Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Register
Leadership and governance
Blog Home All Blogs
Collection of blog posts for and by school leaders, to support the development and maintenance of a whole-school culture of cognitively challenging learning for all. Includes examples of effective school improvement initiatives, guidance for those in a range of leadership roles, updates on the latest national policy and education research, and inspiring thought leadership pieces from across the NACE network.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: school improvement  leadership  policy  curriculum  aspirations  CPD  Wales  collaboration  disadvantage  research  assessment  CEIAG  lockdown  underachievement  access  resilience  wellbeing  Challenge Framework  Challenge Award  enrichment  parents and carers  myths and misconceptions  Ofsted  self-evaluation  student voice  transition  campaigns  character  Estyn  higher education 

NACE Challenge Award accreditation in a pandemic: what it means to our school

Posted By Ann Dwulit, 08 July 2021
In July 2021 St Luke’s CE Primary School in Islington, London, attained the NACE Challenge Award for the first time. Executive Headteacher Ann Dwulit explains why the school continued to work towards this accreditation throughout the trials and tribulations of the past 18 months, and what attaining the Award means for the school.

St Luke's has been working with the NACE Challenge Development Programme since early 2019. We decided to pursue the Challenge Award accreditation because there was a lack of consistency in children achieving greater depth at the end of KS2. The NACE process helped us to get to the root causes and develop and implement an action plan to address these – even throughout the pandemic. 

Our NACE consultant worked alongside us, even during lockdown, and this support was invaluable. Together we identified that children and the staff team gained valuable skills through home learning, such as independence and improved IT skills. Like many schools, we now have a lot more devices available for children to flexibly use in the classroom. We realised that some children's education did not suffer as much as we thought it would during lockdowns. Some children caught up faster than others too. 

It was the improved independence that we saw amongst more able children, as well as others who had/have the capacity to be more able, that we hooked onto when the children returned to school each time from the lockdowns. We had to fill the gaps in children's knowledge, understanding and skills, so the staff team agreed to pitch learning higher and to be more enquiry-led so that more able children could fly, enabling us to do catch-up interventions and work with those who needed it. The NACE process also enabled us to develop the role of subject leaders to a deeper and broader level as we un-picked how to catch-up learning in different subjects. 

The NACE Challenge programme – the Challenge Framework, the website, the resources, the lesson observation format, doing the case studies, and following through on our action plan – kept us focused and support was always there from our consultant. It was a whole-school commitment.

No school has stood still in the last 18 months and our setting a higher bar has had an impact upon all learners. More able children are now leading learning more, being great role models even within their individual bubbles, and they are more able to articulate their views, their feelings and their aspirations to each other and to anyone who asks. Talented children and those who have the capacity to be talented have opportunities to develop their talents. We use existing staff to facilitate this; we are not paying for additional specialist teachers and tutors to come in, we are just using the team we have more efficiently. In many respects, Covid has made us stronger, more resilient and more determined to ensure every child really does achieve their potential. 

By the time the NACE final accreditation came around, working differently was well embedded as we had achieved the goals we set out to achieve since 2019 – one of which was to improve reading across the school. We have also raised the profile of subjects that had been more dormant during lockdown and we know we need to see through curriculum development. Our end of KS2 teacher assessment showed a marked improvement in scores for more able children and even though this does not count as statutory testing, it counts to the children and it counts to us. This is something we will strive to maintain. I do not think this would have happened without our NACE consultant and without us going through the process of working towards the Challenge Award. Even if we had not achieved the Award this time round, I would still have said the process was worth doing and would just have re-applied to achieve the Award itself. 

Hearing that we had achieved the Award and had gained this external verification means the world to the team. Being told this by our consultant who we all know has really high expectations of us and for us – that what we are doing is working – means so much. The process will go on as we have our reviews, and all of this sits well alongside the Ofsted framework. Our work is never finished in schools, but it helps to know that what we have set up is working and is having a positive impact on outcomes for children and making a difference to their lives.

