 
|
Posted By Tracy Goodyear,
15 December 2020
|
NACE Associate Tracy Goodyear, BA (Hons), FCCT
The title of NACE’s recent research report, Making space for able learners – Cognitive challenge: principles into practice, is very apt indeed – the age-old question remains: do we truly make enough space in our schools for all of our learners to flourish or not? But what does it really mean to ‘make space’ to allow the highest levels of cognitive challenge in our classrooms?
For me, ‘making space’ is about ensuring that schools have the tools and expertise to allow all pupils to thrive beyond the restrictions of examination rubrics or mark schemes; for too long, these have been limiting factors in the education of our young people and in the planning and execution of a truly effective curriculum.
Our real challenge is to work hard to remove the barriers and ceilings where learning has been hemmed in and to allow flexibility of thought and dexterity of expression. That task isn’t easy, given the various accountability measures that feel at times as though they work in opposition to this. It’s imperative that we create and sustain school climates where intellectual curiosity beats the rationing of difficult or challenging work (Mary Myatt put this brilliantly at ResearchEdBrum when she said ‘you don’t give difficult work to get great results, the great results follow the difficult work’).
This NACE report gives school leaders at all levels an accessible toolkit for putting some principles of cognitive challenge into practice in their classrooms. It acts as a ‘one-stop-shop' for neat summaries of key educational research and gives models for how this has been implemented in different settings. The four areas of focus – cognitive challenge, rich and extended talk, design of challenging learning opportunities, and curriculum organisation and design – highlight the interconnectedness of these factors in a successful education. Each section usefully includes graphics that highlight aspects of key research and there is also a useful summary at the end of each chapter. What’s useful about the write-up is that it considers how schools could/do go wrong in their implementation of some of these models and effectively warns against common ‘traps’ when trying to make improvements.
This report is an ideal text to dip into when instigating school improvement or when considering reviewing current practice. It is a useful compendium of educational research – Vygotsky's zones of proximal development rightly get a mention, as does the Fisher and Frey model and Rosenshine, alongside graphics of findings from NACE’s own research.
Perhaps most useful are the examples from NACE Challenge Award schools, which show some of the principles being applied in various contexts. Whilst these may not be for everyone, seeing how these elements have been applied in a range of ways is useful and may give ideas for practical implementation in your own settings. At the back of the book, there’s a list of the schools mentioned and it would be a mistake not to follow up and contact those schools if you felt there was more to be learned about a specific focus. Likewise, readers could extend some of these contacts through the NACE Research and Development Hubs.
As useful as this text is, the action by school leaders following the reading of this report is what will have the greatest impact. We know there is still so much more to do to address the gaps in research in this area, and schools can certainly contribute to building a more coherent picture by supporting the ongoing research work that NACE is undertaking.
I would recommend the following actions for school leaders who are considering using this research report as a springboard for school improvement:
- Find out where the need is first: will this work for your school, now? It’s no good introducing an initiative if it doesn’t solve a problem that you have (and that you can prove that you have!). NACE offers a series of useful self-evaluation frameworks if you are looking for a way to identify the needs of your pupils and staff (including the NACE Challenge Framework and Curriculum Audit Tool); these will support you in checking your assumptions and working on improving a real problem.
- Use a framework for implementation which will support the adaptations that are taking place. The EEF’s School’s Guide to Implementation is a great tool to support any level of school improvement and supports planning for long-term, sustainable change.
- Be ambitious for all learners and use the models highlighted in this report to support the implementation of positive change in your school. But use the models critically: there’s a necessity to adapt some of these to suit your purpose and school context.
- Find strength in the struggle! Whilst it may now feel like a time to pause developmental work in school, this is the time where this work and thinking will be most valuable. Educational sands are shifting rapidly as a result of Covid-19 and our educational landscape could look very different this time next year. Be proactive about what you’d like to see in your classrooms (face-to-face or online!) as we edge into very new and unfamiliar teaching territory.
In summary, this text works hard at bringing key cognitive research into focus and supports schools in filling in the missing gaps in research into improving outcomes for all pupils. It’s an essential guide for anybody working to improve the quality of teaching and learning in a school setting.
Find out more
NACE’s research publication “ Making space for able learners – Cognitive challenge: principles into practice” is available to preview online, with copies available to order for £12 (UK mailing) / £16 (outside UK). To explore the report findings in more depth, join our new three-part online course, Creating cognitively challenging classrooms – offering guidance and support to apply the research findings in your own context.
Additional reading:
Share your own review… Have you read a good book lately with relevance to provision for more able learners? Share it with the NACE community by submitting a review.
Tags:
book reviews
cognitive challenge
curriculum
leadership
research
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Chris Yapp,
09 November 2020
|
Dr Chris Yapp, NACE patron
The pressure for reform/replacement of the current GCSE and A-Levels has been growing for months, and the activity of the Rethinking Assessment group has got off to an impressive start in bringing a broad range of parties to the task. However, anyone who has ever been involved in education reform at any level, from school to HE/FE, will share stories of past disappointments.
