Guidance, ideas and examples to support schools in developing their curriculum, pedagogy, enrichment and support for more able learners, within a whole-school context of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes ideas to support curriculum development, and practical examples, resources and ideas to try in the classroom. Popular topics include: curriculum development, enrichment, independent learning, questioning, oracy, resilience, aspirations, assessment, feedback, metacognition, and critical thinking.
Top tags:
pedagogy
questioning
enrichment
research
oracy
independent learning
curriculum
free resources
KS3
aspirations
cognitive challenge
KS4
assessment
language
literacy
feedback
metacognition
resilience
collaboration
critical thinking
maths
confidence
English
creativity
wellbeing
lockdown
vocabulary
access
mindset
problem-solving
 
|
Posted By Jennifer Richards,
21 July 2017
Updated: 23 December 2020
|
Jennifer Richards is headteacher and headteacher consultant at St Mark’s CE Primary, Aquinas Trust. She outlines the school’s approach to “life without levels” and preparing learners to achieve greater depth.
“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.” – Albert Einstein
With the future of education uncertain and the landscape forever changing, it is vital that we continue to aim high and hold high aspirations for all our children. The emphasis on more able, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, is quite rightly a priority for us all.
It is our purpose to create the very best education system, using research and pedagogical principles, which will improve the life chances of our children. This will enable them to cope with the demands of the higher level of knowledge, skills and understanding required of them.
Seeking opportunities for deeper learning
The emphasis on preparing our children to achieve greater depth has been a major focus. After one year of “life without levels”, we now have an idea of how we can provide more opportunities and targets for those who can achieve this greater depth. We have focused on our more able in many ways, looking for opportunities within the curriculum to help them remain engaged and enthusiastic, whilst being able to demonstrate the depth of knowledge and skills they have acquired.
There has been a focus on greater-depth writing for all, maths mastery, and developing the reasoning skills of our more able, particularly girls who lack confidence in their own ability. We have not forgotten within this the more able across the curriculum, including PE and philosophy.
Developing expertise across our teaching team
We appointed a more able leader to plan, deliver and monitor the thoughts and achievements of our more able children, working alongside our middle leaders and teachers to identify barriers and gaps and how we can overcome them together.
This has fed into our CPD, which also involves our support staff, so that everyone is clear on the expectations we hold and how to support the children’s learning. We are also part of Aquinas Multi-Academy Trust; a network of more able leads in each academy works together to positively influence teaching and learning across the trust.
We have focused on the use of questioning and the techniques we use in philosophy for children to enable an enquiry-based and analytical approach to learning. Teachers plan their questions and the opportunities they provide in lessons for the children to ask questions.
Working towards the NACE Challenge Award, a framework to map out the best way to support our more able, has provided clarity and structure. Alongside research and best practice in other schools, we are able to plan and implement proven strategies, which will enhance the learning of all our children.
This blog post is based on an article first published in the summer 2017 edition of the NACE Insight newsletter. To view past editions of Insight, log in as a NACE member.
Tags:
assessment
CPD
questioning
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Keren Gunn,
11 July 2017
Updated: 22 December 2020
|
Keren Gunn, senior assistant principal for teaching school and staff development at Sir Christopher Hatton Academy, explores the challenges and opportunities of the new top GCSE grade.
Sir Christopher Hatton Academy is an outstanding (Ofsted 2015) mixed comprehensive, the lead sponsor in the Hatton Academies Trust, a teaching school and lead of the Hatton Teaching School Alliance. It achieved its second accreditation with the NACE Challenge Award in 2015, and is working towards its third.
As we review and renew our practice for all learners, I have been reflecting on what the change to the new 9-1 GCSEs means. What will a grade 9 look like; what are the qualities of “grade 9-ness”? How will we teach it effectively, and will we recognise it when we see it?
We know that according to Ofqual and the DfE, about 20% of the number of students achieving grade 7 or above will achieve a grade 9, and this means about 2.9% of students who would have got an A* would be getting a grade 9 this time round.
Opportunities and challenges across the curriculum
We see the new grade 9 as a real opportunity, as well as a challenge. From speaking to middle leaders across the academy, the challenges and the opportunities sound remarkably similar across the subjects. The grade 9 system provides huge opportunities for stretching and challenging students, and could allow for real progression and mastery within the curriculum. There are significant opportunities to exploit creative links with business, industry and higher education, for example in food technology or computing and beyond.
