Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Register
Professional development
Blog Home All Blogs
Included in NACE’s core principles is the belief that teachers are central to providing challenging and enriching education, and their professional development is paramount. This blog series explores effective approaches to teacher CPD at all career stages, with a focus on developing and sustaining high-quality provision for more able learners and cognitively challenging learning for all.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: CPD  research  collaboration  professional development  cognitive challenge  enquiry  leadership  school improvement  curriculum  networking  pedagogy  language  assessment  lockdown  neuroscience  oracy  partnerships  early career teachers  maths  mentoring  metacognition  myths and misconceptions  pyschology  technology  Wales  wellbeing  access  adolescence  aspirations  Challenge Award 

CEO’s update: thank you – and what’s next?

Posted By Rob Lightfoot, 08 July 2025

NACE CEO Rob Lightfoot reflects on key NACE initiatives over the past academic year, and looks ahead to our plans for 2025-26.

I’d like to start with a thank you: to all the member schools, NACE Associates and partner organisations who have contributed to our work this year. Our strength is in our network, and this has been particularly clear over the past year, with our membership and wider community working together to share and develop approaches to ensure every young person has access to cognitively challenging learning opportunities – helping to close the achievement gaps for all.

Subject-specific resources and CPD

One of the areas in which this collaborative approach has been most apparent and impactful is in our focus on collating subject-specific resources to support schools in implementing approaches to support cognitive challenge across each subject area.

Throughout the year, we’ve been adding to our subject-specific resource collections, with input from our member schools and a range of leading subject associations who have generously shared their expertise. Alongside this, we’ve worked with partners on a series of subject-specific webinars; if you missed any of the live sessions, the recordings are available for all members to watch back.

This work goes alongside our subject-specific online workshops, which we continue to run at both primary and secondary level.

More to come in 2025-26 – please contact us to share what’s working well in your own subject/department, or to suggest additional areas for us to focus on.

Research update

The third phase of our “making space for able learners” research initiative has focused on exploring how schools can best support more able learners who encounter disadvantage in any of its many forms. Thanks to all the schools which have contributed by sharing examples of what’s working in their own context, and to York St John University which is partnering with us on this project.

Key findings from this initiative were shared at our conference in June, alongside case studies from many of the contributing schools. Watch this space for details of the forthcoming publication, plus supporting materials and CPD opportunities.

NACE Challenge Development Programme

On the NACE Challenge Development Programme side, we’ve been pleased to welcome new schools to the programme whilst celebrating those attaining Challenge Award accreditation for the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth time. We were delighted to hold our first Challenge Award School Experience event outside of the UK earlier this term, at Horizon International School in Dubai, as well as celebrating the addition of Alfreton Nursery School to our growing network of NACE Challenge Ambassador Schools. 

You can explore all currently accredited schools on our Challenge Award schools map

If your school is interested in working with the NACE Challenge Framework, you can schedule a free 1-2-1 call to find out more. We also offer discounts for groups of schools working collectively on the programme.

What next?

We’re busy planning our CPD programme for next academic year, with several courses already open for booking. These include two exciting new collaborations:

  • The Working Classroom – a six-part course for those working at Key Stages 3 to 5, led by Matt Bromley and Andy Griffith, authors of The Working Classroom: How to make school work for working class students
  • Thinking Moves A-Z: Metacognition Made Simple – a four-part course for teachers across all phases, led by Roger Sutcliffe, creator of the Thinking Moves A-Z and a world leader in the field of Philosophy for Children.

We’re also running our popular “Leading on more able” one-day course again on 9th October. Plus, bookings are open for our autumn term member meetup, which will be held at the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education (CLPE) in London on 3rd October.

Check your school post-box ahead of the new term for your 2025-26 member mailing, including more updates on our plans for the year and ideas to get full value from your membership.

As always, please do get in touch with any feedback, questions or suggestions. From all of us here at NACE: have a great summer break! 

 

Tags:  Challenge Award  Challenge Framework  cognitive challenge  collaboration  CPD  leadership  networking  professional development  research 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

CEO’s update: NACE’s plans and priorities for 2024/25

Posted By Rob Lightfoot, 09 September 2024

NACE CEO Rob Lightfoot shares an update on opportunities for NACE members for the coming year – including our research focus for the year, the 2025 NACE Conference, the launch of our subject-specific resources, network groups, primary and secondary subject workshops and our continued cluster offers for both membership and the Challenge Development Programme.

As we enter the start of the new academic year, I wanted to take this opportunity to give you a brief overview of what we have planned to support you this year…

Research focus for 2024/25

As I am sure you will be aware already, this year we will be concentrating our efforts on researching how we can best support more able learners who encounter disadvantage in any of its many forms. Our research will demonstrate the successes of schools in enhancing the motivation, engagement, achievement, experience and education choices for more able learners who experience disadvantaged circumstances. Our aim is for this work to become a vehicle for professional development and school improvement.

We are holding an in-person research event on Friday 18th October at the NACE offices for anyone interested in being part of this project. Register here or contact research lead Dr Ann McCarthy on annmccarthy@nace.co.uk if you have any questions.

NACE Conference 2025 

The research outlined above will be the focus for our conference this year, taking place on Friday 27th June 2025 at Pangbourne College. Our early bird 2-for-1 will end soon – take advantage of this offer by signing up now.

Subject-specific resources

Following member feedback, we are delighted to be launching our new subject-specific resource collections – to support subject leaders and individual teachers in embedding cognitively challenging learning across the curriculum. We will continue to add to these collections throughout the year. If there is a particularly resource or strategy that you would like to share with our wider member network, then please get in touch with us via info@nace.co.uk.