The use of technology in schools, in my opinion, was constrained unhelpfully by the exam system’s limited view of assessment.
I remember a US Midwest school where the children made documentaries on projects. They wrote, produced, presented and organised the material in a variety of topics, including history and science. The skills the students had developed, along with confidence, was a joy to see. I used this as an example at a teaching conference in England. When I asked “Why not in England?”, the exam system was always given as the blocker. Employers have for years complained that young people are leaving education not work-ready. Yet the children in the example above clearly had teamworking, communication and project skills acquired through academic learning.
To avoid this opportunity to rethink assessment stalling, despite clear momentum, I think that we need to step back from the immediate challenge and look at some deeper questions.
- What is assessment for?
- Who is assessment for?
Without aligning the proposed reforms to clear answers to these questions, my concern is that we make some piecemeal changes which fail to grasp the opportunity to deliver a step change in the quality of education for all our children and teachers alike.
The difficulty is that these are not easy questions to answer. Education as a whole is a large and complex ecosystem with many stakeholders.
The answer to who includes the student, parents, employers, HE and FE, and must not forget teaching staff. When a child moves from primary to secondary school, what information about that child goes with them? What information would help the teachers in the new school best prepare for the new intake? What is the current gap and is it being addressed?
The answer to what includes a record of a learner’s achievement, motivating the learner, and guiding them on strengths and weaknesses. It can also be used to focus teacher development.
These are only partial answers. I believe that we need a dialogue beyond schools to address these in the wider interests of schools and their staff, students and the wider society and economy.
Of course we need to “do” something for the students of 2021 to give them hope and confidence. However, I think that it is important to realise that the solution for next year is at best a stop gap. This is likely to take a decade to build consensus and deliver a robust solution for the longer term. Sustaining momentum will be a challenge for us all. Failure to sustain has been a problem in previous reform efforts.
I remember attending a number of think tanks in the 1990s discussing what a 21st century assessment system would look like. What I find interesting is that the growing consensus now looks very like those discussions then. Richer data, learner focused, a balance between formative and summative assessment models were all desired then.
It is too easy to be cynical and put our heads down and assume that nothing will change. The pandemic has seen schools battle to keep education going and innovating in real-time. There have been many success stories.
Will this time be different? I think so.
There is a quote from, of all people, Lenin that some up my optimism:
“There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.”
Overconfidence in the exam system has, for me, stymied previous educational initiatives. The weeks over the summer with the exam problems will be difficult to contain.
We do need pragmatic steps, but these need to be within a development of a broader vision that can guide policy, research, professional development and curriculum development.
Some of you will no doubt ask whether we need to ask questions at a different level too?
- What is education for?
- Who is education for?
That is for another day, but possibly sooner than we may think today.
Read more:
Tags:
aspirations
assessment
campaigns
feedback
leadership
transition
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Sue Riley,
22 October 2020
|
Sue Riley, NACE CEO
Many of you will have seen the open letter to the Sunday Times from the recently formed Rethinking Assessment group. Born from issues raised this summer, Rethinking Assessment is a broad coalition of state and independent schools, universities, academics, employers and other stakeholders, which aims to value the strengths of every child. At its heart lies four fundamental principles:
- Many young people find the way our exam system works increasingly stressful and not a true reflection of what they are good at.
- Many employers complain that exams do not provide them with good enough clues as to who they are employing.
- Many headteachers feel that high-stakes exams distort priorities and stop them from providing a well-rounded education for their pupils.
- Many who are passionate about social mobility believe that any system that dooms a third to fail is a system with little sense of social justice.
We want to add our members’ voice and our research to this debate. There are immediate questions to be answered and longer-term opportunities to recalibrate the assessment system so that all learners have their full range of strengths recognised. As a membership organisation we can share and build on the decisions school leaders are taking now and over time provide perspectives that will inform longer-term changes.
Assessment is of course an integral part of learning and teaching. It facilitates daily ongoing review of individual progress and impacts on planning and target-setting. It supports personal learning targets. But we must not let the tail wag the dog. Not everything needs to be assessed, or indeed can be assessed, or needs to be independently assessed. We must consider too the timing of assessment – even more pressing as schools focus on tier 2 rota planning.
Whilst a decision over summer exams has been made in principle, “fall-back” detail remains unclear and learners are picking up on this, increasingly questioning the reasoning behind assignments, and the part they will play in assessment. All of this detracts from the richness of a subject.
The Early Career Framework and Teachers’ Standards have done much to support the teaching profession’s development in recent years. We must trust teachers with assessment, but teachers must be clear on what they are assessing and why.
What can we therefore now do in our schools to readdress this balance? One response lies in thinking about what we assess on a day-to-day basis in classrooms, how we build on low-stakes testing, and how we position effective challenge. How effectively do your teachers use retrieval practice for example? Deliberately recalling information forces us to pull knowledge “out” and examine what we know. The “struggle” or challenge to recall information improves memory and learning – by trying to recall information, we exercise or strengthen our memory, and we can also identify gaps in our learning.
