need to teach differently, developing new pedagogy, assessment processes and the confidence to “let go of the reins”. Young people will have a greater say in what and how they learn. Enrichment and experiences which are an integral part of the new curriculum will allow learners to have a greater voice in how they design, guide, investigate and lead their own learning: a tantalising thought for more able learners, who will be provided with even greater opportunities to spread their wings. Through the freedom intended in the new curriculum, Welsh Government is handing us the scissors with which to cut the apron strings.
Grounds for optimism
The new Curriculum for Wales will provide a continuum of learning; the restrictive key phases present in the current curriculum will no longer exist. Transition will become smoother but at the same time will require even greater partnership and tighter transition plans to ensure a successful and seamless move for pupils from primary to secondary schools. With a learning continuum, it follows that work, which has traditionally been seen as the domain of the secondary sector, will permeate its way more readily into primary practice, an exciting prospect for more able learners who will access increasingly challenging concepts earlier in their primary career.
There is a great deal of optimism in Wales surrounding the introduction of a new curriculum. Naturally, there are concerns about resourcing and the pace and extent of change. Overall, educational professionals realise that we are on the verge of a new educational system that is non-prescriptive, boundary-free and which offers the freedom to develop learning opportunities that are genuinely bespoke to meet the needs of all learners, preparing them for work and life. We all have a lot to gain from current educational reform, and none more so than more able and talented learners.
Tags:
aspirations
curriculum
leadership
policy
progression
school improvement
Wales
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Elizabeth Allen CBE,
11 March 2019
Updated: 06 August 2019
|
Nurturing student voice is essential – but the most successful schools move beyond this to develop true student leaders, argues NACE trustee Liz Allen CBE.
Good schools are justifiably proud of systems that encourage young people to voice their perceptions, raise issues that matter to them and discuss their learning. In these schools, learners talk with their teachers and with each other, make formal presentations to peers, act as ambassadors for their school. But questions remain. Are all learners active participants? Is every student heard? What impact do their voices have on the school’s vision, values, curriculum and pedagogy?
Great schools, I would argue, have moved on from learner voice to learner leadership, and there are many fine examples of this among both primary and secondary schools accredited with the NACE Challenge Award. Their greatness rests in students’ capacity to lead their own learning, to demonstrate commitment to each other’s achievement, and to impact on the school’s strategic development. No child is too young and no context is too difficult.
“Students highlight their need for frequent one-to-one academic conversations, that are focused on individual learning skills as well as subject-specific strategies for improvement.” – Understanding the Challenge of the Exceptionally Able Learner; research undertaken by the Independent/State Schools Partnership (ISSP)
Create a “learning together” ethos
Motivated and engaged learners are keen to take responsibility for their learning and achievement, demonstrating a thirst for knowledge and a desire to become experts. They develop an extensive, advanced vocabulary, enabling them to engage in sophisticated discourse and to reflect on and improve their own learning.
The imperative on teachers is to create a subject-specific learning climate in which all students, in their own time, can grow to high cognitive ability and advanced oracy, enabling them to engage in deep learning conversations. As John Hattie has written, “The aim is to make students active in the learning process, until they can seek out optimal ways to learn new material and ideas, seek resources to help them and set appropriate and more challenging goals for themselves.” (Hattie, Visible Learning, 2009)
Schools that have created a “learning together” ethos encourage discourse between learners in all spheres of the school’s life and have structures in place that promote opportunities for students’ leadership of learning. Peer mentoring in lessons, students as academic and personal mentors to younger students, as buddies with students in other schools, as teaching assistants working alongside their teachers in younger classes – these all give learners the opportunity to grow into empathetic, caring adults, as well as enhancing their personal cognitive abilities.
A road map for school transformation
If our primary purpose is to give every child the opportunity and support to grow into a fulfilled adult, then it becomes imperative to engage them in the educational debate. When learners are asked, “Who do you want to be when you leave school?” and “What do you need from your school to help you to become that person?”, their answers can become the beginning of a road map for school transformation.
It takes school leaders’ courage, time and effort to place learners at the heart of school improvement discourse. The outcomes are high achievement, an inclusive and caring community and bright prospects for learners.
This blog post is based on an article published in the spring 2019 edition of NACE Insight – our termly members’ newsletter. To view past editions of Insight, log in to our members’ site.