Network Groups

We will continue to run our popular series of Network Groups for the new academic year. These groups offer the opportunity to connect and collaborate with peers and seek support for the issues you currently face. There are dedicated groups for More Able Leads (meeting half-termly), EYFS and KS5 (termly), as well as a free termly group exclusively for schools accredited with the NACE Challenge Award. All are facilitated by NACE’s senior education team.

Register now for the full year and you’ll get one session free. 

Subject workshops

Having received outstanding feedback since we started running our subject workshops in January 2023, we will continue to run these popular online sessions. 

You can sign up for our next set of primary workshops taking place on the morning of Thursday 21st November 2024, covering history, mathematics and reading. Our secondary workshops will take place on Thursday 30th January 2025 and will cover computing, English and mathematics. Multi-delegate discounts are available.

NACE offers for groups/clusters of schools

We will continue to offer discounts to clusters of schools for both membership and participation in NACE’s Challenge Development Programme. Working together will promote a consistency in approach, while allowing the flexibility for each school to work at their own pace and in line with their own context. Groups of schools working on the programme can also benefit from shared consultancy and/or CPD to support this process.

NACE Challenge Ambassador schools

We are delighted to welcome Holme Grange School and Nettlesworth Primary School as our more recent NACE Challenge Ambassador Schools – both attaining this status during the 2023/24 academic year – joining existing Ambassadors Toot Hill School, Southend High School for Boys and Ysgol Glan Gele. 

If you have already been accredited with the Challenge Award on two or more occasions, you will have the opportunity to apply to become a NACE Challenge Ambassador School during your next accreditation. To do this, you must meet the Ambassador School requirements, and we look forward to more schools joining this prestigious group in future years when their next accreditation is due. 

I wish you all the very best for the new academic year. As always, please do get in touch if we can support you in any way. 

Tags:  access  collaboration  CPD  disadvantage  networking  professional development  research  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Critical incident analysis in teaching: what, why, and how?

Posted By Rebecca Cartwright, 17 April 2023
Updated: 17 April 2023

Rebecca Cartwright, midway through her PGCE progamme in primary education with EXCEED Academy Trust, shares her experience of using critical incident analysis to develop her provision for more able learners, with additional input from NACE Associate Dr Jonathan Doherty.

As part of my School-Centred Initial Teacher Training (SCITT) provided through an apprenticeship route into teaching, I’ve had access to schools and experts involved in the EXCEED Academy Trust in Bradford. Schools regard inclusion as a high priority and it is a recurring feature in training days and embedded into all aspects of the SCITT curriculum. 

Through my experiences on the course and in the classroom, I’ve become particularly intrigued by inclusion and what it looks like for more able learners. I’ve seen more able learning promoted through higher-order questioning, adaptive teaching and teaching for creativity. This has been an area I’ve reflected upon during my own teaching practice, where I wondered about effective strategies, the superficiality of some techniques employed, and how they could be made more effective without increasing workload.

The PGCE programme, in conjunction with Leeds Trinity University and EXCEED Academy Trust, encourages student teachers to critically examine research and other evidence and reflect on their own professional practice in relation to a specific learning need faced by pupils in school. Master’s Level study in the PGCE programme comprises two assignments each contributing 30 credits; these are professionally focused and are taught by blog co-author Dr Jonathan Doherty. The assignments build upon the strong thread of reflection in teaching, drawing together observations in schools and understanding from taught sessions at the university and in-school CPD. 

Inclusion remains high on education policy agendas. Inclusive education is based on the belief that all members of society have the right to participate in and have access to education on an equal basis. Inclusion is a fundamental right for all learners – not just those who are deemed ‘vulnerable’ or those having special education needs. The module and first assignment, ‘Supporting Individual Needs’, is intended to develop thinking around this theme and challenge values to enable effective inclusive teaching that are culturally and individually responsive so that all children can succeed.

This assignment uses reflection and critical incident theory to support meeting a specific need for a child. Becoming an effective teacher involves considerably more than accumulating skills and strategies. It involves critical reflection. The more teachers explore, the more they discover (Larrivee, 2000). 

What is critical incident analysis, and why use it?

Critical incident analysis (CIA) is an approach to understanding and dealing with challenges in everyday professional practice. The term ‘critical incident’ refers to an event or situation which marks a significant turning point or change for someone. Incidents that teachers deal with in everyday teaching become critical through reflection and then analysis. An incident becomes a critical incident as a result of 1) reflecting about it; 2) thinking critically about it; and then 3) applying an analysis framework to it. Critical reflection has several benefits for teachers: it informs future practice and informs appropriate action in similar future situations. 

How does it work in practice?

A number of models exist to support critical reflection, but I used McAteer et al. (2010) to explore an incident with a more able pupil that occurred in my classroom. The incident related to a more able Year 2 pupil working at greater depth and a far higher level than his peers. The lesson was teaching to include emotions in diary writing in English. He displayed classic signs of a high ability learner by finishing set work easily and then appearing to disengage in the lesson. Individual follow-up activities for him did not engage him either and his behaviour began to quickly deteriorate. He started chatting and I observed a snowball effect, disrupting other children.

In my analysis of this short classroom episode and applying the CIA framework, my immediate thoughts were of frustration that I had not met the boy’s individual needs. Later, through deeper reflection, conversations with my teacher and class-based mentor and my knowledge of more able learning, I was able to explore other perspectives with regard to the incident and consider ways to provide appropriate challenge for this boy in future. 

This included looking again at teacher assessment frameworks for writing, to understand in more detail what targets and requirements were needed for greater depth learners; annotating planning with a next step for any child who had met the success criteria of the lesson, which I, or any support staff could access to further their learning. I investigated teaching for creativity and methods such as teaching children that it is acceptable to make mistakes, working backwards and looking at gaps in knowledge. I reflected on the importance of taking time to identify the pupil’s learning on his writing journey and looking at greater depth and potentially higher year frameworks to support his learning. 