NACE has recently undertaken a literature review of retrieval practice – looking at the theoretical framework and considering emergent related classroom practices and practical amendments and applications for more able learners. To access this review, click here.
Beyond the here and now of assessment, we need to return to the longer-term focus of the Rethinking Assessment coalition. Against the current backdrop, what could we do to improve the assessment system more broadly? How would we do it differently, allowing us to show non-traditional talents – making assessment more effective for employers, individuals and supporting the practising teacher? Fundamentally, how can we assess the child in front of us?
Contribute to the debate:
Read more:
Tags:
aspirations
assessment
campaigns
CEIAG
collaboration
leadership
lockdown
policy
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Rob Lightfoot,
13 October 2020
|
Rob Lightfoot, NACE Associate and R&D Hub Lead
How can you engage colleagues across your school to develop a whole-school approach for more able learners? This is a common question, and a critical issue to address: for provision to be effective, it needs to be embedded as part of whole-school policy and culture.
1. Make time, even during challenging times
There is no doubt we are living in unprecedented times, and time is in especially short supply for colleagues in schools. In normal circumstances, you would spend time finding your advocates and working with them to display the benefits of enhancing provision for your more able students. There is no doubt that when your provision is strong for more able students, then the achievement of all students improves too. In the end this is not creating additional work for staff; it will just mean doing things differently. Though it may be hard to make time to review what could be improved for the more able, ultimately this will be worthwhile and have a positive impact for a much wider group – as set out in the NACE core principles.
2. Involve your school leadership team
Lead teachers for more able students must understand they cannot make the necessary changes on their own. The SLT has to be a central part of the process. Some lead teachers will already be part of the SLT, others will not. It is critical that the provision for more able students is discussed at a senior level so necessary procedures can be put in place across all departments or year groups. Consistency is the key if you are to create the biggest impact for students in your school.
3. Start work behind the scenes
Every school is in a different place. If you have been given the role of lead teacher for more able students but the staff around you cannot consider any changes at present, then there is plenty you can do behind the scenes, starting with an audit of your school’s current provision. If you do have advocates in your school already, then you can give them the same access to the NACE resources that are available to you (read more here). As I said previously, an advocate within the SLT is crucial.
4. Share the benefits of your NACE membership
Finally, consider how you can share the benefits of NACE membership with colleagues. Engagement in the NACE R&D Hubs would be a great opportunity for other teachers in the school with a passion for providing the best possible outcomes for your more able learners. The webinars are also a great source for whole-school CPD. Please be aware that all these resources and opportunities are available for every member of staff in your school, not just the lead teacher or the SLT.
For additional guidance and ideas, take a look at our “getting started” guide.
Useful links:
Tags:
collaboration
curriculum
leadership
lockdown
myths and misconceptions
policy
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Elaine Ricks-Neal,
11 November 2019
|
NACE Challenge Award Adviser Elaine Ricks-Neal reviews emerging trends from the first round of Ofsted reports under the new education inspection framework (EIF).
There’s certainly a very different feel to the new Ofsted reports. Whilst they are clearly written with parents in mind – reflected in the use of accessible terminology and avoidance of too much detail in the published reports – there is no doubt that schools’ curriculum design and delivery is under forensic scrutiny. And although there is little explicit reference to more able learners, the importance of high-quality provision for this group is implicit in the strong focus on curriculum planning, subject-level provision, and breadth and depth of learning.
Style and structure of the new reports
The reports are written in a surprisingly simple style which Ofsted has said is intended to be parent-friendly, getting right to the point and largely steering clear of education jargon – for example, “The school is not a results factory.”
Both section 8 and section 5 reports look very similar, each opening with a short paragraph addressing the question “What is it like to attend this school?” – summing up the school ethos, behaviour, attendance and day-to-day opportunities. In most cases, the report’s opening statements are positive, but any issue linked with behaviour or low standards will be simply – even bluntly – highlighted; for example, “Pupils enjoy school, but they should be doing much better.”
The reports then move on to the main section: “What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?” – bundling together judgements for the quality of education, personal development, and leadership and management. This can make it quite hard to tease out the reasons for any difference in section 5 judgements of any of these strands.
Finally, there is a paragraph on safeguarding, followed by improvement points.
What key themes are emerging?
· Focus on curriculum design and subject plans
The reports may have a simple style, but it’s clear that curriculum plans and schemes of work have really been unpicked to check how well “subject leaders plan the curriculum so that pupils build on their knowledge so that they know and remember more”. If your curriculum is not coherent and well thought-through, there is no hiding place. Not surprisingly, a very frequent weakness is that subject planning is not “precisely planned and sequenced.” In primary schools this is often in foundation subjects. There is also real drilling down into phonics, the reading curriculum, mathematics and the quality of SEND provision.