Tags:
collaboration
leadership
mentoring
school improvement
student voice
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Ann McCarthy,
04 December 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
|
How effective is your use of school data? Ahead of her upcoming workshop “Using data to inform learning and secure high achievement”, NACE associate Dr Ann McCarthy shares guidance on the use of historic outcomes to target improvement in outcomes for all learners, including the more able.
This area is led by headteachers and senior leadership teams who set strategy, policy, school improvement plans and quality assurance arrangements. Senior leaders also develop middle leaders so they too can contribute to school priorities, extending the vision and policy into their areas of responsibility.
Based on effective school review and self-evaluation, school leaders highlight areas for development and improvement. They set targets which include the quality and range of school provision, progress and achievement of more and exceptionally able learners. They introduce new initiatives and practices with measurable outcomes, and promote action research to enable them to explore and implement the most effective strategies and practice.
It is important to set quantitative targets so the impact of actions can be measured objectively. This information can then be supplemented by qualitative measures of performance. Learners’ attainment and achievement targets are used to ensure all, including the most able, make appropriate progress across year groups and over time.
Six steps to implement in your school
- Put in place an action plan in response to self-evaluation and research evidence, which includes performance measures.
- Set whole-school end of key stage targets, using national benchmarks, which can be measured.
- Use the same or higher targets for interim school years.
- Set quantitative performance data targets, with attention to closing gaps in achievement between different year groups and subjects.
- Include targets for defined groups of learners including: gender; ethnicity; EAL; SEND and disadvantage.
- Identify other schools where performance is better in target areas and seek to work in collaboration or acquire support, dependent on needs.
In general, leaders would expect to see a small variation in the performance profile between year groups. This allows leaders to target marginal improvement year on year using existing data. However, where there is a significant variation in the prior performance of any given year group, these targets should be adjusted to reflect the differences.
Reviewing outcomes for more able learners
The following questions, regarding more able learners, should be considered:
- Are historic attainment outcomes in line with or better than average for similar schools or family of schools?
- What actions will lead to higher attainment and what quality assurance milestones can be put in place?
- Do more able learners make the same or better progress than other learners, relative to their starting points, and is this true regardless of learner groups?
- Have targets been put in place for all year groups and for all subjects?
- Are there any subjects or year groups where progress and attainment measures lie below whole-school targets and what specific action is in place to monitor and measure improvement?
- Have the targets been communicated effectively to middle leaders and have they acted to make changes which will lead to further improvements?
- When reflecting on the school’s position in relation to more able learners, there is a balance between where the school has been historically and what might be achieved if all barriers were removed.
This article is an excerpt from the NACE Essentials guide "Using data to improve provision for more able learners". To access this guide and the full NACE Essentials range, log in as a member.
Tags:
leadership
policy
school improvement
self-evaluation
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Hilary Lowe,
30 November 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
|
NACE Education Adviser Hilary Lowe explains the thinking behind this new resource, and suggests a range of approaches for its implementation...
The NACE Challenge Framework is designed to help schools review and plan for improvements in challenge for more able and other learners across all areas of the curriculum and school experience. To facilitate this, the latest round of updates to the Framework and supporting resources includes a new departmental and curriculum review template – available via the Challenge Hub area of our website for all schools working with the NACE Challenge Development Programme.
This new resource should help those leading on a school’s use of the Challenge Framework to engage middle leaders in the review and planning cycle. It provides key aspects from the Challenge Framework self-evaluation template, with which to interrogate provision and practice for more able learners in specific curriculum areas and plan for further developments.
The curriculum review tool will also enable middle leaders, in collaboration the school’s NACE Challenge lead, to gather and synthesise evidence of high-quality provision on a very secure footing – building a strong portfolio for submission if/when the school chooses to apply for NACE Challenge Award accreditation.
The Challenge Framework is already accompanied by detailed guidance to support the coordination of the self-evaluation process. In addition, when making use of the new departmental review template, schools could consider the following approaches:
- Choose a selection of departments/curriculum areas as “early adopters” of the review tool. These teams then present their findings to other departments, who go on to undertake their own reviews. Joint planning of next steps could take place at relevant meetings of department/curriculum leaders.
- The Challenge Framework lead works with a few/all departments to support review and development.
- A head of department/curriculum area asks a colleague to take responsibility for the review; the completed review is then used to inform planning, in the light of whole-school priorities.