NACE’s guidance on cognitive load theory (available to members here) affirmed some of my assumptions and suggested that more able learners may not need to spend as much time on retrieval practices. I will now allocate more time to providing opportunities for independent learning activities which are rich in cognitive challenge. Reading research has made me consider the impact of providing more able children with advanced content and making it accessible in different ways, enabling better engagement. 

The experience has taught me much about teaching and extended my knowledge of more able learners. Going forward I will be better informed to identify where children are on their individual learning journeys and so quickly gauge next steps. The experience has also made me realise where I myself am on my own learning journey. I am not the finished article but have many positive aspects of my practice which I need to continually reflect upon. There are many sources to draw on for information and specific reflection that will allow other aspects of my teaching to fall into place. By being proactive in learning, such honest critical reflection will support me to gauge the needs of the children to further their journeys.

References

  • Larrivee, B. (2000) Transforming Teaching Practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1:3, pp. 293-307
  • McAteer, M., Hallett F. & Murtagh, L. (2010) Achieving your Masters in Teaching and Learning. Exeter: Learning Matters. 
 

Tags:  cognitive challenge  CPD  early career teachers  pedagogy  professional development 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Putting CPD into practice: 4 achievable next steps

Posted By Elly Hayward, 15 November 2022

Elly Hayward, Head of English at Pangbourne College, shares her reflections on achievable next steps to start making changes following an inspiring CPD session.

Like many of those working in schools, I’ve found getting back to face-to-face CPD with professionals and colleagues is brilliant. After recently attending NACE’s member meetup on the theme “Speaking up: developing oracy for high achievement”, I came away buzzing with ideas, keen to feedback and also plot and plan as to how to drive forwards this key skill at Pangbourne College.  

But what’s the reality of actually doing that? How easy is it in our busy school lives to act upon and embed our newfound knowledge into our school culture? When’s a good time to broach a whole-school initiative and is that necessarily the first step?

Here are my musings on the matter and perhaps, even in the process of writing how I might go about this, I may find myself one step closer to realisation in my own school context.

1) Feedback to someone… anyone! 

I used a department meeting to consolidate my thoughts from the day and to pass on some of the excitement that I felt about what I’d seen and shared. I also reflected on a lot of the good things that we are already doing in our department (always good to big up your department with what they are already doing well!). As an English Department, we usually find ourselves at the forefront of anything to do with presentations, debates, talking in public. And we do it pretty well. But what I also realised whilst feeding the information back was that I was sure that good things were happening elsewhere in the school – and that’s, perhaps, where to start.

2) Find some time. 

I can hear your teacherly guffawing from here. Time is something we have precious little of and as not only a Head of Department but a working mum and wearer of many hats, I needed to be seriously realistic about where my priorities lie and what might actually be achievable. 

Without taking the lead on a whole-school development strategy in one fell swoop, I thought smaller. Microscopic in fact. I can hear my line manager’s words ringing in my ears already: “Don’t take on too much… We all need to strike that balance between trying to do everything and doing less, well.” I would do well to heed the latter. 

It’s not a question of whether improving students’ oracy skills will raise the attainment of all students; it was clear from the evidence presented at the NACE meetup that it will. Instead, the questions need to be: Does this align with whole-school strategies and development plans? What are the school’s priorities this academic year and next? What impact will this have in my context? And coming back to my first point, what are we already doing well?

3) Find out what’s already going on that’s good. 

This is my next step and the point where I find myself now. My plan – as Chloe Bateman suggested in her presentation at the meetup (summarised in this blog post) – is to find out what’s already good in my school. I have an awareness (you’d hope so!) of what is happening oracy-wise in the English Department but I’m acutely aware that it is not just the job of the English staff to develop and promote good oracy skills. My intention is to send a survey out to teachers asking them to firstly outline what oracy is, as I’m not sure many label it as such, and give concrete examples of where they develop this skill in their subject.

4) Start with small wins.

This is something that is key to our department philosophy and my approach to many things. Sharing what is already being done to promote good oracy by finding those nuggets and celebrating them with colleagues before introducing more ideas for staff to possibly adapt into their lessons. This may take the form of delivering a session of CPD or a presentation at one of our academic meetings or INSET, or it may be as simple as sending out a short video of “Have you tried…?” ideas. Chloe shared some great advice about “enhancing our existing curriculum, rather than distracting from it.” I will certainly also be following up with some of the other ideas shared at the meetup – but one step at a time!

Even in writing down my thought process, I feel fired up again. My eye-line has risen just above the mire of lessons, marking, administration and school events to look at that bigger picture about making a long-term, significant change to the way oracy is perceived in our school and, ultimately, raising our students’ confidence and skills in communication.

Elly Hayward is Head of English at Pangbourne College. You can follow her on Twitter @PangCollEnglish

Feeling inspired? Explore NACE CPD opportunities.

Tags:  collaboration  CPD  curriculum  language  leadership  motivation  networking  oracy  pedagogy  professional development  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Speaking up: developing oracy for high achievement

Posted By Jonathan Doherty, 15 November 2022

NACE Associate Dr Jonathan Doherty shares key takeaways from our recent NACE member meetup on this theme.

The recent NACE meetup in Didcot brought together member schools to explore the theme of oracy for high achievement. This ties in with NACE’s current research into the role of oracy within cognitively challenging learning. 

The context

Oracy is at the centre of good classroom practice, since it is through quality communication and the use of talk and language that thinking, knowledge and understanding are developed. There is increased awareness of the importance of high-quality oracy education and its significance across academic, professional, cognitive, social and emotional spheres. While the case for oracy is strong, schools are still coping with the impact of Covid-19 and lockdown. Many young people experience isolation, and the past few years of limited exposure to conversations, everyday interactions and in-person classroom exchanges, have deprived many of opportunities for rich talk and spoken language development. Vulnerable students and those from economically deprived backgrounds have been most affected and this has brought fresh urgency to the issue, as schools move on from the pandemic and seek to address current challenges of closing achievement gaps and taking oracy education to the next level.