If standards are referred to, which is not the case in all reports, it is usually a simple broad comment – for example, “pupils achieve well” – and linked back to how well subjects are planned and taught. This doesn’t mean results are not deemed important, and schools which have dropped a grade will usually have a critical comment about standards, but the emphasis is on the impact of curriculum and the way it is planned and taught in bringing about those outcomes.
· Warnings against curriculum narrowing
In secondary schools, there is the same focus on sequential planning, but also criticism of any perceived curriculum narrowing or lack of entitlement, especially for SEND and disadvantaged pupils. Also under scrutiny are the two-year KS3, low EBacc uptake and sixth-formers who are not accessing work experience. This may be unsettling for many secondary schools who might feel they will now need a curriculum rethink to avoid Ofsted disapproval.
In primary schools, if pupils miss lessons for intervention sessions, a judgement may be made as to whether they are missing out too much on the full curriculum.
What about more able learners?
There is no doubt that breadth and depth of learning is highly valued in this framework and that must be good news for more able learners. Though there is not much explicit reference to able learners, there is a strong focus on how well plans build on what learners already know, and where schools do less well, there is typically a reference to work being “too easy for some” or lack of challenge.
A good deal of attention is also paid to the depth of teachers’ subject knowledge and the need for learners to have access to “demanding” reading texts. Schools which do very well are complimented for adapting lesson plans well, having an “ambitious curriculum”, or learning being sequenced to develop “deep understanding” with teachers “building on what pupils already know to achieve the highest standards” (examples from an outstanding school judgement).
So, the focus on more able learners is there, though not as we saw it before due to the new “general audience” style of the reports. It is clear that inspectors are digging much deeper than the brevity of the reports might suggest, with a strong focus on the substance and quality of the curriculum and the day-to-day experience. This should ultimately benefit all learners, including the most able.
Tags:
curriculum
leadership
Ofsted
parents and carers
policy
school improvement
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Mark Campion HMI,
17 October 2019
|
Click here to read in English.
Nid yw mynd i’r afael â materion sy’n effeithio ar blant a phobl ifanc, fel bwlio, gordewdra a thlodi, yn hawdd i athrawon. Yn yr ysgol, profiadau bob dydd disgyblion sy’n cael yr effaith fwyaf – p’un a ydynt yn gadarnhaol neu’n negyddol – ar eu hiechyd a’u llesiant. Mewn adroddiad newydd, mae Estyn yn amlygu pwysigrwydd rhoi negeseuon cadarnhaol yn gyson ar draws pob agwedd ar fywyd ysgol.
Mae llesiant disgyblion bob amser wedi bod yn faes sy’n ganolog i’n harolygiadau. Ac, wrth i ysgolion ddatblygu’u meysydd dysgu a phrofiad yn barod ar gyfer y cwricwlwm newydd, bydd y ffocws ar lesiant yn gryfach fyth. Mae’r cwricwlwm newydd yn cydnabod bod iechyd a llesiant corfforol, meddyliol ac emosiynol da yn sylfaen i ddysgu llwyddiannus.
Mae ein hadroddiad yn dwyn ynghyd wybodaeth o amrywiaeth o ffynonellau gwahanol, gan olygu bod ambell ran enbyd ynghylch profiadau disgyblion eu hunain, gan gynnwys ysmygu, yfed ac iechyd rhyw.
Darganfuom fod negeseuon am iechyd a llesiant mewn gwersi, gwasanaethau ac mewn polisïau yn yr ysgolion gorau yn gyson â phrofiad bob dydd disgyblion.
Lle i gymdeithasu, diwylliant anogol, cyfleoedd pleserus i fod yn weithgar yn gorfforol, gofal bugeiliol amserol a gwaith cadarnhaol gyda rhieni, dyma rai o’r dulliau sydd, o’u cyfuno, yn cynorthwyo disgyblion i fod yn unigolion iach a hyderus, yn barod i fyw bywyd boddhaus.
Mae diwylliant anogol, lle y mae perthnasoedd cadarnhaol yn galluogi disgyblion i ffynnu, yn hanfodol i gryfhau iechyd a llesiant pobl ifanc. Ni ddylid tanamcangyfrif y pethau bach y mae athrawon da yn eu gwneud, fel gwenu a chyfarch disgyblion yn ôl enw ar ddechrau’r diwrnod neu wers unigol. Maent yn helpu disgyblion i deimlo’u bod yn cael eu gwerthfawrogi ac yn annog meddylfryd cadarnhaol.
Ystyriwch p’un a yw dull eich ysgol yn gyson ar draws bob agwedd ar ei gwaith. A oes gan yr ysgol:
- Bolisïau ac arferion sy’n sicrhau bod disgyblion yn gwneud cynnydd da yn eu dysgu?
- Arweinwyr sy’n ‘gwneud y dweud’ ynghylch cefnogi iechyd a llesiant disgyblion?
- Diwylliant anogol, lle y mae perthnasoedd cadarnhaol yn galluogi disgyblion i ffynnu?