Examples of the innovation taking place include the use of authentic materials in MFL to ensure the language is of a sufficiently high register; adaptation of teaching methods and materials previously used at A-level; and a significant awareness of the need to explicitly teach higher-level thinking skills. The changes also offer an exciting opportunity to re-shape our Key Stage 3 curriculum to develop learners earlier on.
And the challenges? First, the lack of quality exemplar materials from exam boards to guide on the difference between a grade 8 and 9 – particularly significant in subjects like English where we have long been used to a subjective mark scheme, but equally so in mathematics and science, where there are new uncertainties in how questions are likely to be worded. There is also the challenge of delivering additional knowledge-based requirements, while ensuring the skills needed for sophisticated evaluation and analysis are fully developed.
Developing “grade 9” qualities and skills
The very quality of being a grade 9 learner is to be independent, enquiring, analytical, critical – and teachers need to be given the best tools, materials and CPD to ensure they can meet these students’ needs.
One area I have been working on in my own English teaching is the enhancement of targeted academic writing skills, to develop the quality of expression and lexical choices required at grade 9, as well as building contextual and cultural capital as students explore texts. I’ve also used open investigative approaches to poetry, encouraging learners to explore both creative and analytical responses, as well as more formal analysis. After initial work on the Ted Hughes poem “Bayonet Charge”, one student’s response in a first-person piece of creative writing read:
“As the bullets rained down on us the mud caught my feet and held me there as I stumbled frantically. That tear in my eye was not of bravery or patriotism, but of shock and pain. How could our country do that to us? Why would it push us to pain and anguish? I couldn’t comprehend.”
She had been given time to explore themes, concepts, attitudes and values, enabling her to form independent ideas about the poem, which she will then be able to translate into more formal academic analysis.
In realising that the message is about challenge for all, we can maximise the opportunity presented by the new GCSEs and embrace the vision of excellence for all students.
This blog post is based on an article first published in the summer 2017 edition of the NACE Insight newsletter, available for all NACE member schools. To view all past editions of Insight, log in as a member.
Tags:
assessment
critical thinking
curriculum
GCSE
KS4
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Tom Hills,
19 June 2017
Updated: 07 August 2019
|
Ynysowen Community Primary School is a successful primary school in Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales. The school is a Digital Pioneer School for the Welsh government and is a self-improving school. Ynysowen achieved its second NACE Challenge Award accreditation in May 2017.
Tom Hills, deputy headteacher and additional learning needs coordinator, gives an overview of the substantial work the school has done in the area of marking and feedback.
For a long time now schools have known that the feedback students receive is a vital component in moving learning forward. Some, like John Hattie, go as far as to say that it is the single most powerful modification we can make with regards to improving achievement, while the Education Endowment Foundation cites an average gain of up to eight months progress.
Couple this with the fact that marking features at or near the top of every survey conducted into teacher workload, and there are potentially huge benefits to all involved – if we get it right. And if we get it right, then we can lift the lid and remove some of the traditional glass ceilings that are in place in education, particularly for MAT learners.
“Non-negotiables” for marking and feedback
Based on this, we took the decision to review our already established good practice at Ynysowen Community Primary School. This led to us forming the following requirements as the basis for all subsequent work in this area.
We insisted that marking and feedback must:
- Be highly valued by the pupils;
- Be informative in terms of next steps;
- Impact upon pupil progress;
- Be highly valued by the staff;
- Be manageable;
- Put the onus on learners taking ownership and responsibility for their improvement and progress.
In order to achieve this, we set out the following non-negotiables.
- Every time a member of staff puts pen to paper to mark, learners will respond.
- When marking a body of text, marking will signpost learners to errors to correct via a coded marking system. (Code placed in the margin on the line where the error occurred.)
- When providing feedback by comment it will, where possible, contain an element of self-regulation, as this develops greater skills in self-evaluation or confidence to engage further on a task. Where this isn't appropriate, comments will focus on the process used in the task, or on the content of the completed work.
- Dedicated Improvement and Response Time (DIRT) must be used at the start of every lesson.
Impact and ongoing developments
The new coded marking was implemented in conjunction with DIRT and immediately had the desired impact of increasing pupil engagement with marking, and substantially reducing teacher workload. Within two weeks, staff reported learners beginning to use the coded mark system without prompting to self-assess and improve their work – before their teacher could mark it.