Summary of the day

Ahead of the member meetup, colleagues were invited to submit oracy-based questions that would be explored during the course of the day. Examples of these were:

  • How can teachers implement effective strategies for oracy without dramatically increasing workload?
  • How can we best develop oracy for the most able in mixed ability classrooms?
  • What are interesting activities to help pupils improve their confidence when public speaking, among their peers and people they don't know?
  • What approaches are most effective in promoting oracy in group work so that it is productive and benefits all learners? 

I opened the day with an overview of the research context for oracy. Oracy is certainly not a new issue (with its beginnings going back to 1965), but despite its recognition since then, the status of oracy in the architecture of our education system does not fully reflect its value and importance to young people’s outcomes in school and life. We looked at the case for oracy with reference to research literature in language, education and neuroscience, before explaining how the needs of more able learners can be met through inclusive oracy education and cognitive challenge. 

Haili Hughes, Head of Education at IRIS Connect and Principal Lecturer at the University of Sunderland, took up the theme of oracy and confidence-building in her presentation. She developed this with reference to oracy and metacognition and mental schema and showed, as one example, how the approach of dialogic teaching promotes oracy and academic self-concept. Her explanation of knowledge and cultural capital was very interesting and relevant. 

Rebecca Earnshaw, CEO of leading oracy education charity Voice 21, shared her organisation’s commitment to providing a high-quality oracy education for every child and the vision to empower young people to use their voice for success. She made links to mental health, oracy being a process and a product of learning, and drew upon a range of research – including the Education Endowment Foundation findings that showed that students taking part in language interventions make five months additional progress over a year and this rises to six months for disadvantaged students – to further substantiate the importance of quality oracy education in schools. The audience was treated to several practical activities on ways to embed oracy in the curriculum. 

An important part of member meetups are the school case studies. The final speaker of the morning was Chloe Bateman, ECF Lead Facilitator and History, Religion and Philosophy Teacher at Maiden Erlegh School, who shared the story of how the school has established a whole-school culture of oracy. You can read Chloe’s summary here.

Following a networking lunch, where colleagues certainly put their speaking and listening skills to good use, the afternoon was given over to speed-sharing, the part of the day which provides an opportunity for colleagues to share their experiences and ideas with peers. These important discussions provided a knowledge exchange forum for classroom strategies to develop oracy that have been effective. Some examples of the brilliant ideas shared in the speed-sharing were:

  • Focus on language in discussions and how to build it up (Tina Stinson at Thornton College)
  • Explicit teaching of oracy benchmarks and ways to achieve them (Michelle Ginty and Viviana Young at Salusbury Primary School)
  • Frayer Model of teaching Tier 2 and 3 vocabulary (Olivia Cornwell at Central Foundation Girls’ School)
  • Displaying key terms for the lesson on the board, teaching their meaning explicitly using call-and-response to aid pronunciation, and directing students to use them during ‘turn and talk’ activities (Amy Lloyd at Haybridge High School)
  • Vocabulary Bullseye (Beckie New at BrookField School)

You can read more about the ideas shared on the day here.

Key takeaways from the day

  • Addressing the needs of more able learners can raise achievement for a much wider group of learners in a school by increasing challenge for all. Considering the needs of more able disadvantaged learners is crucial to ensuring an inclusive and fair curriculum. (See NACE core principles.)
  • There is strong research evidence for the importance of high-quality oracy education. This is supported by education, psychology, language studies and neuroscience research. The significant impact of oracy is across academic, personal and life outcomes.
  • Self-confidence through purposeful practice of discussions about current affairs and wider issues builds cultural capital and confidence. A focus on oracy helps students express their thoughts and feelings in a more structured and approachable manner that will also build academic self-concept.
  • Embedding oracy into school culture with deliberate and explicit teaching of speaking and listening supports student progress and achievement. Every school is different and it is essential to identify your school’s oracy needs. Providing for more able learners is about creating a curriculum which gives opportunities for all children to flourish. (See NACE core principles.)

Share your experience

We are seeking NACE member schools to share their experiences of effective oracy practices, including new initiatives and well-established practices.
You may feel that some of the examples in this blog are similar to practices in your own school, or you may have well-developed models of oracy teaching and learning that would be of interest to others. To share your experience, simply contact us, considering the following questions:

  • How can we implement effective oracy strategies without dramatically increasing teacher workload?
  • How can we best develop oracy for the most able in mixed ability classrooms?
  • What are interesting activities to help students improve their confidence when public speaking, among their peers and people they don't know?
  • What approaches are most effective in promoting oracy in group work so that it is productive and benefits all learners? 
  • How can we implicitly teach pupils to justify and expand their ideas and make clear opportunities to develop their understanding through talk and deepen their understanding?
  • How do we evidence challenge for oracy within lessons?

View the slides from the day:

Read more:

 

Tags:  CPD  curriculum  language  lockdown  networking  oracy  pedagogy  professional development  questioning  research 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

NACE membership: opportunities and updates for 2022-23

Posted By Rob Lightfoot, 20 September 2022
Updated: 08 September 2022

NACE CEO Rob Lightfoot shares an update on opportunities for NACE members this year – including new on-demand CPD, R&D Hubs, website updates, and reduced Challenge Development Programme costs.

Welcome to the new academic year! I am sure we are all looking forward to leaving school closures behind us, following the Covid pandemic, and being able to focus on the needs of our young people. Here’s an overview of what we have planned to support you and your school this year…

New on-demand CPD modules

Our set of new on-demand modules build on NACE’s research into cognitively challenging learning environments, exploring key aspects of cognitively challenging teaching and learning. Grounded in research, each module is brought to life with examples of cognitive challenge in practice – at the whole-school/leadership level, and within the individual classroom.