- Cymuned ac ethos cynhwysol?
- Gwybodaeth fanwl am iechyd a llesiant disgyblion sy’n dylanwadu ar bolisïau a chamau gweithredu?
- Amgylchedd a chyfleusterau sy’n hybu iechyd a llesiant da, fel lle i chwarae, cymdeithasu ac ymlacio amser egwyl?
- Cwricwlwm eang a chytbwys, sy’n cynnwys profiadau dysgu unigol, yn seiliedig ar dystiolaeth, sy’n hybu iechyd a llesiant?
- Gofal bugeiliol cefnogol ac ymyriadau targedig i ddisgyblion sydd angen cymorth ychwanegol?
- Cysylltiadau effeithiol ag asiantaethau allanol?
- Partneriaethau agos â rhieni a gofalwyr?
- Dysgu proffesiynol parhaus i’r holl staff, sy’n eu galluogi i gefnogi iechyd a llesiant disgyblion?
Mae arfer dda’n cael ei hamlygu drwy astudiaethau achos yn yr adroddiad. Mewn ysgolion uwchradd, yn benodol, nid yw profiad bob dydd disgyblion o iechyd a llesiant bob amser yn cyfateb i nodau sy’n cael eu datgan gan arweinwyr ysgol. Ond, fe wnaeth Ysgol Uwchradd y Dwyrain yng Nghaerdydd wella arweinyddiaeth yr ysgol yn llwyddiannus a chafodd hyn effaith gadarnhaol amlwg ar y diwylliant a’r gefnogaeth ar gyfer llesiant disgyblion. Mae ei diwylliant yn cydnabod bod pobl ifanc o hyd yn datblygu’n gorfforol, yn feddyliol ac yn emosiynol a bod gan athrawon gyfrifoldeb i fynd i’r afael ag anghenion datblygiadol y plentyn cyfan. Hefyd, mae’r ysgol yn nodi mai o ddealltwriaeth athro o’r ffordd y mae pobl ifanc yn dysgu y mae arbenigedd yr athro yn deillio, yn hytrach na dim ond ei wybodaeth bynciol.
Yn Ysgol Gynradd Gilwern, Sir Fynwy, mae ei hymagwedd at gefnogi disgyblion agored i niwed wedi helpu staff i ddeall yn well y rhesymau sydd wrth wraidd diffyg hunan-barch neu ymddygiad annymunol.
Mae iechyd a lles yn nodwedd bwysig o gyflawni pedwar diben y cwricwlwm newydd mewn ysgolion. Mae gan ysgolion gyfle nawr, yn fwy nag erioed, i gynnig buddion gydol oes i blant a phobl ifanc yng Nghymru.
Mae’r adroddiad llawn ar gael ar estyn.llyw.cymru ac mae’n argymell ffyrdd y gall ysgolion, awdurdodau lleol, consortia rhanbarthol, darparwyr addysg gychwynnol athrawon a’r llywodraeth wella iechyd a llesiant disgyblion. Gall athrawon ac arweinwyr ddefnyddio astudiaethau achos yr adroddiad i ysbrydoli newidiadau yn eu hysgolion eu hunain.
Tags:
Estyn
leadership
policy
research
resilience
Wales
wellbeing
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Mark Campion HMI,
17 October 2019
|
Cliciwch yma i ddarllen yn y Gymraeg.
Estyn’s Mark Campion HMI shares key findings from the inspectorate’s recent report “Healthy and happy – school impact on pupils’ health and wellbeing”.
Tackling issues that affect children and young people, such as bullying, obesity and poverty isn’t easy for teachers. In school, it is the everyday experiences of pupils that have the greatest impact – positive or negative – on their health and wellbeing. In a new report, Estyn highlights the importance of giving consistently positive messages across all aspects of school life. Here, the inspectorate explores what it takes to help pupils be healthy and happy.
Pupils’ wellbeing has always been an area at the heart of our inspections. And as schools develop their areas of learning experience in readiness for the new curriculum, the focus on wellbeing will be even stronger. The new curriculum recognises that good physical, mental and emotional health and wellbeing underpins successful learning.
Our report brings together insights from a range of different sources, making for stark reading in parts about pupils’ own experiences including smoking, drinking and sexual health.
We found that in the best schools, messages about health and wellbeing in lessons, assemblies and in policies are consistent with pupils’ everyday experience.
Space to socialise, a nurturing culture, enjoyable opportunities to be physically active, timely pastoral care and positive work with parents are just some of the approaches that collectively support pupils to be healthy, confident individuals, ready to lead fulfilling lives.
A nurturing culture, where positive relationships enable pupils to thrive is essential to strengthen young people’s health and wellbeing. The little things that good teachers do like smiling and greeting pupils by name at the start of the day or an individual lesson should not be underestimated. They help pupils feel valued and encourage a positive mindset.
Consider whether the approach of your school is consistent across all aspects of its work. Does the school have:
- Policies and practices that ensure pupils make good progress in their learning?