Over time, training was given to staff with regards to moving from task- and product-related comments to process and self-regulation. Initial baseline book review showed 65% of comments across KS2 were task- and product-related, 30% were related to process and only 5% self-regulation. After training, this moved to a much more balanced 40%, 35% and 25% respectively. Work is ongoing to further improve this swing.
When asked about marking and feedback, learners respond very positively. They talk with confidence about the purpose of marking and articulate clearly how it helps them move on in their learning; they love DIRT time. All teachers report a huge reduction in marking time.
This project has been the catalyst for more evidence-based reviews of practice. We have undertaken substantial work with regards to questioning and are currently taking some tentative steps in beginning to explore the area of metacognition for our older learners. Marking and feedback will be reviewed next year to look at how best to incorporate the features available in Google for Education (previously Google Apps for Education) – something the school uses extensively.
Making use of Google for Education
Google for Education offers facilities, the likes of which have never been readily available to schools in such a user-friendly way. Learners can use the apps to share their work and allow comments, so peers can suggest changes and leave feedback. This, however, need not be limited to within the classroom or even school – opening up all sorts of possibilities for school-to-school working across the world.
Then there’s Google Forms, which provides a different dimension to peer- and self-assessment. Theoretically learners could create their own form asking for feedback on specific things in their work and invite responses from people across the world.
Google Classroom makes collating learners’ work easy and quick and allows teachers to make and/or grade work and send it back to the pupil who can make alterations and re-submit. With the huge range of extensions and apps available in the Google Marketplace, this feedback could now take the form of saved audio clips – something that will make feedback even more detailed and accurate, with no time cost.
For those who prefer to use a pen to mark, there are now apps that allow the use of a stylus to physically mark pupils’ digital work. This is then converted to a .pdf and stored alongside the original work.
Given that Google for Education is continually updating and adding new features, the feedback functionality stands to get better and better, which can only be a good thing!
Tags:
assessment
feedback
independent learning
marking
progression
technology
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Anna Wynd,
19 April 2017
Updated: 22 December 2020
|
Anna Wynd, head of modern foreign languages at North Oxfordshire Academy (NOA), explains how the school approaches language learning through a “menu of challenge”.
In our approach to modern foreign language teaching and learning at North Oxfordshire Academy, we strive to nurture and encourage our pupils’ enthusiasm and curiosity, offering a varied menu of challenge.
Interactive games such as the “horse race” allow pupils to work in differentiated teams to solve tasks that will move their horse closer to the finish line, while allowing opportunities for self- and peer-assessment. Our KS3 homework involves a variety of interests, skills and pupil choice at different levels, such as recipes in the target language.
Preparing for the unexpected
The current MFL Programme of Study details the importance of pupils having the opportunity to read literary texts in the language (such as stories, songs, poems and letters) to stimulate ideas, develop creative expression and expand understanding of the language and culture.
NOA’s MFL library, which includes books, DVDs and magazines, allows the MFL department to continue to support the Academy’s drive on literacy by encouraging reading for pleasure in the target language and an exploration of intercultural understanding.
In addition, the films act as an effective and enjoyable way of developing pupils’ listening skills, particularly in training them to deal with “the unexpected element” of languages – a skill required for outstanding achievement according to Ofsted. Furthermore, the longer texts have been challenging yet purposeful, and act as a great stretch for our most able language learners.
A varied menu of challenge
We also include the following in our menu of challenge for language teaching and learning:
- A bank of authentic resources which are planned into schemes of work (maps, brochures, receipts, magazines).
- A whole-school approach to Assessment for Learning (AfL): “Find the gap, teach the gap.” Every student has a knowledge organiser for every subject, and uses them to revise the vocabulary and grammar that is studied in each lesson for the memory platform test. Every lesson begins with a memory platform that assesses prior learning. Pupils then self-assess in green pen. The main aim for this is to improve memory recall.
- Using sixth-form students to support Year 11 in small study groups to go through exam skills. The Year 11 cohort enjoy hearing from a peer about how they dealt with the exam, revision and stress.
- French Club, attended by able language learners in Year 8. Activities include board games in the target language; discussion of festivals and traditions in more detail, and comparison with the UK or with the home country of the students who attend; pupil-created quizzes either on cultural facts or what they’re currently learning; listening to French songs and talking about art and artists.
This case study was originally published in the Spring 2017 edition of NACE’s Insight newsletter. To view past editions, log in as a member.
Tags:
assessment
enrichment
KS3
KS4
languages
mentoring
vocabulary
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|