In a similar vein, we will soon be launching a set of on-demand modules for teaching assistants to understand the cognitive science behing challenge in the classroom. Again, this set of modules can be used to provide training across the academic year for all of the teaching assistants in your school.

R&D Hubs programme launch

Our Research and Development Hubs programme, free for our member schools, offers opportunities for NACE members to exchange effective practice, develop in-school research skills and collaborate on enquiry-based projects. This year, the Hubs are exploring three key themes: (1) oracy for high achievement; (2) rethinking assessment; (3) cognitive challenge within the new Curriculum for Wales. To learn more, please sign up for the online Hubs programme launch, which takes place on Tuesday 27 September at 3:30pm. 

Website updates

We are making changes to our website, in response to member feedback, to make it easier for you to sign up for events (such as this term’s member meetup) and find the resources you are seeking. These amendments will continue throughout the academic year, but we hope you will see an immediate improvement this term – starting with our new-look members’ area. Please do not hesitate to get in touch with additional feedback and suggestions.

Keeping costs low to support member schools

We are all facing increased costs but, to support our members, we are freezing our membership subscriptions at the same rates as for the 21/22 academic year. We are also extending the discounts available for MATs, alliances and clusters; see here for all fees and group discounts.

In addition, to mark NACE’s 40th anniversary, we are reducing the prices of NACE Challenge Development Programme packages for the whole of the 22/23 academic year. The NACE Challenge Development Programme is designed to support school leaders who are uncompromising in their ambition to ensure more able learners achieve their potential, in the context of challenge for all. 

Alongside this, we are reducing costs for schools working through the Challenge Development Programme who wish to apply for Challenge Award school accreditation – providing external validation of high-quality provision for more able learners. Again, these reductions will be in place for the whole of the 22/23 academic year.

NACE Challenge Ambassador programme launch

This month we are launching our NACE Challenge Ambassador Schools programme, which will be open to all schools that have achieved the NACE Challenge Award on two or more occasions. This initiative aims to create a strong network of schools, providing outstanding collaboration opportunities for similar-minded school leaders, and supporting continued improvements in provision for more able learners. The programme will also provide a collective voice to respond to government white papers and other high-priority issues at the national level.

Celebrating NACE’s 40th anniversary

As mentioned above, 2023 will be NACE’s 40th year working with schools, education leaders, practitioners and policy makers to improve provision for more able learners. Please keep an eye out for special events and initiatives later in the year to celebrate our 40th anniversary.

As always, please do get in touch if we can be of any help and I wish you all well for the new academic year.

 

Tags:  Challenge Award  Challenge Framework  cognitive challenge  collaboration  CPD  enquiry  networking  professional development  research  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

CEO’s update: a look ahead to 2022-23…

Posted By Rob Lightfoot, 12 July 2022

NACE CEO Rob Lightfoot outlines NACE’s core research themes for 2022-23, and opportunities to get involved next term.

It’s been a difficult time for everyone as we moved out of Covid restrictions this academic year. The spring term was one of the most challenging for schools since the start of the pandemic, and we can only hope that – after a well-deserved summer break! – we can now really begin to refocus our energies on planning to meet the needs of learners going forward.

NACE research themes for 2022-23

It is early days as we begin to unpick the impact of the last two years for learners and school staff alike, but we have chosen to focus our research next year on two areas:

1. Oracy for high achievement: this strand will explore whole-school oracy strategies in the context of cognitive challenge, in addition to effective oracy practices for high-achieving classrooms.

2. Rethinking assessment: this strand continues our investigation of effective assessment practices in the classroom, across all phases of teaching, including assessment through questioning, dialogic discourse and improved oracy.

Get involved…

If the themes above sound of interest, you can sign up to participate in the 2022-23 NACE R&D Hubs programme. This will comprise a Hub on the two themes above, along with a third Hub focusing on cognitive challenge within the new curriculum for Wales. To learn more, register for the online launch event, taking place on Tuesday 27 September. Sign up here

Registrations are also open for our first member meetup of the new academic year, “Speaking Up – Developing Oracy for High Achievement”, which will take place in Didcot on Tuesday 18 October. Sign up here.

And finally, next term will also see the launch of our new Challenge Award Ambassador Schools programme, which will be open to all schools who have been accredited with the NACE Challenge Award on two or more occasions. Further details coming soon!

I wish you all a relaxing and enjoyable summer break and I hope you get the chance to recharge your batteries ready for the new academic year.

 

Tags:  assessment  cognitive challenge  collaboration  CPD  enquiry  language  leadership  networking  oracy  professional development  research  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

NACE R&D Hubs 2021-22: end of year report

Posted By Ann McCarthy, 07 July 2022

Dr Ann McCarthy, NACE Research & Development Director

At NACE, research and development lies at the heart of our work. Using research findings from within and outside education, whether contemporary or historic, we have an evidence base on which to develop our understanding of cognitively challenging learning. Our publication “Making space for able learners: cognitive challenge - principles into practice” provided colleagues with practical guidance based on case studies from NACE member schools. The findings from this research, alongside the NACE Challenge Development Programme and associated resources, provide support for schools wishing to become outstanding providers. Our more recent activities have included work with schools in Wales on the new curriculum for Wales, as well as focusing on the development of early years provision, oracy, rethinking assessment and an increased understanding of metacognition and perfectionism. 

What are the NACE R&D Hubs?

An important facet of our evidence-based practice is the NACE Research and Development (R&D) Hubs programme. The R&D Hub approach to research and development is based on teacher enquiry. This is a core tool used by teachers to make informed choices and systematic decisions supported by evidence. It enables teachers to measure the impact of their actions and as a result make purposeful changes to curriculum and pedagogy. 