Read more:
 

Tags:  Challenge Award  Challenge Framework  independent learning  lockdown  remote learning  resilience  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Lessons from lockdown: key challenges in supporting the needs of able learners

Posted By Tony Breslin, 07 December 2020
Tony Breslin outlines three of the key headlines emerging from his new book, Lessons from Lockdown: The Educational Legacy of COVID-19, and explores the implications for able children and those working with them.

Headline writers, media pundits, parents and politicians may not agree on many things but on one aspect of lockdown they are united: the closure of schools is the lockdown strategy of last resort. Notwithstanding the growth in home schooling, evidence of a new relationship between the home and the school, and a new embrace for online pedagogies, few in education would disagree. However, the assumptions that underpin this unity need to be unpicked, and the experience of learners explored, if we are to learn some of the most important lessons of lockdown.

Based on conversations with over one hundred pupils, parents and professionals in special, primary and secondary schools, my new book, Lessons from Lockdown: The Educational Legacy of COVID-19, is an attempt to capture these experiences, and the emergent reality is much more nuanced than the headlines suggest. In respect of supporting able students, I identify here three themes that I believe are especially pertinent and elaborate on these below.  

1. The need for curriculum catch-up varies enormously within and between schools, and between individual students.


Behind the widespread panic about school closures – whether that be close to total, as was experienced in the spring and summer or ‘bubble by bubble’ as it has been since September – lies the assumption that children have been ‘missing out’ and missing out, in particular, on curriculum content. This fear of missing out – and the consequent need to ‘catch-up’ – sits at the heart of many media headlines and politicians’ pronouncements. There can be no doubt that some children have missed out enormously, and that the socio-economically disadvantaged and those living in challenging domestic circumstances have suffered most. Nor can it be denied that those in examination cohorts have had to navigate their courses through a choppy and much varied landscape, and here the variability of experience is the critical issue. Since the stuttering re-openings of first June and then September, no two schools in the same locality have had the same route from lockdown. But claims of a universal educational Armageddon are wide of the mark. In this mix, and in almost every setting, some young people have prospered: the children who have blossomed as a result of the previously scarce family time afforded to them, those who have valued the freedom of home-learning, those who have enjoyed pushing on through an examination specification at their own speed and have consequently gained ground. In this regard the re-introduction to school of these ‘lockdown-thrivers’, as I identify them in Lessons From Lockdown, is not without its challenges, especially when the ‘disaffected-able’ form a part of this cohort. 

Against this background, the smartest ‘catch-up’ strategies have started with diagnosis of need, not its presumption, and proceeded to offer highly personalised support that is particular to the learner, the group and the bubble. This, of course, is strongest when it is informed by exactly the methodologies modelled by those working either with the most able or those facing particular learning challenges.

2. The social purpose of schooling has been underlined as never before.


Whatever the challenges of curriculum ‘catch-up’, what might be termed social catch-up is far more complex. But, if this challenge is not addressed, it will feed through into reduced wellbeing and lower educational attainment. The reason for this is straightforward: inclusion is not the poor relation of attainment; rather, and especially for those young people at either end of ability and motivational ranges, it is the pre-requisite for educational success, howsoever measured. Provided that we have the resources (a pretty big ‘provided’), we have the skills and the knowledge, especially within networks such as that provided by the NACE community, to advise on and deliver curriculum catch-up: booster classes, revision modules, targeted interventions, personal study plans and so on. Not so, social catch-up: how do you address the gaps left by virtually a year without play dates for the seven-year-old, or by several months of those evenings and weekends usually spent with friends, often not really doing anything, as a teenager? 

In short, whatever the educational purpose of schools, their social (not to mention the socio-economic) purpose has been underlined by the pandemic, and with it the vital contribution that this makes to the development of the young. It may be time to give far more status to the social purpose of schools and to appraise their success against a much broader scorecard. At risk of repetition, wellbeing is not a nicety to be considered after good grades have been assured; it is the foundation block on which achievement rests.