- Leaders who ‘walk the talk’ about supporting pupils’ health and wellbeing?
- A nurturing culture, where positive relationships allow pupils to thrive?
- An inclusive community and ethos?
- Detailed knowledge about pupils’ health and wellbeing that influence policies and actions?
- An environment and facilities that promote good health and wellbeing, such as space to play, socialise and relax at break times?
- A broad and balanced curriculum that includes discrete, evidence-based learning experiences that promote health and wellbeing?
- Supportive pastoral care and targeted interventions for pupils that need additional support?
- Effective links with external agencies?
- Close partnerships with parents and carers?
- Continuing professional learning for all staff that enables them to support pupils’ health and wellbeing?
Inspiring good practice is highlighted through case studies in the report. In secondary schools, in particular, pupils’ day-to-day experience of health and wellbeing does not always match school leaders’ stated aims. But Eastern High School in Cardiff successfully improved the leadership of the school which had a notably positive effect on the culture and support for pupils’ wellbeing. Their culture recognises that young people are still developing physically, mentally and emotionally and that teachers have a responsibility to address the developmental needs of the whole child. The school also identifies that a teacher’s expertise lies in their understanding of how young people learn rather than simply their subject knowledge.
At Gilwern Primary School, Monmouthshire (a longstanding NACE member), the school’s approach to supporting vulnerable pupils has helped staff to better understand the reasons behind poor self-esteem or undesirable behaviour.
Health and wellbeing is an important feature in achieving the four purposes of the new curriculum in schools. Schools have the opportunity now more than ever to provide lifelong benefits to the children and young people in Wales.
The full report is available at estyn.gov.wales and recommends ways that schools, local authorities, regional consortia, initial teacher education providers and government can improve pupils’ health and wellbeing. Teachers and leaders can use the report’s case studies to inspire changes in their own schools.
Tags:
Estyn
leadership
policy
research
resilience
Wales
wellbeing
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Jon Murphy,
16 May 2019
Updated: 09 September 2020
|
Jon Murphy, Executive Headteacher of Llanfoist Fawr and Llanvihangel Crucorney Primary Schools, explains why he’s optimistic about the new freedoms presented by the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022.
While observing an inspiring Year 5 lesson as part of an assessment for the NACE Challenge Award, my eye was drawn to a statement above the whiteboard: “Who says the sky’s the limit when there are footsteps on the moon?” Push beyond our thin and fragile atmosphere, escape the boundaries created by gravity and a whole new exciting world of exploration, discovery and possibility emerges. Those words have remained with me and have become a guiding principle in my work with more able and talented (MAT) children.
The national curriculum defines parameters within which to operate, bringing both benefits and limitations. Key phases create their own “gravity” which can hold teachers and learners within fixed boundaries. Over-prescribed curriculum content stifles creativity, exploration and discovery, particularly for those with an independent spirit and capability. Boundaries create barriers to learning.
However, with the new Curriculum for Wales, we are being provided with the wonderful opportunity to change the way we teach our young people. We are on the verge of the introduction of a totally different approach, which promises the removal of boundaries, resulting in the creation of exciting educational discoveries that will challenge the way we think, the way we teach and the way we prepare our young people for the future. The significant change needed for curriculum reform will challenge us as professionals and by the same token will allow us the freedom to transform the way we challenge our more able learners.
The story so far…
30 April 2019 saw the publication of the draft Curriculum for Wales 2022. Within the Federation of Llanfoist Fawr and Llanvihangel Primary Schools, preparation for curriculum reform started long before the publication of the draft orders. Professor Graham Donald’s Successful Futures report, the catalyst which led to curriculum reform, provided the starting point for our own journey of curriculum transformation. We followed its progression through to the white paper, Our National Mission: A Transformational Curriculum, which gave us sight of the legislative proposals for Curriculum Wales 2022.
Although the details of the new Curriculum for Wales have only recently become available to all schools in draft form, carefully considered strategic planning has provided us with a head start in our preparations for implementation. Fundamental to the new curriculum are the Four Purposes which guide educational priorities and underpin teaching and learning to ensure learners become:
- Ambitious, capable learners who are ready to learn throughout their lives;
- Enterprising, creative contributors who are ready to play a full part in life and work;
- Ethical, informed citizens who are ready to be citizens of Wales and the world;
- Healthy, confident individuals who are ready to lead fulfilling lives as valued members of society.
Already the Four Purposes are a regular and natural part of the everyday new curriculum vocabulary used by pupils and staff. The purposes chime so well with the aspirations we have always held for our more able learners. We have created a vision and aims that are aligned to the purposes of the new curriculum, and although early days, we are already striving to ensure our vision ultimately comes to fruition through the introduction of new pedagogical approaches. We have moved away from the traditional subject coordinator role and allocated staff to the six Areas of Learning and Experience (AoLE) – expressive arts; health and wellbeing; humanities; literacy, languages and communication; mathematics and numeracy; science and technology – creating curriculum teams which bring together colleagues’ existing skills, knowledge and expertise.