Each NACE R&D Hub brings together a community of like-minded practitioners who want to develop their own classroom practice and share this with others. Each Hub develops academic thinking relating to a specific theme and asks a “Big Question” about existing practice. 

This academic year our three Hubs explored the following themes: (1) the influence of pedagogy on curriculum, (2) perfectionism and (3) cognitively challenging learning within the new Curriculum for Wales. Hub leaders provided participants with guidance on some existing research and reading resources. Participants were then encouraged to examine their own classrooms and present examples of practice which might be refined, improved or changed. They were able to articulate outcomes they wanted to achieve and potential changes which they might make to cause this to happen. Working from a classroom-based hypothesis they then developed a question in the form “If I… will pupils…?”

Through teacher enquiry we have been able to help teachers to understand the complexity surrounding the development of cognitively challenging learning environments. They have examined practice which improves cognition and cognitive skills. They have increased learners’ understanding of themselves and what is needed to learn well. Through their actions to refine provision for highly able learners they have had a positive impact on all learners. Through the Hubs, participants have developed their academic voices, which has enabled them to share their ideas more widely within their schools, in the NACE community, and with their networks of schools.

Theme 1: Pedagogy and the curriculum

In this Hub, led by Copthorne Primary School (Bradford), participants examined ways in which a focus on aspects of pedagogy impacts on a cognitively challenging curriculum. This reflects NACE’s belief that by creating cognitively challenging learning environments and refining provision for more able pupils, pedagogy will improve, and all pupils will benefit. 

Aspects of pedagogy which teachers determined could be central to their enquiry interests included:

  • Higher-order questioning
  • Curriculum organisation 
  • Designing rich and extended talk opportunities
  • Developing pupils’ enquiry skills
  • Developing collaboration and language skills
  • Use of manipulatives and practical resources
  • Live modelling
  • Developing independence

Teachers took time to reflect on their current practice and discussed features of their work which they would like to develop. They posed questions in line with the enquiry model and then refined the questions to provide a precise focus on an area for refinement and analysis. All teachers found it useful to have the time and space to think more deeply about strategies to challenge the more able. They were able to share some great examples of analysis of the impact of their interventions.

Pupil engagement increased in most cases and teachers showed that they were more confident and better equipped to challenge the more able across the curriculum. Through engagement with this hub teachers built up a wider range of teaching strategies. They have evidence to show that these strategies work to deepen understanding. Examples of impact included the use of manipulatives in maths, retrieval practice for GCSE revision, live modelling, extended talk and opportunities to develop reasoning skills. 

Theme 2: Perfectionism

This Hub’s focus on perfectionism built on the work NACE has undertaken with York St John University in this field over the past few years. The original research examined the impact of raising awareness of perfectionism and helping young people to understand more about the associated traits. While that initial research focused on key stage 4 pupils, teachers in the Hub were able to use the information and resources developed to work with a wider age range. The question here was “Can a single classroom-based lesson improve student-reported knowledge about perfectionism and a willingness to seek support if needed?” The materials used to support the teachers’ enquiry projects are available for all schools here

Teachers engaged in the enquiry found that some pupils already understood what was meant by perfectionism but did not necessarily appreciate the different “flavours” of perfectionism. Pupils’ response to this information was strongly positive. Some reported that it helped them to reduce stress and worry as they prepared for examinations. Others recognised some aspects of perfectionism in themselves. They learnt about the difference between being a perfectionist (which could lead to negative outcomes) and wanting to do well (as a positive trait). 

Not all aspects of the enquiries were positive, as one target group was taken out of class, which caused them to worry about missing other activities. It was widely felt that raising awareness as a part of developing health and wellbeing for all is an important step forward in schools. One Hub participant commented that it would be useful to continue to explore the impact of the perceived expectations of others (e.g. parents, teachers, peers), and ways of creating a culture which emphasises doing one’s best rather than attaining a certain outcome.  

Schools need to consider the effects of pressures on pupils from their peers, their teachers and their parents and carers. How can an improved understanding of perfectionism become more widely shared within schools? How can school culture adapt to reflect this knowledge about perfectionism?

Theme 3: Cognitive challenge within the new Curriculum for Wales

Led by Bishopston Comprehensive School and Ysgol Gyfun Gwyr (Swansea), this Hub sought to develop cognitively challenging learning experiences within the new Welsh Curriculum. To do this each participant focused on a key aspect of self-regulation or metacognition within their teaching. They then examined the impact on the resilience and ambition of their pupils within their learning. This group selected a wide range of starting points in response to this question. 

One school was acutely aware of how highly context-bound resilience and metacognitive skills can be. They found that working with pupils on specific workload issues was more useful than additional revision. They also found peer support and advice could increase the effectiveness of working practices. Another participant also used peer collaboration to support some GCSE German students. This led to a greater understanding of explicit learning strategies and an improved linguistic range. Another school with older pupils tackled the issue of cognitive overload through the introduction of planning templates. The belief was that students have a negative attitude towards essay questions due to high content and cognitive overload. This affects their ability to achieve the highest marks, since they miss out key content when answering questions. During the enquiry period students’ marks improved, as did their attitudes to essay writing. They found that having “chunks” of information rather than one overwhelming larger piece of writing was easier to manage.

The use of explicit teaching and modelling by both the teacher and other pupils can impact on learning, as was evidenced above in GCSE classes. Another example of this was to introduce younger pupils to higher-order question types. When pupils understand what is possible, they can adapt their learning. In this school the intervention led to pupils setting themselves challenging questions which they sought to answer. They could reflect on the learning of others and guide them to improve responses. They took greater responsibility for their own learning and were more resilient. The quality of written responses have become more sophisticated, exhibiting a greater depth of knowledge. 