3. The challenge lies not in getting back to where we were, but to deciding where we want (and need) to go.


Towards the close of our focus group and interview-based discussions, I posed one key question: what can’t you wait to get back to, and what can’t you wait to leave behind? Highly structured systems (or ‘total institutions’ as Erving Goffman termed them over fifty years ago) tend to reproduce themselves over time and are remarkably resilient of change. The military, hospitals, prisons, our public service bureaucracies and, of course, schools, are such institutions. Their tendency is to maximise the feeling of change while minimising its impact. How else might we explain why generations of educational reform have delivered a curriculum that still mirrors that offered in the post-war schools of three-quarters of a century ago? Why else might we have overseen the building of a swathe of new schools at the turn of this century constructed on the exact template of their predecessors? Highly structured organisations such as schools (and there is no doubting the need for such structure) usually change only as the result of a profound system shock. The pandemic has provided just such a shock; so, the question is straightforward, even if the answer is far from simple: where do we want and need to go from here, and how are we going to get there? 

Schooling will be different after all of this. As a profession, and as a community of interest – one particularly committed to identifying, supporting and unlocking potential in able children – we need to ensure that we work with colleagues, and their specific communities of interest, to shape the schooling of the future. If we don’t, it will surely be done for us, and to us (again).

A teacher by profession, and a former Chief Examiner and Local Authority Adviser, Dr Tony Breslin is Director at Breslin Public Policy Limited and a Trustee of Adoption UK. He works extensively in the spheres of curriculum development, citizenship education, school governance and lifelong learning. His new book, Lessons from Lockdown: The Educational Legacy of COVID-19, is published by Routledge and available to pre-order now. A 20% discount is available for NACE members on this and all purchases from Routledge (log in for details of all current member offers). 

Read more:

Tags:  curriculum  disadvantage  lockdown  policy  remote learning  wellbeing 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Wellbeing: a whole-school priority

Posted By Jon Murphy, 12 May 2020
Updated: 11 May 2020

As UNICEF reports that 700 million days of education could be lost this academic year in the UK, Jon Murphy, NACE Associate and recently retired headteacher of Llanfoist Fawr and Llavihangel Primary Schools Federation, reflects on the need to focus on social and emotional wellbeing as schools prepare to return, and asks if the focus on health and wellbeing in the new Curriculum for Wales could be helpful to all schools.

Over a shockingly short timescale we have become all too familiar with a vocabulary that was most certainly not part of our daily conversation only a few months ago. “Lockdown”, “social isolation” and “social distancing” have become common parlance regardless of age, occupation or the part of the world in which we live. The coronavirus has undeniably changed the world as we know it. As we learn to live with the consequences of COVID-19 and the “new normal”, and as we start to contemplate a return to school, we will be teaching children to use and apply these new concepts to ensure the continuing safety of all. Like no other period in history, we will be sharply focusing our work to ensure the health and wellbeing of children and young people is secure. Not an easy task when children are naturally gregarious and demonstrative, and when their basic instinct is to be tactile with their peers, particularly the youngest of our charges.

Backed by support and resources from schools, commendable efforts have been made to home educate children. Anecdotally we know there has been considerable variance in the provision made, and there has been a very definite re-affirmation that there are few substitutes for a classroom staffed by qualified professionals. As children return to school, they will be at very different stages in their readiness to learn.

Backed by support and resources from schools, commendable efforts have been made to home educate children. We know there has been considerable variance in the provision made, and there has been a very definite re-affirmation that there are few substitutes for a classroom staffed by qualified professionals. The DfE last week published school case studies presenting a range of emerging practice. As children return to school, they will be at very different stages in their readiness to learn.

Layers of trauma and “the unseen monster”

Without doubt, young people will relish the social interaction of being with peers again. However, there will also be challenges after an unprecedented prolonged period spent out of school. For months many children have been kept at home, told that this is a safe sanctuary and the world beyond is not. Children are incredibly perceptive. Some will have absorbed the stress and fear of their parents and carers, adding to their own insecurities. Some could be painfully aware of the financial impact the virus has had on family income, adding yet another layer of trauma.

When children are integrated back into society and school, many will be taking tentative steps filled with trepidation, re-entering a world which was for so long seen as a place of danger. As they leave their families for the first time, some will fear for their parents or carers, many of whom are employed on the frontline as key workers.

Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, renowned for his work on child development, simply but very profoundly stated: “children think differently to adults”. With this in mind, we should be aware of how children might perceive COVID-19 and what role we can play in school to mitigate any negative impact on their emotional wellbeing. More able learners may well be able to grasp and understand at an abstract level what the virus actually is. Meanwhile for learners still operating at a concrete level, particularly the very young, the virus is a mysterious thing that they can’t see, smell, taste or feel. It remains something that in their imagination can be conjured up in so many manifestations. Film directors of the horror genre are very aware that the unseen monster is far more terrifying than anything that is visible.

Preparing for a safe return to school

This week the DfE released plans for a phased reopening of schools in England from 1 June at the earliest. Meanwhile Welsh Government has launched the Stay Safe Stay Learning initiative, with Education Minister Kirsty Williams setting out five principles to guide thinking about a safe return to education. The first principle, quite rightly, is the health, safety and emotional wellbeing of children, young people and staff.

COVID-19 has dominated life all day every day for the past few months and we should be under no delusions about its long-term impact; as such we need to be prepared to plan long-term. Safeguarding the health, safety and emotional wellbeing of all in our school communities will be both an immediate and long-term priority; school doors will not open again without planning and preparation for what will be a carefully considered and measured transition back to school life.

Children’s experience of school life is going to be vastly different to what they were used to before school doors were forced to close so abruptly. When schools recommence, we will have to teach them a whole new set of sophisticated behaviours and values relating to social distancing and peer interaction. As stated by the Welsh Minister, physical, mental and emotional health is more important than anything at the moment – an area which had already been brought to the fore in the new Curriculum for Wales.

Bringing health and wellbeing education to the fore

Previous to the pandemic, schools in Wales had been charged with reimagining the educational offer for children and young people through development of the new curriculum. One of the six Areas of Learning and Experience (AoLEs) that will constitute the new orders is Health and Wellbeing, an area that will take centre stage when schools return. Welsh Government sees this AoLE as an area that “will help to foster a whole-school approach that enables health and well-being to permeate all aspects of school life”. The component parts of this AoLE – development of physical health, mental health, and emotional and social wellbeing – must be core to the education of all children on their return to school. Initial provision will need to focus on transition activities that support social and emotional literacy; we cannot even begin to teach the academic subjects until emotional wellbeing is secure.

Currently, alongside the task of teaching, education professionals in Wales are planning for the new curriculum and testing new ways of working for the future. It would seem prudent, considering the current health crisis, to bring their vision for the new curriculum into sharp focus now and to prioritise and even accelerate the development of the Health and Wellbeing AoLE. There is an urgent need to plan for a series of activities and experiences that rebuild children’s confidence and resilience in light of what has now become a part of their daily lives. We must teach them how to live with the pandemic and the part they must play to keep themselves and others safe. Now is the time to be innovative and to reimagine this element of the curriculum because now is the time that it is most needed.

Moving forward: a stronger, wiser generation

It is said that stopping the pandemic is “the most urgent shared endeavour of our times”, and one thing is for sure: when children return to school their health, safety and wellbeing is being placed in the capable of hands of a workforce that will help them learn to interact and exist in a changed world. Schools who made the investment of training staff in emotional literacy initiatives such as Thrive and ELSA will reap the benefits of being able to provide support for the most fragile of those returning to a world that can now seem especially frightening and uncertain. We can take heart in knowing that most learners are innately resilient and will adapt with few problems as schools evolve. We have the tools with the Wellbeing AoLE to be able plan and offer the best provision for keeping all in school safe. The principles and rationale behind the AoLE are sound and the present is the time we would benefit most from the best practice it advocates. As we help children to adapt to a different way of life, who knows, we may even nurture a generation of learners who will be inspired to go onto careers of caring for others or even to be the innovators that prevent such a crisis happening again.

The shadow cast by COVID-19 has forced children to grow up very quickly. It has already stolen a significant portion of their schooling, and we must not allow it to rob them of their precious childhood. As educationalists we are in the privileged position of guiding children as positively as we can through this unprecedented period of history, so they emerge stronger, wiser, safer and more conscious of health and wellbeing than any generation that has gone before.

Tags:  curriculum  lockdown  remote learning  resilience  Wales  wellbeing 

PermalinkComments (0)