Preparing for change: the role of the PLL
Although not a Pioneer School involved in the initial shaping of the curriculum, we have worked closely with our Pioneer colleagues to keep abreast of innovation and change. Pivotal to our work with Pioneer Schools has been the internal appointment of a Professional Learning Lead (PLL) – an initiative introduced by the South East Wales Consortium (EAS). Due to the significant changes in pedagogical approach needed to deliver the new Curriculum for Wales, it is essential to appoint a PLL with extensive skills, knowledge and experience in child development to ensure the curriculum is designed to meet the needs of every individual pupil, regardless of ability.
In addition to success as a subject leader across a number of areas, our own PLL has extensive experience as an Additional Learning Needs Coordinator and is also our More Able and Talented Coordinator. A key role for the PLL is to oversee the development of the 12 Pedagogical Principles across the six AoLEs, which are at the heart of curriculum reform. Currently our PLL is developing staff knowledge and understanding of the “what matters” concepts in each AoLE – headline statements that outline and organise learning. The “what matters” statements make connections to the Four Purposes to ensure learners acquire the appropriate knowledge, skills and experiences in each AoLE.
An operational starting point for staff has been involvement in the redesign of our planning templates to address the elements of the new curriculum framework. We are now making our first attempts to pilot planning and curriculum design for delivery of the new AoLEs.
Ensuring consistency and coherence
Successful implementation of the new national curriculum will be dependent on the quality of professional development provided for staff, upskilling them in the pedagogical approaches needed for effective delivery. Our PLL attends curriculum reform professional development opportunities facilitated by Pioneer colleagues, the EAS and other providers. She acts as a conduit bringing back into school new developments and good practice to be shared in senior leadership, staff and governors’ meetings and through facilitating school professional development days.
As a school we are already finding that professional development gained through participation in the NACE Challenge Development Programme is complementing and enhancing our curriculum reform work. We are looking at change holistically, and as a result we are carefully aligning curriculum reform with other work streams, including our transition to the six elements of the revised NACE Challenge Framework and amendment of our self-evaluation processes to address Estyn’s five inspection areas. This strategic alignment of the different systems and processes we use in school is ensuring that they work together as a coherent whole.
The freedom to let learners fly
Within the draft orders for the new curriculum are details of the principles for progression. These guide the progression of learning within each of the six AoLEs; the outlined progression steps contain achievement outcomes which can be used to identify progression of what a pupil can do as they progress in their learning. Unlike the current curriculum, which almost ties learning into key phases demarked by outcomes and levels, the progression steps are a true continuum and allow children to progress more in line with their ability – without the boundaries which can suppress progress. For more able learners there are no false ceilings; they can fly.
Teachers will need to teach differently, developing new pedagogy, assessment processes and the confidence to “let go of the reins”. Young people will have a greater say in what and how they learn. Enrichment and experiences which are an integral part of the new curriculum will allow learners to have a greater voice in how they design, guide, investigate and lead their own learning: a tantalising thought for more able learners, who will be provided with even greater opportunities to spread their wings. Through the freedom intended in the new curriculum, Welsh Government is handing us the scissors with which to cut the apron strings.
Grounds for optimism
The new Curriculum for Wales will provide a continuum of learning; the restrictive key phases present in the current curriculum will no longer exist. Transition will become smoother but at the same time will require even greater partnership and tighter transition plans to ensure a successful and seamless move for pupils from primary to secondary schools. With a learning continuum, it follows that work, which has traditionally been seen as the domain of the secondary sector, will permeate its way more readily into primary practice, an exciting prospect for more able learners who will access increasingly challenging concepts earlier in their primary career.
There is a great deal of optimism in Wales surrounding the introduction of a new curriculum. Naturally, there are concerns about resourcing and the pace and extent of change. Overall, educational professionals realise that we are on the verge of a new educational system that is non-prescriptive, boundary-free and which offers the freedom to develop learning opportunities that are genuinely bespoke to meet the needs of all learners, preparing them for work and life. We all have a lot to gain from current educational reform, and none more so than more able and talented learners.
Tags:
aspirations
curriculum
leadership
policy
progression
school improvement
Wales
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Elizabeth Allen CBE,
11 March 2019
Updated: 06 August 2019
|
Nurturing student voice is essential – but the most successful schools move beyond this to develop true student leaders, argues NACE trustee Liz Allen CBE.
Good schools are justifiably proud of systems that encourage young people to voice their perceptions, raise issues that matter to them and discuss their learning. In these schools, learners talk with their teachers and with each other, make formal presentations to peers, act as ambassadors for their school. But questions remain. Are all learners active participants? Is every student heard? What impact do their voices have on the school’s vision, values, curriculum and pedagogy?