In total contrast to the teacher explaining and modelling learning, another participating school trialled the “silent way method” with Year 8 pupils. For this method to work, the teacher does not explain each step but remains silent to enable pupils to discuss and discover the learning processes themselves. This took place in a mathematics class where pupils were skilled in routine and algorithmic responses but were less resilient in solving problems. When pupils were asked to investigate and discover the steps needed to solve problems, they became more active in their learning and showed greater resilience when faced with new problems.

NACE R&D Hub participating schools 2021-22

Despite the pressures experienced by schools over the last year, we were delighted to have a diverse range of schools participating in R&D Hubs programme this year. These included: 

  • Bishopston Comprehensive School 
  • Brooklands Farm Primary School 
  • Chelmsford County High School
  • Christleton High School
  • Copthorne Primary School
  • Dylan Thomas School 
  • Furness Academy 
  • Hartland International School
  • Howell's School, Llandaff 
  • Hydesville Tower School
  • Kentmere Academy
  • Pentrehafod School
  • Laugharne Primary School
  • Llwynypia Primary School 
  • Lutterworth High School
  • Malvern St. James
  • Samuel Ryder Academy
  • St. Albans RC High School 
  • St. Cedd’s School
  • St. Thomas More Secondary School 
  • Storrs High School
  • The College, Merthyr Tydfill
  • The Cotswold School 
  • The Mulberry House School
  • Ysgol Caer Elen 
  • Ysgol Gyfun Gwyr
  • Ysgol Gyfun Gymraeg Bryn Tawe
  • Ysgol Llanhari

Congratulations to all of those who persevered and completed their projects. We look forward to working with many of you, alongside new participants, next year.

NACE R&D Hubs 2022-23: join us next year...

What aspect of your own practice would you like to examine? Would you like an engaged community of peers to discuss this with? If you have not yet joined a NACE R&D Hub, now is the time to consider this. We believe the experience of engaging in a teacher enquiry project is one of the most effective ways to examine and develop your own practice, while engaging with current research and sharing insights with others.

Whether or not you have engaged in teacher-enquiry projects or belonged to a Hub before we would be delighted to welcome you next year. The Hubs are open to all NACE members, and those with more experience in teacher enquiry will make all new participants welcome and support them as they use this approach to developing expertise. 

Theme 1: Oracy for high achievement. If you or a colleague are interested in developing oracy in the classroom or across the school, you will want to join NACE Associate Dr Jonathan Doherty and the team at Copthorne Primary School in Bradford to examine the use of language for high achievement. Jonathan is currently researching oracy for NACE and is well-positioned to support the team at this leading NACE school to inquire into this subject at classroom level.

Theme 2: Rethinking assessment. If you have been thinking about the ways you currently use assessment, its position within teaching and learning, its effectiveness and value, you may want to join the Hub looking at rethinking assessment. This Hub is supported by NACE’s central team and led by Dr Ann McCarthy, who is examining the ways in which we can make better use of assessment to develop cognition, cognitive skills and learners’ metacognition. In this Hub participants will have an opportunity to examine assessment as learning and its place in cognitively challenging learning environments. 

Theme 3: Cognitive challenge within the new Curriculum for Wales. The third Hub will be led by Alison Sykes and her team at Bishopston Comprehensive School. This provides an opportunity for those working in the Hub this year to continue their enquiries in this field, while also welcoming other schools wishing to examine cognitive challenge within the new Curriculum for Wales.

All three Hubs will open with an online launch event at 3.30-4.45pm on Tuesday 27 September 2022.

If you or a colleague would like to join a Hub or learn more about the programme, please visit the NACE R&D Hubs webpage for more information, and register here for the online launch event.  

Tags:  cognitive challenge  collaboration  CPD  curriculum  enquiry  leadership  metacognition  networking  pedagogy  professional development  research  school improvement  Wales 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

NACE research themes for 2022

Posted By Rob Lightfoot, 15 February 2022
Updated: 14 February 2022

NACE CEO Rob Lightfoot outlines our research themes for this year, including opportunities for member schools to get involved.

As the first half of the spring term draws to a close, we know many schools are still struggling with staff absence  but things are starting to improve for many, and we are all looking forward to planning ahead over the coming months. Here at NACE, we are particularly excited to be developing our two key research themes for the year: assessment and language.

Rethinking assessment

The focus of our next member meetup, at New College, Oxford on 23 March, will be “rethinking assessment”. Spaces are limited, so register now if you would like to join us.

Ahead of this event, NACE Research and Development Director Dr Ann McCarthy’s latest article explores the question: “How does a focus on metacognition impact on assessment practices in the classroom?” Many people still view assessment as an activity which is separate from the art of teaching – simply a list of checks and balances required by the education system to set targets, track learning, report to stakeholders and finally to issue qualifications. However, those who are using assessment routinely, and at all points within the act of teaching and learning, understand the true power of assessment. 

Read more:

Language in learning for high achievement

Our second research theme for this year is around the use of language in learning for high achievement. We are seeking to examine best practice in advanced comprehension, literacy and oracy, allied to high achievement, within our NACE member schools. We want to develop an understanding of the current backdrop to the development of comprehension, literacy and oracy skills in schools, including the effects of the pandemic on teachers and learners.

As part of this theme, we are keen to explore the key role of language across all subject areas – and this month we are focusing on the importance of language in mathematics. Having spent nearly 30 years teaching the secondary mathematics curriculum, I know the importance of language in this subject is too often overlooked. If we want to take our students on a pathway to being mathematical and thinking like mathematicians, we should build in language acquisition and precision reading at every stage of their learning.

Read more:

Get involved: share your school’s experience

The contributions of NACE member schools have been central to the first phase of our Making Space for Able Learners research initiative and will remain so as we develop the second phase of this project. 

If you are interested in learning more about or contributing to any aspect of our research work this year, please contact communications@nace.co.uk.