- Departments/curriculum areas undertake peer reviews or triad reviews of provision for more able learners.
- All departments/areas focus on reviewing provision and practice in a specific strand of the Challenge Framework identified by senior leaders.
- The Framework is integrated within existing school self-evaluation and development systems and cycles.
Whatever the processes used, the gathering of evidence for planning, evidence of impact and for Challenge Award accreditation should rely on information gathered from all areas of the school, for each of the six key categories (“elements”) of the framework.
Evidence from individual curriculum areas is crucial and the curriculum review template will become an invaluable tool for schools using the Challenge Framework and working towards the Challenge Award.
If your school is already working with the Challenge Framework, log in to access all current NACE Challenge resources.
Not yet working with the Challenge Framework? Find out how the NACE Challenge Development Programme could support your school.
Tags:
curriculum
leadership
school improvement
self-evaluation
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Jon Murphy,
14 November 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
|
Jon Murphy, Headteacher of Abergavenny’s Llanfoist Fawr Primary School, explains how the NACE Challenge Development Programme has helped the school achieve improved outcomes for more able learners, while nurturing skills for lifelong learning and success.
School leaders constantly wade through the latest wave of educational initiatives flooding the market. Through carefully considering, selecting and undertaking the NACE Challenge journey, we were provided with the support, structure, knowledge, skills and resources to challenge our more able to become effective learners in all areas – be it academic, sporting, artistic, cultural, spiritual, musical or social.
The whole-school approach of the NACE Challenge Framework has allowed us to strategically plan for and implement effective provision for our more able. The carefully considered standards of the framework and accompanying NACE resources, including innovative webinars, have provided our school with an invaluable structure to develop purposeful, bespoke learning. This has without doubt helped to enhance the life chances of many of our more able learners, allowing us to equip them with the skills needed to succeed in life.
Establishing the foundations for success
The NACE Challenge Framework provides a structure to develop strategy and provision for more able learners, whilst at the same time allowing scope for individual and creative approaches. At Llanfoist Fawr, we have used the framework to holistically develop whole-school policy and provision, as well as specifically focusing on character development.
Academic learning only takes place if the conditions are right and children can cope with the pressures and challenges of school and life beyond. Until young people know themselves, they do not really appreciate what they are capable of and how they can use and maximise their skills and talents. Learning qualities and values such as tenacity, resilience and courage impact positively on so many areas of development – promoting exciting, engaging and enriching experiences for all.
Undertaking the NACE journey has provided wonderful opportunities to develop character and to take pupils’ learning to exciting new heights. We have used the framework to identify individuals who show exceptional leadership skills, and develop strategies to enable them to realise their potential. Developing character traits for effective leadership has yielded some of the greatest impact in our provision. Who could fail to be impressed when watching Year 5 pupils leading and instructing the Duke of Cambridge in a challenging teamwork and thinking skills task during his visit last year to launch the SkillForce Prince William Award?
Evaluating impact and learner outcomes
To measure the impact of the NACE Challenge Framework we monitored and evaluated a wealth of performance indicators such as attendance, frequency of behaviour incidents, national test results and teacher assessment. All performance indicators reflected impressive measurable improvements. At the same time, as with many of the most effective influencers in education, the best and most important cannot have a number or a score attached to them.
Attainment in the core subjects at expected Level +1 (Outcome 6+ in Foundation Phase and Level 5+ in KS2) remains consistently high and shows our high aspirations for learners materialising into reality. Following a focus on developing the resilience and tenacity of our more able mathematicians, the performance measures for mathematical attainment have demonstrated a continuing journey of improved standards.
Our success in enhancing outcomes for more able learners can be directly attributed to our application of the NACE Challenge Framework. Staff have been trained, pupil ability nurtured, behaviours developed and provision shaped through our adoption of NACE’s holistic whole-school approach to challenge.
Most impressive has been the impact on more able learners’ perception of themselves, the happiness they gain through challenging learning, the self-belief and confidence that positively radiates from children who are challenged to give of their best and who are comfortable within their own skins.
The Challenge Framework has provided a pathway to reinforce and consolidate our high expectations across all areas of operation. We have high expectations of all our learners, and they in turn take great pleasure in emulating our expectations!
Find out how the NACE Challenge Development Programme could support your school.
Tags:
aspirations
character
confidence
enrichment
leadership
school improvement
Wales
wellbeing
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|