Great schools, I would argue, have moved on from learner voice to learner leadership, and there are many fine examples of this among both primary and secondary schools accredited with the NACE Challenge Award. Their greatness rests in students’ capacity to lead their own learning, to demonstrate commitment to each other’s achievement, and to impact on the school’s strategic development. No child is too young and no context is too difficult.
“Students highlight their need for frequent one-to-one academic conversations, that are focused on individual learning skills as well as subject-specific strategies for improvement.” – Understanding the Challenge of the Exceptionally Able Learner; research undertaken by the Independent/State Schools Partnership (ISSP)
Create a “learning together” ethos
Motivated and engaged learners are keen to take responsibility for their learning and achievement, demonstrating a thirst for knowledge and a desire to become experts. They develop an extensive, advanced vocabulary, enabling them to engage in sophisticated discourse and to reflect on and improve their own learning.
The imperative on teachers is to create a subject-specific learning climate in which all students, in their own time, can grow to high cognitive ability and advanced oracy, enabling them to engage in deep learning conversations. As John Hattie has written, “The aim is to make students active in the learning process, until they can seek out optimal ways to learn new material and ideas, seek resources to help them and set appropriate and more challenging goals for themselves.” (Hattie, Visible Learning, 2009)
Schools that have created a “learning together” ethos encourage discourse between learners in all spheres of the school’s life and have structures in place that promote opportunities for students’ leadership of learning. Peer mentoring in lessons, students as academic and personal mentors to younger students, as buddies with students in other schools, as teaching assistants working alongside their teachers in younger classes – these all give learners the opportunity to grow into empathetic, caring adults, as well as enhancing their personal cognitive abilities.
A road map for school transformation
If our primary purpose is to give every child the opportunity and support to grow into a fulfilled adult, then it becomes imperative to engage them in the educational debate. When learners are asked, “Who do you want to be when you leave school?” and “What do you need from your school to help you to become that person?”, their answers can become the beginning of a road map for school transformation.
It takes school leaders’ courage, time and effort to place learners at the heart of school improvement discourse. The outcomes are high achievement, an inclusive and caring community and bright prospects for learners.
This blog post is based on an article published in the spring 2019 edition of NACE Insight – our termly members’ newsletter. To view past editions of Insight, log in to our members’ site.
Tags:
collaboration
leadership
mentoring
school improvement
student voice
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
|
Posted By Ann McCarthy,
04 December 2018
Updated: 23 December 2020
|
How effective is your use of school data? Ahead of her upcoming workshop “Using data to inform learning and secure high achievement”, NACE associate Dr Ann McCarthy shares guidance on the use of historic outcomes to target improvement in outcomes for all learners, including the more able.
This area is led by headteachers and senior leadership teams who set strategy, policy, school improvement plans and quality assurance arrangements. Senior leaders also develop middle leaders so they too can contribute to school priorities, extending the vision and policy into their areas of responsibility.
Based on effective school review and self-evaluation, school leaders highlight areas for development and improvement. They set targets which include the quality and range of school provision, progress and achievement of more and exceptionally able learners. They introduce new initiatives and practices with measurable outcomes, and promote action research to enable them to explore and implement the most effective strategies and practice.
It is important to set quantitative targets so the impact of actions can be measured objectively. This information can then be supplemented by qualitative measures of performance. Learners’ attainment and achievement targets are used to ensure all, including the most able, make appropriate progress across year groups and over time.
Six steps to implement in your school
- Put in place an action plan in response to self-evaluation and research evidence, which includes performance measures.
- Set whole-school end of key stage targets, using national benchmarks, which can be measured.
- Use the same or higher targets for interim school years.
- Set quantitative performance data targets, with attention to closing gaps in achievement between different year groups and subjects.
- Include targets for defined groups of learners including: gender; ethnicity; EAL; SEND and disadvantage.
- Identify other schools where performance is better in target areas and seek to work in collaboration or acquire support, dependent on needs.
In general, leaders would expect to see a small variation in the performance profile between year groups. This allows leaders to target marginal improvement year on year using existing data. However, where there is a significant variation in the prior performance of any given year group, these targets should be adjusted to reflect the differences.
Reviewing outcomes for more able learners
The following questions, regarding more able learners, should be considered:
- Are historic attainment outcomes in line with or better than average for similar schools or family of schools?
- What actions will lead to higher attainment and what quality assurance milestones can be put in place?
- Do more able learners make the same or better progress than other learners, relative to their starting points, and is this true regardless of learner groups?
- Have targets been put in place for all year groups and for all subjects?
- Are there any subjects or year groups where progress and attainment measures lie below whole-school targets and what specific action is in place to monitor and measure improvement?
- Have the targets been communicated effectively to middle leaders and have they acted to make changes which will lead to further improvements?
- When reflecting on the school’s position in relation to more able learners, there is a balance between where the school has been historically and what might be achieved if all barriers were removed.
This article is an excerpt from the NACE Essentials guide "Using data to improve provision for more able learners". To access this guide and the full NACE Essentials range, log in as a member.
Tags:
leadership
policy
school improvement
self-evaluation
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|