 

Tags:  assessment  cognitive challenge  CPD  language  maths  metacognition  professional development  research 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Teacher enquiry: what, why, and how

Posted By Jonathan Doherty, 11 February 2022

NACE Associate Dr Jonathan Doherty reflects on what we mean by teacher enquiry, its benefits, and how to do it well – drawing on the experience of the NACE R&D Hubs.

Colleagues at this stage in the year will be fully into the cycle of NACE Research and Development Hub meetings and working to finalise their enquiry projects for this year. It is a privilege to be part of the R&D Hub based at Copthorne Primary School in Bradford. The meetings are a rich exchange of ideas for teacher-led projects under the umbrella theme of exploring how curriculum design can arise from a focus on cognitively challenging learning experiences and an understanding of the pedagogical models and practices which facilitate this. The discussions and planned research are fine examples of teacher enquiry in action, which prompted me to write this blog post.

What do we mean by teacher enquiry?

A variety of terms exist for this work – classroom enquiry, action research, practitioner research – and it has a long history in educational research. Researchers Marilyn Cochran-Smith and Susan Lytle (2009, p.123-4) described teacher enquiry as, “neither a top-down nor a bottom-up theory of action, but an organic and democratic one that positions practitioners’ knowledge, practitioners and their interactions with students and other stakeholders at the centre of educational transformation’’. 

It is associated with small-scale investigations carried out by teachers in their own classrooms and schools. They don’t just observe it, they do it! Underpinning this and recognised is that teachers’ engagement with enquiry will provide answers to questions that they want answers to, and in turn will generate new knowledge.  

What are the benefits of teacher enquiry?

As is in evidence from the NACE R&D Hub meetings, the characteristics of this type of research are that it is undertaken by individual teachers or groups of teachers, it is conducted in schools with the purpose of improving classroom practice, and it leads to shared and greater learning. Teacher enquiry recognises that teachers are uniquely positioned to provide the insider’s view of how teachers and learners co-construct knowledge. Teacher enquiry in the form of short, focused projects is “authentic” because it is close to everyday classroom work; it is “ethical” because of how the enquiries are conducted with regard to confidentiality and anonymity; and it gives “voice” to represent and amplify this important work undertaken by teachers. In our Hub meetings at Copthorne, it is obvious to see the extensive thought processes that have gone into formulating the research questions for the different projects.

What does it look like in practice?

Research of this type has a definite shape to it, although each project in our R&D Hub is slightly different. Many models exist to illustrate teacher enquiry, but they are all based upon similar principles of planning, taking action and evaluation (Coghlan, 2019). 

Stage 1: conceptualisation

 Enquiries begin with the formulation of a question (sometimes referred to as a hypothesis). This is the conceptualisation stage. The question is posed by the teacher(s) or in conjunction with students and must be “researchable” with the potential to answer an issue in the classroom. The NACE R&D Hubs format for enquiry, “If I do X, will Y happen?” is extremely helpful in making this concise and the research viable.  

Stage 2: intervention

After the question is finalised (and often shortened for clarity), comes the intervention stage, where the investigation is planned in detail, a target group identified and baseline information from the target group set up. 

Stage 3: analysis

When sufficient data is gathered, it is organised in categories and then begins the analysis stage, where analysis of key themes leads to deeper understanding. 

Stage 4: evaluation

Finally, after 6-8 weeks, sufficient time to observe physical change taking place, conclusions are drawn which relate back to the original question and typically identify implications for classroom practice (or indeed further enquiry) arising from the investigation. This evaluation stage might include its value to the pupils, to the teacher’s professional learning, or more broadly to organisational learning. 

Whilst these four stages may appear to be a linear process, they are not: the shape is very much cyclical, returning to the original question posed.

How does this relate to provision for more able learners?

There are many benefits to conducting enquiry work focusing on more able learners. It helps create a space for busy teachers to stop and examine existing ways of working. It is situation-specific: it enables the examination of one’s own situation and leads to a better understanding of context. It is a participatory process, all about doing. It builds on teachers’ extensive knowledge of classroom practice already. It is collaborative, as the sharing of ideas with others in NACE R&D Hubs demonstrates. It involves robust evaluation: bringing a systematic and disciplined way of working that leads to new understandings and creates a bona fide evidence base, so important for developing how best to support more able learners in primary and secondary school contexts.

How to do it well: five top tips for teacher enquiry work

  1. Spend time getting the research question right. It must be clear and specific. For example, “How does the use of teacher written feedback improve learning in History for more able learners?”
  2. Set a baseline at the start of the project. This might be teacher assessment or achievement data.
  3. Use a variety of ways to collect data. This could be a short questionnaire, focus group interviews, set tasks or targeted lesson observations.
  4. Involve more able students from the start. Involve them in helping to plan the project. Talk to them about how this is going to happen and their view of it in implementation.
  5. Share your work. This might be within a school at a research meeting or a staff meeting. Consider going wider. A conference perhaps or writing the enquiry up for publication. This is new and important work. Share your successes!

A final word from Lawrence Stenhouse (1981) who commented that, ‘‘it is teachers who in the end will change the world of the school by understanding it’’.

References

  • Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (2009) Inquiry As Stance. New York: Teachers College Press
  • Coghlan, D. (2019) Doing Action Research in your Organisation. London: Sage.
  • Stenhouse L. (1981) What Counts as Research? British Journal of Education Studies. Vol XXIX, No. 2. June.

About the NACE R&D Hubs

NACE’s Research and Development (R&D) Hubs offer opportunities for NACE members to exchange effective practice, develop in-school research skills and collaborate on enquiry-based projects. Each Hub brings together members from all phases, sectors and contexts to share and augment the available evidence on what works for more able learners. Find out more here, or contact us to express your interest in joining the R&D Hubs next academic year.

Tags:  collaboration  CPD  curriculum  enquiry  pedagogy  professional development  research  school improvement 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 1 of 2
1  |  2